Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
Three in a row (effectively) is THE mindset of a Champion.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard
But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State
Winning is winning
Rick was spotty before UW and after
I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
Just making sure everything is evidence based.
Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.
LIPO
Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
There's plenty of time for DeBoer to make us hate him again this season. A flat performance in Pullman or a limp dick bowl effort can get there easily.
But him and his staff get the two weeks to smoke weed and talk shit.
There's plenty of time for DeBoer to make us hate him again this season. A flat performance in Pullman or a limp dick bowl effort can get there easily.
But him and his staff get the two weeks to smoke weed and talk shit.
I would wager heavily our? days of limp dick effort are over.
My support for hiring Deboer was based on this: people who excel zat one thing or in one place tend to carry that with them. Really driven people stay driven and smart people stay smart.
It's not possible to do much better than he did at Sioux Falls. He had a few years as a coordinator and HC at D1 schools so he wasn't going to be blindsided by how hard the job is.
He just seemed like a good candidate. If you aren't stealing Saban or somehow luring Bob Stoops out of retirement, this seems like a good risk to me. Returns so far are mixed but pointing mostly toward me being right.
Not crowning though. He'll prove it when he proves it. Or not.
My support for hiring Deboer was based on this: people who excel zat one thing or in one place tend to carry that with them. Really driven people stay driven and smart people stay smart.
It's not possible to do much better than he did at Sioux Falls. He had a few years as a coordinator and HC at D1 schools so he wasn't going to be blindsided by how hard the job is.
He just seemed like a good candidate. If you aren't stealing Saban or somehow luring Bob Stoops out of retirement, this seems like a good risk to me. Returns so far are mixed but pointing mostly toward me being right.
Not crowning though. He'll prove it when he proves it. Or not.
Bob Stoops would have pulled a Peterman by year 2. A guy who quit a winning Oklahoma program agrees to coach a no booster supported woke community team with a twenty something Duck grad stumping for an oly fans deal running point for the lifeblood of the roster? How long does that last?
Stoops would have pulled the Peterman card, needing 1-2 years to get his guys in here. New scheme, new attitude. Sub 500 record supplemented by Peterman speak, "it's hard to win in this league."
The Doogs swoon when Stoops kicks the best player of the team for the betterment of the program. Then, a change of heart. Presser called.
Brother Mike takes the rains with the program never in better shape. Bobby is thanked for his service. Jen calls him a Dawg for life. Multiple threads on Brand-X with reach arounds for the HOF coach for stepping up when called to serve. Lots of "Woof!" Then the program dips. Again. But our history and legacy of doing it RIGHT
My support for hiring Deboer was based on this: people who excel zat one thing or in one place tend to carry that with them. Really driven people stay driven and smart people stay smart.
It's not possible to do much better than he did at Sioux Falls. He had a few years as a coordinator and HC at D1 schools so he wasn't going to be blindsided by how hard the job is.
He just seemed like a good candidate. If you aren't stealing Saban or somehow luring Bob Stoops out of retirement, this seems like a good risk to me. Returns so far are mixed but pointing mostly toward me being right.
Not crowning though. He'll prove it when he proves it. Or not.
Bob Stoops would have pulled a Peterman by year 2. A guy who quit a winning Oklahoma program agrees to coach a no booster supported woke community team with a twenty something Duck grad stumping for an oly fans deal running point for the lifeblood of the roster? How long does that last?
Stoops would have pulled the Peterman card, needing 1-2 years to get his guys in here. New scheme, new attitude. Sub 500 record supplemented by Peterman speak, "it's hard to win in this league."
The Doogs swoon when Stoops kicks the best player of the team for the betterment of the program. Then, a change of heart. Presser called.
Brother Mike takes the rains with the program never in better shape. Bobby is thanked for his service. Jen calls him a Dawg for life. Multiple threads on Brand-X with reach arounds for the HOF coach for stepping up when called to serve. Lots of "Woof!" Then the program dips. Again. But our history and legacy of doing it RIGHT
Fuck that
Yeah that's probably about how it would go. It would've been hard to find anyone questioning it at the time had it been a real thing though. That's sizzle.
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
It's fair to question if the next man up will be as good as Penix, odds are he won't lead the nation in passing.
But it's important to remember that Penix was bad/awful without Deboer and was ranked a 3 star transfer. Nobody was knocking on his door to play.
Also watch the game with your eyes and it's obvious the routes and multiple looks are scheming guys open.
He’s made some great throws but even on some of those plays, the scheme got them open. The 76 yard TD throw to Polk was a fucking dime, but he was wide open deep. There are tons of those examples. TD to Westover against Oregon State, Newton vs Cal.
We have some good talent at WR, but these guys aren’t open because they are incredible players. They are wide open because
Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.
I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.
Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.
Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
The process is that DeBoer has always had great offenses and he needs to figure it the fuck out with the talent and coaching on defense. It’s not like this team is his ideal team.
Thats why I personally have not anointed him
Nothing to anoint yet. I’m optimistic and his track record is very good. Still gotta get it done. So far, it has been a good season, albeit with some warts.
Comments
Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.
Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.
Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach
I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game
Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now
DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games
Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous
Tim Grover would call that a "cleaner". IYKYK.
Too simplistic
But him and his staff get the two weeks to smoke weed and talk shit.
It's not possible to do much better than he did at Sioux Falls. He had a few years as a coordinator and HC at D1 schools so he wasn't going to be blindsided by how hard the job is.
He just seemed like a good candidate. If you aren't stealing Saban or somehow luring Bob Stoops out of retirement, this seems like a good risk to me. Returns so far are mixed but pointing mostly toward me being right.
Not crowning though. He'll prove it when he proves it. Or not.
Stoops would have pulled the Peterman card, needing 1-2 years to get his guys in here. New scheme, new attitude. Sub 500 record supplemented by Peterman speak, "it's hard to win in this league."
The Doogs swoon when Stoops kicks the best player of the team for the betterment of the program. Then, a change of heart. Presser called.
Brother Mike takes the rains with the program never in better shape. Bobby is thanked for his service. Jen calls him a Dawg for life. Multiple threads on Brand-X with reach arounds for the HOF coach for stepping up when called to serve. Lots of "Woof!" Then the program dips. Again. But our history and legacy of doing it RIGHT
Fuck that
We have some good talent at WR, but these guys aren’t open because they are incredible players. They are wide open because Nothing to anoint yet. I’m optimistic and his track record is very good. Still gotta get it done. So far, it has been a good season, albeit with some warts.