Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tina Fey Calls Out ‘Hollywood Bullshit'

13468911

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
    That's a fucktarded metaphor.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2016

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
    That's a fucktarded metaphor.
    OK!




    Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.

    Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.

    Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
    Steroids work wonders.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
    That's a fucktarded metaphor.
    OK!




    Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.

    Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.

    Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel.
    I'm not claiming to have a monopoly on the truth, and climate scientists aren't saying that we have to write their words down on stone tablets.

    Anyways, if science isn't settled in general why do any sort of research?
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

    but how about answering what you would do when Miami and New Orleans are under water in 75 years or less.

    Allah willing...
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    I'm hearing the science is settled.
    That's a fucktarded metaphor.
    OK!




    Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.

    Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.

    Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel.
    Just because science has been "wrong" in the past does not mean we ignore the overwhelming scientific findings of the present.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    edited March 2016

    salemcoog said:

    Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.

    Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.


    Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.

    But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
    Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
    It's natural as well. Look at Venus. A natural greenhouse effect turned Venus into what it is today. It will happen to earth regardless of what we do. Are we speeding it up? That's debatable. But I'll tell you that the major problem makers in China and India need to also stop if you want to reverse the man made problem. They won't, so again, what's the point?

    Get off your high horse, and provide a rational thought just for once. It's embarrassing seeing this guilt filled drivel you keep throwing up on these boards. Get some common sense and a clue.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,633 Standard Supporter

    Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.

    I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.

    this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.

    It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.

    I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example
    It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.