It's Sad to see how far Dawgman.com Has Fallen
Comments
-
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1 -
-
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse. -
Jesus. Worse than I thought.PurpleJ said:
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse. -
MikeDamone said:
Jesus. Worse than I thought.PurpleJ said:
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse.
-
One wonders if it would have been as highly acclaimed had Tolstoy used the original title.allpurpleallgold said:
The original title was actualy "War...what is it good for?".DerekJohnson said:It was a War and Peace sized novel with More_Cock.
-
Swaye said:
Did this thread just become a sort of fucked up HH kumbaya session? If so, I am totally in.
-
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh. -
Yes he is actually paralyzed. And had I known that people would taunt him over that fact, I never would have revealed his paralysis last year while telling a story about him.biak1 said:TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh. -
Haid d. was star that burned fast and bright, but as such stars are, he quickly burnt himself out and had been quiet and dark. RIP Salaami.Swaye said:Haven't seen Salaami post in ages. Assumed he was still banned. Guy was funny, when he wasn't in for mass genocide. But, I would be in for a mass genocide on Sounders fans. Just sayin'. Except FO, G. He can live.
-
Which is why PurpleJs "there can be no moderation or it's just like Dawgman" Cockus like rhetoric is fucktarded. We burned HHBv1.0 to the ground. (I'm being kind saying we because I didn't do that shit). That would happen here as well with no moderation.DerekJohnson said:
Yes he is actually paralyzed. And had I known that people would taunt him over that fact, I never would have revealed his paralysis last year while telling a story about him.biak1 said:TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh.
Wherever you think there's a line that people won't cross there's a half brain there crossing it. -
Free pub.Swaye said:Haven't seen Salaami post in ages. Assumed he was still banned. Guy was funny, when he wasn't in for mass genocide. But, I would be in for a mass genocide on Sounders fans. Just sayin'. Except FO, G. He can live.
-
You could always add a ball pit or sandbox subforum to the board and restrict the inmates to only posting there until their sentence is served. Better than outright ban hammer.
-
I think Seven only won 3 titles in 5 years.RaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
If I remember correctly, he finished with 9, 10 and 11 hypothetical wins his last 3 years. -
Quite honestly I believe his hypothetical record at Washington was 54-9.NotTheCase said:
I think Seven only won 3 titles in 5 years.RaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
If I remember correctly, he finished with 9, 10 and 11 hypothetical wins his last 3 years. -
I'd love to see a board where only Harv, Cockus, Spooge and the others can post.PurpleReign said:You could always add a ball pit or sandbox subforum to the board and restrict the inmates to only posting there until their sentence is served. Better than outright ban hammer.
-
We need that bored to be called Beyond ThunderDome.whatshouldicareabout said:
I'd love to see a board where only Harv, Cockus, Spooge and the others can post.PurpleReign said:You could always add a ball pit or sandbox subforum to the board and restrict the inmates to only posting there until their sentence is served. Better than outright ban hammer.
-
Catatonic after 23 Hot Pockets?Swaye said:Here is what I see happening. DJ begins to realize by looking at internal numbers (just made that up) that it is really the Road Sluts that drive 80 percent of the traffic here (in reality it is just Koop refreshing the page 53 times per minute to go for epic JO sessions). I start getting a weekly feature article to really showcase the whores. Donations skyrocket. The Bored of Directors votes to give me royalties, say 81 dollars a month.
I use the money to buy Hot Pockets in bulk, and go into a catatonic stupor after ingesting 23 Hot Pockets at once. I never recover. The Sluts are dead. I'm dead. And Sven takes out his frstration by pouring napalm on all the Vanilla servers and burning this mother fucker down. The end.
Want to visit Vegas with me?
-
Are you implying that we may have some habitual line-steppers in our ranks???allpurpleallgold said:
Which is why PurpleJs "there can be no moderation or it's just like Dawgman" Cockus like rhetoric is fucktarded. We burned HHBv1.0 to the ground. (I'm being kind saying we because I didn't do that shit). That would happen here as well with no moderation.DerekJohnson said:
Yes he is actually paralyzed. And had I known that people would taunt him over that fact, I never would have revealed his paralysis last year while telling a story about him.biak1 said:TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh.
Wherever you think there's a line that people won't cross there's a half brain there crossing it.
Poppycock!
P.S. I learned the lesson of zero moderation on the dawgbored the hard way.
P.L.S.S. I love me some puppylove, but I still gotta say SEC SEC SEC.
-
I agree with the some but minimal moderation approach. I also know that I don't have the ability to do it myself because I probably would have banned a few people just because they get on my nerves and don't shut up.
Derek seems to have found the right line - actively fuck up the bored and you'll be gone, but usually with a warning -
Jesus...How is the schedule subjective? You're smarter than that. I think.dnc said:
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
I don't know. An SEC team just beat a ranked Kansas State on the road and you SEC haters somehow think this proves that they suck and never play anyone.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Jesus...How is the schedule subjective? You're smarter than that. I think.dnc said:
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
You sound like a jilted lover.allpurpleallgold said:
I don't know. An SEC team just beat a ranked Kansas State on the road and you SEC haters somehow think this proves that they suck and never play anyone.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Jesus...How is the schedule subjective? You're smarter than that. I think.dnc said:
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
Well put. People will always try to push the boundaries especially when they're relatively anonymous except to maybe Vanilla, mods, and Ukrainian hackers in mom's basement. I may have even pushed a few boundaries in the past.allpurpleallgold said:
Which is why PurpleJs "there can be no moderation or it's just like Dawgman" Cockus like rhetoric is fucktarded. We burned HHBv1.0 to the ground. (I'm being kind saying we because I didn't do that shit). That would happen here as well with no moderation.DerekJohnson said:
Yes he is actually paralyzed. And had I known that people would taunt him over that fact, I never would have revealed his paralysis last year while telling a story about him.biak1 said:TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh.
Wherever you think there's a line that people won't cross there's a half brain there crossing it. -
The schedule itself is not subjective. Your argument about the schedule is subjective.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Jesus...How is the schedule subjective? You're smarter than that. I think.dnc said:
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
hth -
Huh?allpurpleallgold said:
Which is why PurpleJs "there can be no moderation or it's just like Dawgman" Cockus like rhetoric is fucktarded. We burned HHBv1.0 to the ground. (I'm being kind saying we because I didn't do that shit). That would happen here as well with no moderation.DerekJohnson said:
Yes he is actually paralyzed. And had I known that people would taunt him over that fact, I never would have revealed his paralysis last year while telling a story about him.biak1 said:TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh.
Wherever you think there's a line that people won't cross there's a half brain there crossing it.
-
Tough crowd over there. They nailed one of my accounts. They must waste a ton of time troll hunting. Lol.
We're sorry to inform you that you have been banned from all activity on Dawgman.com forums. We hope that you will continue to enjoy other content on Dawgman.com and the rest of the Scout.com network.
This is an automated message, please do not reply.
Sincerely, the staff at Dawgman
