Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Conservatives knock it out of the park
Comments
-
Look up at my last post, yes you did say that. You also got the Pelosi quote wrong. You mentioned some other shit out of context as well. All just regurgitating what your masters say.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Facts? I laid them out, still waiting for yours. Quick, rush to your lecture notes buttfuck. And never said Osama caused recession, said specifically, WITH FACTS, he hasnt brought us out of it. I should start charging you. you've learned more from me in this thread then you did all last quarter @ Evergreen.:)2001400ex said:
Except I post actual facts and don't say stupid shit like "Obama caused the recession" when he wasn't even in office the first 13 months of the recession.RaceBannon said:Honda thinks he's different from puppy
-
Youre still on benghazi? Dude, we took the senate...do you know this? Its hard to focus on politics while blowing guys 40hrs/week at the moses rest area for gas money for your outdated 4-wheeler, and 1984 toyota 4×4. Howmany miles on that sucker?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How is that Benghazi investigation working out for you? Your news source lied to you about that as well.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Agree boobs. I dont rely on fox for news, I just like to hear news presented in a way that doesnt protect our criminal president
We???
CHRIST.
Kill yourself already. -
We???ThomasFremont said:
Youre still on benghazi? Dude, we took the senate...do you know this? Its hard to focus on politics while blowing guys 40hrs/week at the moses rest area for gas money for your outdated 4-wheeler, and 1984 toyota 4×4. Howmany miles on that sucker?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How is that Benghazi investigation working out for you? Your news source lied to you about that as well.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Agree boobs. I dont rely on fox for news, I just like to hear news presented in a way that doesnt protect our criminal president
CHRIST.
Kill yourself already.
I'm just glad that puppy is going to take responsibility for every fucktarded thing the senate does for the next two years. Oh wait that's never going to happen, this is Mr profiles in courage, run to the mods puppy love we're talking about. -
I'm just glad that puppy is going to take responsibility for every fucktarded thing the senate does for the next two years. Oh wait that's never going to happen, this is Mr profiles in courage, run to the mods puppy love we're talking aboutdoogsinparadise said:
We???ThomasFremont said:
Youre still on benghazi? Dude, we took the senate...do you know this? Its hard to focus on politics while blowing guys 40hrs/week at the moses rest area for gas money for your outdated 4-wheeler, and 1984 toyota 4×4. Howmany miles on that sucker?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How is that Benghazi investigation working out for you? Your news source lied to you about that as well.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Agree boobs. I dont rely on fox for news, I just like to hear news presented in a way that doesnt protect our criminal president
CHRIST.
Kill yourself already.
He'll still find a way to blame democrats for everything wrong. Even tho both parties are fucked up. -
Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
-
Wait what? I always thought PLSS was someone's gag account.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
-
Puppy has brought data, facts etc...whhhat the frig have any of you greazy libia's brought? You'd better take puppy seriously. Puppy doesnt "debate" with you hacks, he just presents reality, then watches as you dildo's scramble to rebut.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
I suppose you support a gas tax on fuel for your 125cc girly 4 whe e ler Ex? -
Always about Reagan, you sound like a husky fan and the 91' team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Do your own research bitch...the facts are there. Since obama took office and during the great recession, the GDP has risen 3.2% (compared to Reagan's whopping 18.6% rate after the recession he stepped into) with the lowest labor participation rate, workers who have stopped looking for employment, and "part time" workers counting in the "employment #'s (actual unemployment is closer to 20%).jecornel said:
Send me the facts. Also, repubs would be just as big a failure as obummer...puppyfucktard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uhh we have the lowest labor participation since 1948 and wages are decreasing. Obama has killed our economy and is kicking it while it's down dipshit
Obama's TRUE economic indicators are at the lowest levels of any president since the grat depression. In other words, "obama's economy has had the WORST recovery from any recession since the great depression...a very compelling statement.. Try "the national bureau of economic research", These are facts bitch.
Typical lefty twisting... Believing innaccurate leftist economic generalities. -
jecornel said:
Always about Reagan, you sound like DJ and black people.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Do your own research bitch...the facts are there. Since obama took office and during the great recession, the GDP has risen 3.2% (compared to Reagan's whopping 18.6% rate after the recession he stepped into) with the lowest labor participation rate, workers who have stopped looking for employment, and "part time" workers counting in the "employment #'s (actual unemployment is closer to 20%).jecornel said:
Send me the facts. Also, repubs would be just as big a failure as obummer...puppyfucktard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uhh we have the lowest labor participation since 1948 and wages are decreasing. Obama has killed our economy and is kicking it while it's down dipshit
Obama's TRUE economic indicators are at the lowest levels of any president since the grat depression. In other words, "obama's economy has had the WORST recovery from any recession since the great depression...a very compelling statement.. Try "the national bureau of economic research", These are facts bitch.
Typical lefty twisting... Believing innaccurate leftist economic generalities. -
Reagan created jobs and prosperity. Just an example of a president with a plan. Clinton was an excellent president as was my favorite JFK. Just because im a conservative doesnt mean I cant recognize excellence. Unfortunately Obama is one of, if not the worst president of all time fiscally, militarily, socially and in terms of foreign relations. Dont shoot the messenger.
One of you hacks needs to bring some facts to support your blind, defiant, defensive and ignorant liberal views. Im all ears... -
Lot of truth in thispuppylove_sugarsteel said:Reagan created jobs and prosperity. Just an example of a president with a plan. Clinton was an excellent president as was my favorite JFK. Just because im a conservative doesnt mean I cant recognize excellence. Unfortunately Obama is one of, if not the worst president of all time fiscally, militarily, socially and in terms of foreign relations. Dont shoot the messenger.
One of you hacks needs to bring some facts to support your blind, defiant, defensive and ignorant liberal views. Im all ears...
If you lived through the 70's you'd appreciate what Reagan did to bring on the 80's boom. Who doesn't love the 80"s?
The 90's were good too under Bubba. Over a lot of those 20 years we had split control between the white house and congress. Most of this century has been single party rule. -
Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
-
I welcome the gridlock. Highly underrated.RaceBannon said:
Lot of truth in thispuppylove_sugarsteel said:Reagan created jobs and prosperity. Just an example of a president with a plan. Clinton was an excellent president as was my favorite JFK. Just because im a conservative doesnt mean I cant recognize excellence. Unfortunately Obama is one of, if not the worst president of all time fiscally, militarily, socially and in terms of foreign relations. Dont shoot the messenger.
One of you hacks needs to bring some facts to support your blind, defiant, defensive and ignorant liberal views. Im all ears...
If you lived through the 70's you'd appreciate what Reagan did to bring on the 80's boom. Who doesn't love the 80"s?
The 90's were good too under Bubba. Over a lot of those 20 years we had split control between the white house and congress. Most of this century has been single party rule. -
Dont hate cutie)))puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
-
Can I have a nickname or are you gonna continue to leave me in the friend zone with raging blue balls?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
-
Why do you hate SuchFagJ?PurpleJ said:
Can I have a nickname or are you gonna continue to leave me in the friend zone with raging blue balls?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
-
Extra lulz that puppy apparently thinks I'm a progressive.
-
I'm an American.GrundleStiltzkin said:Extra lulz that puppy apparently thinks I'm a progressive.
-
#I ridewithmuslimsPurpleJ said: -
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Puppy and bad attempt at humor are not synonymous. Pretty much batting 1000 there caberonH_D said:
WTF? That was just a bad attempt at humor.puppylove_sugarsteel said:And "all I got" in this thread outweighs your entire contribution, or lack therof, to HHB. Those 225 posts shows how insignificant your little cunt is here. Dont play with the big flame you little fleeb or you'll RIP with cockus and damone (guys with years experience here) . Lurk a little before you post ex, at least till you get your GED.
-
LOL now that's funny. Recession was from July 1981 to November 1982. Why do you blame that recession on Carter while you blame a recession that started 13 months BEFORE Obama was inaugurated on Obama?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Do your own research bitch...the facts are there. Since obama took office and during the great recession, the GDP has risen 3.2% (compared to Reagan's whopping 18.6% rate after the recession he stepped into) with the lowest labor participation rate, workers who have stopped looking for employment, and "part time" workers counting in the "employment #'s (actual unemployment is closer to 20%).jecornel said:
Send me the facts. Also, repubs would be just as big a failure as obummer...puppyfucktard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uhh we have the lowest labor participation since 1948 and wages are decreasing. Obama has killed our economy and is kicking it while it's down dipshit
Obama's TRUE economic indicators are at the lowest levels of any president since the grat depression. In other words, "obama's economy has had the WORST recovery from any recession since the great depression...a very compelling statement.. Try "the national bureau of economic research", These are facts bitch.
Typical lefty twisting... Believing innaccurate leftist economic generalities.
Facts??? LOL you got none.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Puppy has brought data, facts etc...whhhat the frig have any of you greazy libia's brought? You'd better take puppy seriously. Puppy doesnt "debate" with you hacks, he just presents reality, then watches as you dildo's scramble to rebut.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
I suppose you support a gas tax on fuel for your 125cc girly 4 whe e ler Ex?
Yeah . facts. Or something. This is from Forbes which is a conservative news outlet.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Puppy has brought data, facts etc...whhhat the frig have any of you greazy libia's brought? You'd better take puppy seriously. Puppy doesnt "debate" with you hacks, he just presents reality, then watches as you dildo's scramble to rebut.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
I suppose you support a gas tax on fuel for your 125cc girly 4 whe e ler Ex?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/09/05/obama-outperforms-reagan-on-jobs-growth-and-investing/
-
How about purplefay?PurpleJ said:
Can I have a nickname or are you gonna continue to leave me in the friend zone with raging blue balls?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
-
Most presidents deal with recessions. The difference? They dont last 6-7 years. Obama is clueless. Now do your homework and give puppy something, anything EX2001400ex said:
LOL now that's funny. Recession was from July 1981 to November 1982. Why do you blame that recession on Carter while you blame a recession that started 13 months BEFORE Obama was inaugurated on Obama?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Do your own research bitch...the facts are there. Since obama took office and during the great recession, the GDP has risen 3.2% (compared to Reagan's whopping 18.6% rate after the recession he stepped into) with the lowest labor participation rate, workers who have stopped looking for employment, and "part time" workers counting in the "employment #'s (actual unemployment is closer to 20%).jecornel said:
Send me the facts. Also, repubs would be just as big a failure as obummer...puppyfucktard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uhh we have the lowest labor participation since 1948 and wages are decreasing. Obama has killed our economy and is kicking it while it's down dipshit
Obama's TRUE economic indicators are at the lowest levels of any president since the grat depression. In other words, "obama's economy has had the WORST recovery from any recession since the great depression...a very compelling statement.. Try "the national bureau of economic research", These are facts bitch.
Typical lefty twisting... Believing innaccurate leftist economic generalities.
Facts??? LOL you got none.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States -
Obamas "job growth" is based on part time workers and those who've stopped looking for work. These are the facts EX. Last time ill say it. Bring something truthful and useful.2001400ex said:puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Puppy has brought data, facts etc...whhhat the frig have any of you greazy libia's brought? You'd better take puppy seriously. Puppy doesnt "debate" with you hacks, he just presents reality, then watches as you dildo's scramble to rebut.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
I suppose you support a gas tax on fuel for your 125cc girly 4 whe e ler Ex?
Yeah . facts. Or something. This is from Forbes which is a conservative news outlet.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Puppy has brought data, facts etc...whhhat the frig have any of you greazy libia's brought? You'd better take puppy seriously. Puppy doesnt "debate" with you hacks, he just presents reality, then watches as you dildo's scramble to rebut.Doogles said:Honda is breaking rule #1 on Hardcore Husky. Never take Puppy seriously. Even worse, if you attempt serious debate with sugar you deserve to jump into a swimming pool of boiling fry grease.
I suppose you support a gas tax on fuel for your 125cc girly 4 whe e ler Ex?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/09/05/obama-outperforms-reagan-on-jobs-growth-and-investing/ -
Possibly the dumbest post and source ever seen here2001400ex said:
LOL now that's funny. Recession was from July 1981 to November 1982. Why do you blame that recession on Carter while you blame a recession that started 13 months BEFORE Obama was inaugurated on Obama?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Do your own research bitch...the facts are there. Since obama took office and during the great recession, the GDP has risen 3.2% (compared to Reagan's whopping 18.6% rate after the recession he stepped into) with the lowest labor participation rate, workers who have stopped looking for employment, and "part time" workers counting in the "employment #'s (actual unemployment is closer to 20%).jecornel said:
Send me the facts. Also, repubs would be just as big a failure as obummer...puppyfucktard.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uhh we have the lowest labor participation since 1948 and wages are decreasing. Obama has killed our economy and is kicking it while it's down dipshit
Obama's TRUE economic indicators are at the lowest levels of any president since the grat depression. In other words, "obama's economy has had the WORST recovery from any recession since the great depression...a very compelling statement.. Try "the national bureau of economic research", These are facts bitch.
Typical lefty twisting... Believing innaccurate leftist economic generalities.
Facts??? LOL you got none.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States -
I already told you to kill yourself.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
End of discussion as far as I'm concerned. -
Wikipedia (Listeni/ˌwɪkɨˈpiːdiə/ or Listeni/ˌwɪkiˈpiːdiə/ WIK-i-PEE-dee-ə) is a free-access, free content Internet encyclopedia, supported and hosted by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Anyone who can access the site can edit almost any of its articles, as long as they follow the rules.[6] Wikipedia is the seventh-most popular website[5] and constitutes the Internet's largest and most popular general reference work.[7][8][9]RaceBannon said:Possibly the dumbest post and source ever seen here
Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched Wikipedia on January 15, 2001. Sanger[10] coined its name,[11] a portmanteau of wiki (from the Hawaiian word for "quick")[12] and encyclopedia. Although Wikipedia's content was initially only in English, it quickly became multilingual, through the launch of versions in different languages. All versions are similar, but differences exist in content and in editing practices. The English Wikipedia is now one of more than 200 Wikipedias and is the largest with over 4.6 million articles. As of February 2014, it had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors each month.[13] Wikipedia has more than 22 million accounts, out of which there were over 73,000 active editors globally as of May 2014.[2]
Wikipedia's accuracy is similar to Encyclopedia Britannica, with Wikipedia being much larger. However, critics argue Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias,[14] and its group dynamics hinder its goals.[clarification needed] Most academics, historians, teachers and journalists reject Wikipedia as a reliable source of information for being a mixture of truths, half truths, and some falsehoods,[14] and that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is notoriously subject to manipulation and spin.[15] Wikipedia's Consensus and Undue Weight policies have been repeatedly criticised by prominent scholarly sources for undermining freedom of thought and leading to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[16][17][18][19]
Openness
Differences between versions of an article are highlighted as shown.
Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle (i.e. waiting for an issue to cause enough problems before taking measure to solve it) regarding the security of its content.[20] It started almost entirely open—anyone could create articles, and any Wikipedia article could be edited by any reader, even those who did not have a Wikipedia account. Modifications to all articles would be published immediately. As a result, any article could contain inaccuracies such as errors, ideological biases, and nonsensical or irrelevant text.
Restrictions
Over time, the English Wikipedia and some other Wikipedias gradually restricted modifications. For example, in the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[21] On the English Wikipedia and some others, some particularly sensitive and/or vandalism-prone pages are now "protected" to some degree.[22] A frequently vandalized article can be semi-protected, meaning that only certain editors are able to modify it.[23] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators are able to make changes.[24]
In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles,[25] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012.[26] Under this system, new users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are "subject to review from an established Wikipedia editor before publication".[27]
The editing interface of Wikipedia
Review of changes
Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides certain tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. The "History" page of each article links to each revision.[notes 2][28] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's history page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of any changes. "New pages patrol" is a process whereby newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[29]
In 2003, economics PhD student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki create a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favor "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[30]
Vandalism
Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia
Any edit that changes content in a way that deliberately compromises the integrity of Wikipedia is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include insertion of obscenities and crude humor. Vandalism can also include advertising language and other types of spam.[31] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing information or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information to an article, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the underlying code of an article, or use images disruptively.[32]
White-haired elderly gentleman in suit and tie speaks at a podium.
American journalist John Seigenthaler (1927–2014), subject of the Seigenthaler incident -
EX, I know from the top of my head all of Obuma's deficiencies. Im asking for you to provide FACTS, STATISTICS to support your lefty views and you research and bring this? You can look forever and not find proof that defends Obums horrific track record on the economy.
Switch parties, its catching on. People want 40-hour /week jobs and better wages. Both have gone drastically downhill since 2008. Thats bad. Yank your head from your gine and look around. Part time jobs and a meager wage is the premise of Obums "recovery". That is fact. Glad im not a minimum wager like you EX. You, and many americans have a long road to travel.
-
You can do better. Lay it on me bubba!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
How about purplefay?PurpleJ said:
Can I have a nickname or are you gonna continue to leave me in the friend zone with raging blue balls?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Your silence speaks volumes Ex, freemont, snuggles, jecornhole, splitskin, paradise among others...
