Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

With Sark being the consensus favorite to win pac12..

1…457910…23

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,242
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Tequilla said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Who might challenge him. I see the pac12 as pitiful next year. Stanford and senior Kevin Hogan are their only real competition. Maybe Zona,Oregon...maybe CAL?

    SC's real competition is Seven ...

    It's not that fucking hard to see that.
    Thanks for stating the obvious Teqilla. I was looking for someone who actually watches conference play, knows about the quality teams going into next year, who can bring an opinion on who might challenge USC.

    Utah has a senior qb returning. Can they duplicate defensively to give Travis Wilson a chance? Can they replace Booker at tb? Dres Anderson (not sure if he gets another year)?, who replaces Mannion? Hundley? Mariota? Is this Cal's year with a gunslinging true Jr in Goff?

    I just picked a few examples of how you bring chips to the table to make a debate . Saying Sark is too busy picking up waitress's, or USC will implode because of Seven is bullshit. Look at who's coming back. Kessler is prolly the most seasoned senior QB in the country. And the talent around him is comparable to any team in the country, compared to any SEC team going into next year. Can Sark replace Leonard Williams, Nelson Agholor? The seniors on the oline?

    See im not just jumping on USC's wagon. Im looking at other pac12 teams and deducing USC has a great chance comparitively.

    Who's going to challenge them Teqilla? What's your opinion on that? How do you see it?

    And Thomas your pitiful one-liners wont apply here. Care to get involved in an actual football discussion? Isnt that why youre here? Try just once. *yawn* is what I expect.
    PL_SS:

    If you are going to call people out for not bringing enough to the table I expect you to at least get half of your facts right...

    Booker is coming back to Utah, he announced a few days ago.

    Dres Anderson is done at Utah, if you are an expert like you claim, you should know that.

    There were no seniors on USC's oline this year getting significant time. Banner, Toa, Tuerk, Talamaivaoaoa, Mama, Rodgers, Simmons were their main guys. In fact, they only had one senior olineman (Aundrey Walker) who barely played.

    Get your shit together man.

    Difference? I go off top of my head as I know most everythinh. I dont spend 6 hours googling info like you dipshits. Dres had a chance for a medical I thought. If I wasted my entire day trying to google this shit I couldnt enlighten you all on a daily basis.
    It takes you all day to use Google? You're dumber than I thought
    When you use dial up AOL it does
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Blitz, Oregon played and lost the title, past tense. New year and USC will be favored to win the conference over your ducks. Your Mariota window closed for fuck sakes. Get over it. Back to reality for Oregon. A team with a lot of talent and no QB. SC has a senior QB and more talent . Now lets let it play out and see if Coker can coach without Ken Dorsey (Mariota in this analogy for tardos like you know who...j, tommy etc )

    Not a slam on your ducks just reality. This is the pac12, oregon is not just the best by default. There's 11 other teams gunning f or a chance to actually win the fucking title. Your chance expired bitch.

    Oregon will be back in the title game within 4 years. You can fry, cook, sauté that shit however you prefer.
    4 years? Fuck, Pete will have UW in title game in 3 years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited January 2015
    sarktastic said:

    USC has enough talent to win 10 games, easy. With Sark at the helm it's reasona. Sark e for everybody to expect a title game.

    SC has something every other pac12 team besides furd, ASU and Utah doesnt...a senior at qb, plus more talent @ the starting 22 vs a down conference in '15. Sark better win 12. Furd at home. Game @ Cal will be tricky, same with Bercovici
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    sarktastic said:

    USC has enough talent to win 10 games, easy. With Sark at the helm it's reasona. Sark e for everybody to expect a title game.

    SC has something every other pac12 team besides furd, ASU and Utah doesnt...a senior at qb, plus more talent @ the starting 22 vs a down conference in '15. Sark better win 12. Furd at home. Game @ Cal will be tricky, same with Bercovici
    Most meaningless stat ever.

    None of the top teams in the conference this past season had a senior playing QB.

    But how does PLSS suck Sark's dick?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Blitz, Oregon played and lost the title, past tense. New year and USC will be favored to win the conference over your ducks. Your Mariota window closed for fuck sakes. Get over it. Back to reality for Oregon. A team with a lot of talent and no QB. SC has a senior QB and more talent . Now lets let it play out and see if Coker can coach without Ken Dorsey (Mariota in this analogy for tardos like you know who...j, tommy etc )

    Not a slam on your ducks just reality. This is the pac12, oregon is not just the best by default. There's 11 other teams gunning f or a chance to actually win the fucking title. Your chance expired bitch.

    Oregon will be back in the title game within 4 years. You can fry, cook, sauté that shit however you prefer.
    4 years? Fuck, Pete will have UW in title game in 3 years.
    image

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited January 2015
    Uh, freemont, A senior qb or 4th year jr (4 years in the program or senior in class) has most always determined the pac12 champ. Not always but just about every fucking year you gadammed imbicile. Go back 20 years and do the math.

    A senior qb has always been one of the leading factors going into a team's pre-season prognostications. A redshirt junior is the same as a true senior. Stanford and USC both fave seniors...what do you know buttsniffer, they are the favorites. Winston andJones were RS sophomores, but neither were mentioned in pre-season analysis
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    Hogan sucks
    Kessler sarks

    conference is wide open
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited January 2015
    Kessler isn't anything special...He's only marginally better than most PAC 12 teams' second string QBs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,015
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Kessler isn't anything special...He's only marginally significantly better than most PAC 12 teams' second string QBs Miles.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter