#kanye at the white house
Comments
-
I feel it's more cause you don't know how to read for comprehension. But ok! Nice rant anyways.SFGbob said:
Fuck that strawman's ass Coug. No one is calling you racist simply for calling a black conservative stupid. I love how you keep fucking this chicken all while avoiding what I'm actually saying. For such a "smart" guy you sure argue like a dishonest dumbfuck.creepycoug said:
Why are you so fixated on that point?SFGbob said:Despite your whitewashing of how the term "Uncle Tom" and "Sellout" and "Oreo" as really just a benign way of saying, "hey, I think you're on the wrong team" the reality is that's not the way any of those insults are used today, especially when they're used by white liberals.
Without entirely agreeing with you on it, I've stipulated it because I don't need it.
My point stands w/o having to rationalize those terms.
At this point, you're squeezing blood out of a turnip.
Bottom line is that if you call me a racist for saying Allen West is a dumb fuck for being a staunch right winger, I'm going to tell you to fuck off. If I were black, I'd laff at you and then tell you fuck off.
Nothing more to add on this point; it's beaten to death. -
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists. -
I feel it's more on account of you being a lying moron Hondo. I read for comprehension just fine.2001400ex said:
I feel it's more cause you don't know how to read for comprehension. But ok! Nice rant anyways.SFGbob said:
Fuck that strawman's ass Coug. No one is calling you racist simply for calling a black conservative stupid. I love how you keep fucking this chicken all while avoiding what I'm actually saying. For such a "smart" guy you sure argue like a dishonest dumbfuck.creepycoug said:
Why are you so fixated on that point?SFGbob said:Despite your whitewashing of how the term "Uncle Tom" and "Sellout" and "Oreo" as really just a benign way of saying, "hey, I think you're on the wrong team" the reality is that's not the way any of those insults are used today, especially when they're used by white liberals.
Without entirely agreeing with you on it, I've stipulated it because I don't need it.
My point stands w/o having to rationalize those terms.
At this point, you're squeezing blood out of a turnip.
Bottom line is that if you call me a racist for saying Allen West is a dumb fuck for being a staunch right winger, I'm going to tell you to fuck off. If I were black, I'd laff at you and then tell you fuck off.
Nothing more to add on this point; it's beaten to death. -
-
WTGWT
-
And this brings us back to the original point: that liberal, black or white, criticism of Clarence Thomas is not necessarily, or even likely, 'thinly veiled racism," which was your assertion. Political? Maybe. Or maybe by their own measures they don't think highly of him as an appellate jurist.SFGbob said:
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists.
I really don't know what else to do here. I've made my case abundantly clear. -
People who say racist shit get labeled racist. Give an example of someone criticizing Obama and being called a racist without making a racist comment. You made the claim, now back it up.SFGbob said:
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists. -
Fuck long, fuck hard, fuck strong, the strawman needs love too Coug.creepycoug said:
And this brings us back to the original point: that liberal, black or white, criticism of Clarence Thomas is not necessarily, or even likely, 'thinly veiled racism," which was your assertion. Political? Maybe. Or maybe by their own measures they don't think highly of him as an appellate jurist.SFGbob said:
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists.
I really don't know what else to do here. I've made my case abundantly clear.
What I said was the constant criticism of Thomas intelligence was thinly veiled racism. Now please return to that strawman bunghole, Hondo will be here shortly to tongue your ass.
And none of this has anything to do with the people who call him an Uncle Tom. They aren’t calling him a UT because they don’t think highly of him as a jurist. Never heard them call Scalia an Uncle Tom
-
See my post above yours. I asked you to support your assertion.SFGbob said:
Fuck long, fuck hard, fuck strong, the strawman needs love too Coug.creepycoug said:
And this brings us back to the original point: that liberal, black or white, criticism of Clarence Thomas is not necessarily, or even likely, 'thinly veiled racism," which was your assertion. Political? Maybe. Or maybe by their own measures they don't think highly of him as an appellate jurist.SFGbob said:
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists.
I really don't know what else to do here. I've made my case abundantly clear.
What I said was the constant criticism of Thomas intelligence was thinly veiled racism. Now please return to that strawman bunghole, Hondo will be here shortly to tongue your ass.
And none of this has anything to do with the people who call him an Uncle Tom. They aren’t calling him a UT because they don’t think highly of him as a jurist. Never heard them call Scalia an Uncle Tom -
Why is it thinly veiled racism? Because he's black?SFGbob said:
Fuck long, fuck hard, fuck strong, the strawman needs love too Coug.creepycoug said:
And this brings us back to the original point: that liberal, black or white, criticism of Clarence Thomas is not necessarily, or even likely, 'thinly veiled racism," which was your assertion. Political? Maybe. Or maybe by their own measures they don't think highly of him as an appellate jurist.SFGbob said:
Why do you continue with this pathetic strawman ass fuck Coug? No one is claiming simply calling Allen West a "fuck up" should get you label as a racist. You've been disabused of this bullshit claim of yours at least half a dozen times now and yet here we are again witnessing you mounting the strawman for one more round.creepycoug said:
No more invested than you are at dodging the very same point. Don't bring that shit. A conservative could take a shit on your mom's head and a democrat could come help her clean it up, and you'd find a way to blame the Rats.SFGbob said:
If they "take them to task for it" because they believe that to be an authentic and "real" black person you have to vote for Rats, then yes it is racist and you're heavily invested in dodging that point Coug.creepycoug said:
This is the genesis of your confusion.RaceBannon said:Are Trump policies helping Blacks along with everyone else? Are Black economic indicators at historic highs since Trump took office?
Why shouldn't a Black man vote for Trump? Tell us creep
You assume I'm being political. I'm not. I'm telling you that it's not racist. It could wrong, stupid, mis-informed, right, thoughtful, spot-on, etc. etc.
Black people can vote for Trump. IDRGAF. But if another person takes them to task for it, they're not being racist.
TI just took Kanye to task for it in an interview. They argued about it in-person. TI was not being racist ... at ... all.
As for the substance of your post, I simply cannot find another way to explain it to you. You think I'm being political, but what I'm doing, instead, is as Race put it, being semantical.
I acknowledged that I get where you guys are going with this, which leads us to the very original point in the other thread: people use terms and categorical claims for their own benefit all the time. Conservatives hate, HATE, the over-use of the concept of racism to explain everything. I just find it a bit ironical that they use it to defend Allen West when a black guy tells West he's a fuck up.
Political? Yes. Racist? No. TI wasn't being racist with Kanye; and Kanye wasn't being racist with Bush.
What funny as all hell is that we just spent 8 years under Obama where any criticism no matter how slight did get that person labeled as a racist. "Chicago" "Golf" hell, accurately calling Obama a liar, all would get you branded as a racist by leftists.
I really don't know what else to do here. I've made my case abundantly clear.
What I said was the constant criticism of Thomas intelligence was thinly veiled racism. Now please return to that strawman bunghole, Hondo will be here shortly to tongue your ass.
And none of this has anything to do with the people who call him an Uncle Tom. They aren’t calling him a UT because they don’t think highly of him as a jurist. Never heard them call Scalia an Uncle Tom
Do liberals not ever say white judges or politicians are stupid? What do we call it when they do that?
Face it: you were just crying racism because, in that instance, it was convenient.
I thought playing the race card was lazy.
Sad.




