Tina Fey Calls Out ‘Hollywood Bullshit'
Comments
-
Why do you think I suddenly care about the poor. Do you have some proof that I didn't?TurdBuffer said:Race suddenly gives a fuck about the poor. And he's fucking Ciara.
Are you admitting that you dont? Do you have a point or did you just drop in to be a dumbass?
Very poor poster. Horrible. Choker -
If you cared about the poor you wouldn't be debating the origins and causes of climate change. Instead you'd be embracing steps and processes to mitigate and reduce it, since the poor are getting fucked the hardest by it. But you'd rather pretend there's nothing we can do about it, as we continue to fill the skies with millions of tons of known climate-changing greenhouse gases. But, Yay for poor people. Horseshit.
-
How are the poor getting fucked by climate change the hardest? Other than by higher energy costs that are completely mam made by fucking idiots like you?TurdBuffer said:If you cared about the poor you wouldn't be debating the origins and causes of climate change. Instead you'd be embracing steps and processes to mitigate and reduce it, since the poor are getting fucked the hardest by it. But you'd rather pretend there's nothing we can do about it, as we continue to fill the skies with millions of tons of known climate-changing greenhouse gases. But, Yay for poor people. Horseshit.
Spell it out moron -
Here you go, Race. Have fun.
Scholarly articles for climate change harm poor
… distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor … - Mendelsohn - Cited by 285
The economics of climate change: the Stern review - Stern - Cited by 10041
Risk communication on climate: mental models and … - Sterman - Cited by 232
Search Results
How are the poor impacted by climate change?
https://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-limits-poor-poverty...Skeptical Science
They found the countries most severely impacted by climate change ... those who try to delay climate action, arguing that "CO2 limits will hurt the poor".
Climate change: the poor will suffer most | Environment ...
www.theguardian.com › Environment › Climate change
The Guardian
Mar 30, 2014 - UN report says that unless governments act now to reduce emissions, no one will be safe from effects of climate change.
Climate change will hit poor countries hardest, study shows ...
www.theguardian.com › ... › Environmental sustainability
The Guardian
Sep 27, 2013 - Climate change will hit poor countries hardest, study shows ... would worsen as climate change inevitably hurt crop production and disrupted ...
Climate change and poverty - Wikipedia, the free ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_and_poverty
Wikipedia
Climate change affects social development factors, such as, poverty, ..... energy production, but diminish the harmful effects of typical consumption (UN 2005).
Warming will hurt the poor but boost the rich in the short term
https://www.newscientist.com/.../dn28055-warming-will-hu...
New Scientist
Aug 17, 2015 - Climate change is bad for everyone in the long term, but a new model suggests it could make the rich nations even richer to begin with.
See What Climate Change Means for the World's Poor
news.nationalgeographic.com/.../151201-da...
National Geographic Society
Dec 1, 2015 - The most damaging effects of the changing climate will hit stomachs as well as wallets. ... See What Climate Change Means for the World's Poor ..... realization that poorer countries are already being hurt by climate change.“Climate change affects the poorest in developing countries”
www.worldbank.org/.../climate-change-affects-poorest-devel...
World Bank
Mar 3, 2014 - A changing climate affects the poorest people in developing countries the most. We need to act now to prevent rising temperatures and sea ...
A bad climate for development | The Economist
www.economist.com/node/14447171
The Economist
Sep 17, 2009 - Poor countries' economic development will contribute to climate change. ... example of how climate change is wreaking devastation in poor countries. ... The indirect harm, through its impact on water supplies, crop yields and ... -
Use your own words. Poor countries are fucked regardless. Making the American poor suffer for no reason doesn't change that. Making the American poor decide between food or heat or gas to get to work doesn't help the "poor countries" hypothetical suffering someday in the future maybe because you know it may get warmer. Or colder.
I want to know how I am wrong in saying the poor in America are getting fucked by not imposing additional costs on them for energy that they have to have.
We already have one dumbfuck here who knows how to link wiki.
-
Free pub!!!RaceBannon said:Use your own words. Poor countries are fucked regardless. Making the American poor suffer for no reason doesn't change that. Making the American poor decide between food or heat or gas to get to work doesn't help the "poor countries" hypothetical suffering someday in the future maybe because you know it may get warmer. Or colder.
I want to know how I am wrong in saying the poor in America are getting fucked by not imposing additional costs on them for energy that they have to have.
We already have one dumbfuck here who knows how to link wiki. -
Use YOUR own words, @RaceBannon, instead of appropriating the talking points of the oil and gas lobby. Those guys a) just fucking love poor people, and b) have nothing to do with energy prices as I do, because I set energy prices. That's what I do.
-
A rare chincredible for Hondo
-
Weak shit. A horrible poster. Low energy. His own state hates him. Next time you jump in bring something.TurdBuffer said:Use YOUR own words, @RaceBannon, instead of appropriating the talking points of the oil and gas lobby. Those guys a) just fucking love poor people, and b) have nothing to do with energy prices as I do, because I set energy prices. That's what I do.
-
Jeb!RaceBannon said:
Weak shit. A horrible poster. Low energy. His own state hates him. Next time you jump in bring something.TurdBuffer said:Use YOUR own words, @RaceBannon, instead of appropriating the talking points of the oil and gas lobby. Those guys a) just fucking love poor people, and b) have nothing to do with energy prices as I do, because I set energy prices. That's what I do.
-
I have zero chance of convincing a dumb-ass climate denier of anything, Race. But I call bullshit when I see it. Trotting out the old "choosing between food or gas" is a lib-tard talking point, hilariously spewing from you. The "poor families" in my area choose between Air Jordans vs. authentic NFL jerseys an iPhone 6 vs. 6 Plus, or a Navigator vs. a BMW, all while their kids eat FRL meals while we subsidize their rent AND ENERGY COSTS. Cry me a river. You're less authentic than Hillary.
-
You don't know anything about me. it isn't a talking point its a fact. I've lived it.TurdBuffer said:I have zero chance of convincing a dumb-ass climate denier of anything, Race. But I call bullshit when I see it. Trotting out the old "choosing between food or gas" is a lib-tard talking point, hilariously spewing from you. The "poor families" in my area choose between Air Jordans vs. authentic NFL jerseys an iPhone 6 vs. 6 Plus, or a Navigator vs. a BMW, all while their kids eat FRL meals while we subsidize their rent AND ENERGY COSTS. Cry me a river. You're less authentic than Hillary.
You have nothing to add here. Go back to Doogman and support Ty some more. All you cowards coming over here had to change you user names out of embarrassment over how fucking stupid you were and are. -
This is pretty poor concern trolling. I said in another post, and I stand behind it, that the poor will pay just as dearly for the effects of climate change than what they would through taxes. You're just kicking the can down the road, it doesn't make anything go away. But hey, China right? That's that can-do attitude.RaceBannon said:Use your own words. Poor countries are fucked regardless. Making the American poor suffer for no reason doesn't change that. Making the American poor decide between food or heat or gas to get to work doesn't help the "poor countries" hypothetical suffering someday in the future maybe because you know it may get warmer. Or colder.
I want to know how I am wrong in saying the poor in America are getting fucked by not imposing additional costs on them for energy that they have to have.
We already have one dumbfuck here who knows how to link wiki. -
Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
-
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
Disagree.
Your argument boils down to two parts:
a) that the poor will be disproportionately hit by carbon taxes passed down to the consumer.
I already proposed a tax credit to offset hearing and transportation costs, which is already active in some parts of the country as a furnace oil subsidy.
b) that you can't "see" the effects of climate change.
It's not hypothetical that Miami will be flooded within the next 50-100 years. Sea levels are rising and last I checked Miami isn't, so do your own math there.
Elitist bullshit is patronizing poor people by thinking you have to watch out for their well being because they're unable to do so. -
Disagree entirely and completely and decisivelydoogsinparadise said:Disagree.
Your argument boils down to two parts:
a) that the poor will be disproportionately hit by carbon taxes passed down to the consumer.
I already proposed a tax credit to offset hearing and transportation costs, which is already active in some parts of the country as a furnace oil subsidy.
b) that you can't "see" the effects of climate change.
It's not hypothetical that Miami will be flooded within the next 50-100 years. Sea levels are rising and last I checked Miami isn't, so do your own math there.
Elitist bullshit is patronizing poor people by thinking you have to watch out for their well being because they're unable to do so. -
doogsinparadise said:
Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road. -
dflea said:
What the fuck for? For allowing the ancestors of this herd of dumbfucks that surrounds us to survive?RaceBannon said:
We have proof that the little ice age culled the herd of humanity a great deal. Thank whoever you thank we have warmed up.doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
I've had enough of we have to pass it to see what is in it with Obamacare.
Scare stories about cities under water are as effective as stories about eternal damnation to an atheist.
It is no small price at all that the poor pay for the rich liberals religion of global warming.
I'm thinking another ice age might do us some good.
We got a jersey wearer here folks.TurdBuffer said:I have zero chance of convincing a dumb-ass climate denier of anything, Race. But I call bullshit when I see it. Trotting out the old "choosing between food or gas" is a lib-tard talking point, hilariously spewing from you. The "poor families" in my area choose between Air Jordans vs. authentic NFL jerseys an iPhone 6 vs. 6 Plus, or a Navigator vs. a BMW, all while their kids eat FRL meals while we subsidize their rent AND ENERGY COSTS. Cry me a river. You're less authentic than Hillary.
Set my energy price Doog! -
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road. -
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road. -
That's a fucktarded metaphor.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road. -
OK!doogsinparadise said:
That's a fucktarded metaphor.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.
Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.
Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel. -
Steroids work wonders.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road. -
I'm not claiming to have a monopoly on the truth, and climate scientists aren't saying that we have to write their words down on stone tablets.GrundleStiltzkin said:
OK!doogsinparadise said:
That's a fucktarded metaphor.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.
Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.
Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel.
Anyways, if science isn't settled in general why do any sort of research? -
Allah willing...doogsinparadise said:but how about answering what you would do when Miami and New Orleans are under water in 75 years or less.
-
Just because science has been "wrong" in the past does not mean we ignore the overwhelming scientific findings of the present.GrundleStiltzkin said:
OK!doogsinparadise said:
That's a fucktarded metaphor.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
Science has been settled chinnumberable times through human history.
Only to be disproven with further knowledge, research, measurement, technology, etc.
Point being, saying that "science is settled" actually flies in the face of the scientific method. Especially when it's said by a fucktarded politician-cum-filmmaker clutching an Oscar like it's a premature Nobel. -
It's natural as well. Look at Venus. A natural greenhouse effect turned Venus into what it is today. It will happen to earth regardless of what we do. Are we speeding it up? That's debatable. But I'll tell you that the major problem makers in China and India need to also stop if you want to reverse the man made problem. They won't, so again, what's the point?doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
Get off your high horse, and provide a rational thought just for once. It's embarrassing seeing this guilt filled drivel you keep throwing up on these boards. Get some common sense and a clue. -
These global warming threads are always the dumbest fucking things you'll ever read. I should kick my own ass for even opening this fucking thread - I already knew where it was going.
I'm going to cool my micro-climate with a cold Bloody Mary starting in about 10 minutes. Too bad I'm going to fuck the Earth by leaving the freezer open later when I get sauced. -
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example
