The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
I guess I'm in the middle. Better to be safe than sorry but also not be stupid.
The USA is doing a pretty good job in moving towards natural gas (while being more vigilant about methane leaks when fracking), wind, and solar while phasing out coal (the dirtiest of the all...basically the Sasha Grey of power production).
China and India will be getting in line...partially due to declining arable land and partially due to citizen complaints of terrible pollution (acid rain, spoiled bodies of water, suffocating smog, etc).
China is hurting badly due to overcapacity and bad debts in the steel / coal sector anyway though India needs to get its act together faster if it wants to take advantage of low oil prices to reinvest in their non-oil infrastructure and power.
Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.
I guess I'm in the middle. Better to be safe than sorry but also not be stupid.
The USA is doing a pretty good job in moving towards natural gas (while being more vigilant about methane leaks when fracking), wind, and solar while phasing out coal (the dirtiest of the all...basically the Sasha Grey of power production).
China and India will be getting in line...partially due to declining arable land and partially due to citizen complaints of terrible pollution (acid rain, spoiled bodies of water, suffocating smog, etc).
China is hurting badly due to overcapacity and bad debts in the steel / coal sector anyway though India needs to get its act together faster if it wants to take advantage of low oil prices to reinvest in their non-oil infrastructure and power.
But what does the post have to do with jumping up and down Screaming that WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING NOW!!!!
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
This is the stupidest fucking argument of them all.
If you are making the money argument, you're doing it wrong.
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.
It's much easier to sit back and deny, deny, deny, than to prove a scientific theory. Yet the deniers pretend they're equivalent. So some climate scientists got ahead of themselves and over-stated their cases. It's not right, but that shit happens, and it got corrected. But, because some scientists fudged does not, ipso facto, invalidate the entire field or theory, especially with mounds of supportive data and research. Yet, confirmation bias enters the picture and people then extract from one example to conclude it's a complete fraud. Not exactly empirical or scientific, yet politically extremely effective. Obviously.
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.
The deniers need only use the data the liars have. Simple stuff.
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.
Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.
The deniers need only use the data the liars have. Simple stuff.
You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.
You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Sounds like you agree with All Gore's profit motive.
You want a link with facts and evidence.... Here you go.
You link nothing then complain that anything anyone else links is BS so whats the point? You'd link stuff by the guys paid to show the problem exists. When other scientists who aren't being paid peer review the data and say call them out you ignore it. That's how the science community works, peer review. Maybe you need to tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Sounds like you agree with All Gore's profit motive.
You want a link with facts and evidence.... Here you go.
Do you want to listen to journalists and book writers? Or people paid to study the topic for a living?
I agree with you on this Honda about climate change. I think that there is a human element that is speeding up the natural occurrence of it. However, I think you've also acknowledged that America has come a long way in reducing their impact, and in many ways is leading the world in this effect. But if other countries like China and India don't come on board, we're really not helping the overall problem. This needs to be a global effort, and when a few countries get involved, it creates economic imbalance, and enables those advantaged countries (who are creating most of the problem), to continue their over production of green house gases.
I think further restrictions within our own border will cause a greater proportion of economic difficulties than the desired effect on climate change, when others don't participate. If these other countries voluntarily or by force (sanctions) come on board, then I'd be for further steps to help the issue.
Comments
The USA is doing a pretty good job in moving towards natural gas (while being more vigilant about methane leaks when fracking), wind, and solar while phasing out coal (the dirtiest of the all...basically the Sasha Grey of power production).
China and India will be getting in line...partially due to declining arable land and partially due to citizen complaints of terrible pollution (acid rain, spoiled bodies of water, suffocating smog, etc).
China is hurting badly due to overcapacity and bad debts in the steel / coal sector anyway though India needs to get its act together faster if it wants to take advantage of low oil prices to reinvest in their non-oil infrastructure and power.
If you are making the money argument, you're doing it wrong.
It's clear you really are the dumb.
http://www.newsmax.com/LarryBell/CATO-DQA-MIT-NOAA/2016/02/01/id/712153/
Then you link to a dude who wrote 2 books about climate change hoax. Do you think he donated the profits from the books to charity?
You want a link with facts and evidence.... Here you go.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
Do you want to listen to journalists and book writers? Or people paid to study the topic for a living?
I think further restrictions within our own border will cause a greater proportion of economic difficulties than the desired effect on climate change, when others don't participate. If these other countries voluntarily or by force (sanctions) come on board, then I'd be for further steps to help the issue.