Republicans vs. Democrats: The Presidents
When Republicans go bad though, they go fucking terrible: Harding (42), Grant (36), Hoover (34) and Nixon (33) - a murderers row of imbeciles and crooks.
DNC throws their heavyweights in first, FDR, widely regarded as the number 2 man of all time, behind Abe. They follow that up with a guy who rates well historically, Harry Truman (6), but is best known for barbequeing a couple hundred thousand Japs with nukes. Next is Woodrow Wilson (07), whose signature accomplishment is giving us the precursor to the UN, the most ineffectual organization in the history of mankind, besides the UW Football AD circa 1994-2012. Andrew Jackson (9) rates favorably, but was actually a huge piece of shit who murdered thousands of Indians. The DNC rounds out the top 10 with JFK, who was a much better fucker of women who were not his wife, than a President, but I respect anyone who banged out Norma Jean.
DNC counters Nixon with Bill Clinton (18), who rates much higher than Nixon but only because society values corruption now. They also feature their own murders row of total losers: Buchanon (43), Pierce (40) and Andrew Johnson (41).
All in all a pretty even list. Piles of low rent losers on both sides, but at the top the DNC features 5 of the top 10, and the GOP only has 3. That said, Lincoln is in a class by himself, and really all the DNC top dogs except FDR are most know for doing horrific shit or fucking hot movie stars.
Edge: GOP.
Yes, Wikipedia was my source. Suck it bitches.
Comments
-
Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
-
The party that fucks movie stars misses the top rating?
I don't even know who you are anymore. -
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
If boobs were still alive he would flag these pre season rankings
-
Where's the link with the rankings?
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_StatesYellowSnow said:Where's the link with the rankings?
Think it's fake news though since political scientists, historians, and other leftist academic types do the rankings. Still interesting. I always love these lists because then I remember nobody even know who half the Presidents were or what they did. -
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
Said the guy who thinks Lexington Green is in Maryland.Sledog said:
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
Adams is critically underrated in IMHO. He's top 10 in the YellowSnow power rankings.Swaye said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_StatesYellowSnow said:Where's the link with the rankings?
Think it's fake news though since political scientists, historians, and other leftist academic types do the rankings. Still interesting. I always love these lists because then I remember nobody even know who half the Presidents were or what they did. -
Sounds like you can't handle the ups and downs of colony bordersYellowSnow said:
Said the guy who thinks Lexington Green is in Maryland.Sledog said:
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
I would have accepted Rhode Island or New Hampshire but cannot abide Maryland.RaceBannon said:
Sounds like you can't handle the ups and downs of colony bordersYellowSnow said:
Said the guy who thinks Lexington Green is in Maryland.Sledog said:
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
-
Woodrow Wilson way the fuck too high.
Otherwise, I don't hate it. -
Said the guy who thinks who is where? I'm completely lost.YellowSnow said:
Said the guy who thinks Lexington Green is in Maryland.Sledog said:
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
Was that wrong? I just, I don't know ...Swaye said:GOP comes out of the gate swinging with the number 1 President of all time, and it is undisputed...Honest Abe Lincoln. They back this strong play up with Teddy Roosevelt (4), best known for charging hills, killing mother fuckers who wanted to fuck with us, and carrying a big ass stick. Eisenhower (8) checks in bigly, by winning the war in Europe, and The Gipper (16 but is coming on strong the further we get away from his time in office)! GOP is really cooking with steam at the top.
When Republicans go bad though, they go fucking terrible: Harding (42), Grant (36), Hoover (34) and Nixon (33) - a murderers row of imbeciles and crooks.
DNC throws their heavyweights in first, FDR, widely regarded as the number 2 man of all time, behind Abe. They follow that up with a guy who rates well historically, Harry Truman (6), but is best known for barbequeing a couple hundred thousand Japs with nukes. Next is Woodrow Wilson (07), whose signature accomplishment is giving us the precursor to the UN, the most ineffectual organization in the history of mankind, besides the UW Football AD circa 1994-2012. Andrew Jackson (9) rates favorably, but was actually a huge piece of shit who murdered thousands of Indians. The DNC rounds out the top 10 with JFK, who was a much better fucker of women who were not his wife, than a President, but I respect anyone who banged out Norma Jean.
DNC counters Nixon with Bill Clinton (18), who rates much higher than Nixon but only because society values corruption now. They also feature their own murders row of total losers: Buchanon (43), Pierce (40) and Andrew Johnson (41).
All in all a pretty even list. Piles of low rent losers on both sides, but at the top the DNC features 5 of the top 10, and the GOP only has 3. That said, Lincoln is in a class by himself, and really all the DNC top dogs except FDR are most know for doing horrific shit or fucking hot movie stars.
Edge: GOP.
Yes, Wikipedia was my source. Suck it bitches. -
One moar: In addition to getting after it like no other president ever, Jack (I like to call him Jack ... it's what I like to do) was a stone cold warrior against the rise of communism. He didn't like pinko faggots who didn't rispeck the private properties.Swaye said:GOP comes out of the gate swinging with the number 1 President of all time, and it is undisputed...Honest Abe Lincoln. They back this strong play up with Teddy Roosevelt (4), best known for charging hills, killing mother fuckers who wanted to fuck with us, and carrying a big ass stick. Eisenhower (8) checks in bigly, by winning the war in Europe, and The Gipper (16 but is coming on strong the further we get away from his time in office)! GOP is really cooking with steam at the top.
When Republicans go bad though, they go fucking terrible: Harding (42), Grant (36), Hoover (34) and Nixon (33) - a murderers row of imbeciles and crooks.
DNC throws their heavyweights in first, FDR, widely regarded as the number 2 man of all time, behind Abe. They follow that up with a guy who rates well historically, Harry Truman (6), but is best known for barbequeing a couple hundred thousand Japs with nukes. Next is Woodrow Wilson (07), whose signature accomplishment is giving us the precursor to the UN, the most ineffectual organization in the history of mankind, besides the UW Football AD circa 1994-2012. Andrew Jackson (9) rates favorably, but was actually a huge piece of shit who murdered thousands of Indians. The DNC rounds out the top 10 with JFK, who was a much better fucker of women who were not his wife, than a President, but I respect anyone who banged out Norma Jean.
DNC counters Nixon with Bill Clinton (18), who rates much higher than Nixon but only because society values corruption now. They also feature their own murders row of total losers: Buchanon (43), Pierce (40) and Andrew Johnson (41).
All in all a pretty even list. Piles of low rent losers on both sides, but at the top the DNC features 5 of the top 10, and the GOP only has 3. That said, Lincoln is in a class by himself, and really all the DNC top dogs except FDR are most know for doing horrific shit or fucking hot movie stars.
Edge: GOP.
Yes, Wikipedia was my source. Suck it bitches. -
No I don't. Got you to read it though. MD is where there is wide spread defiance of their recently enacted "assault weapons" ban. HTHYellowSnow said:
Said the guy who thinks Lexington Green is in Maryland.Sledog said:
Faggy libs are gonna faggy lib.Swaye said:
Sadly the DNC will "rank" much higher (ranking was done by historians and other faggy libs though so go figure) than the GOP. Kennedy is already 10, fucking Johnson! is 13! Carter is low but I can't recall how low, and Clinton is 18 with Obama at 11 (already which is laughable).RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
GOP has Nixon (33), Ford (something low and terrible), Reagan (16), and both Bushes who are low rated. Trump is currently 44, dead last, but they always say you can't view a Presidency in their own time.
Bigly point: DNC will "rate" much higher in the aggregate, but then again, academic elites and such are doing the ratings. So, what do you expect? I'll just use NRA politician rankings from here on out. -
The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ -
Sounds like the Dems need sark to bring them back to respectability
-
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ -
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid. -
Another theory, which I'm somewhat persuaded by, is that their time was up sooner or later for organic reasons, not for Reagan reasons.salemcoog said:
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid.
The theory, which buys Marxism an "out", is this: they rushed into communism w/o going through a full stage of capitalism, which as we all know does wonders to eliminate scarcity. They hopped over capitalism from a feudal system and tried to make it work. The Communist Manifesto supports doing this. The German Ideaology and Das Kapital, do not.
The doctrine of historical materialism and its prediction of a socialist utopia depends a great deal, or entirely, on the concept of technological advancement. You saw this expressed through Soviet Russia's near obsession with doing great public works. The idea is that, once you get to some magical place where technology can eliminate scarcity, people won't have to compete for their existence, and can instead go off and self-actualize, because I guess we call all just wander into these make-believe warehouses and get whatever we need whenever we want to. Whatever. Who's really to say what the world will look like in 1,000 years anyway.
But the basic notion here would be that they tried central planning before they could pull it off. That, and they were surrounded by hostile interests who didn't trade with them and who cut them off economically, or tried to. In the end, the theory goes, Russia's failure was less a failure of communism as a theory, and more a failure of timing. Either way, these people would say Reagan was just at the right place at the right time and drafted behind history.
Creep out. -
I thought communism broke Russia?salemcoog said:
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid. -
A key part of being President is simply to not fuck up and draft up history.creepycoug said:
Another theory, which I'm somewhat persuaded by, is that their time was up sooner or later for organic reasons, not for Reagan reasons.salemcoog said:
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid.
The theory, which buys Marxism an "out", is this: they rushed into communism w/o going through a full stage of capitalism, which as we all know does wonders to eliminate scarcity. They hopped over capitalism from a feudal system and tried to make it work. The Communist Manifesto supports doing this. The German Ideaology and Das Kapital, do not.
The doctrine of historical materialism and its prediction of a socialist utopia depends a great deal, or entirely, on the concept of technological advancement. You saw this expressed through Soviet Russia's near obsession with doing great public works. The idea is that, once you get to some magical place where technology can eliminate scarcity, people won't have to compete for their existence, and can instead go off and self-actualize, because I guess we call all just wander into these make-believe warehouses and get whatever we need whenever we want to. Whatever. Who's really to say what the world will look like in 1,000 years anyway.
But the basic notion here would be that they tried central planning before they could pull it off. That, and they were surrounded by hostile interests who didn't trade with them and who cut them off economically, or tried to. In the end, the theory goes, Russia's failure was less a failure of communism as a theory, and more a failure of timing. Either way, these people would say Reagan was just at the right place at the right time and drafted behind history.
Creep out.
His greatest achievement might have been giving Volckler the political cover needed to end stagflation. -
Reagan had the balls to accelerate their demise.creepycoug said:
Another theory, which I'm somewhat persuaded by, is that their time was up sooner or later for organic reasons, not for Reagan reasons.salemcoog said:
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid.
The theory, which buys Marxism an "out", is this: they rushed into communism w/o going through a full stage of capitalism, which as we all know does wonders to eliminate scarcity. They hopped over capitalism from a feudal system and tried to make it work. The Communist Manifesto supports doing this. The German Ideaology and Das Kapital, do not.
The doctrine of historical materialism and its prediction of a socialist utopia depends a great deal, or entirely, on the concept of technological advancement. You saw this expressed through Soviet Russia's near obsession with doing great public works. The idea is that, once you get to some magical place where technology can eliminate scarcity, people won't have to compete for their existence, and can instead go off and self-actualize, because I guess we call all just wander into these make-believe warehouses and get whatever we need whenever we want to. Whatever. Who's really to say what the world will look like in 1,000 years anyway.
But the basic notion here would be that they tried central planning before they could pull it off. That, and they were surrounded by hostile interests who didn't trade with them and who cut them off economically, or tried to. In the end, the theory goes, Russia's failure was less a failure of communism as a theory, and more a failure of timing. Either way, these people would say Reagan was just at the right place at the right time and drafted behind history.
Creep out.
Other Presidents were pussies.
Except for the aforementioned Jack and Truman ... Truman had balls. -
GOPs have too much down low on the block. Reagan and Ford would just go to town on Carter and Johnson.RaceBannon said:Since 1960 the match up is even
Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama
Nixon, Ford (shouldn't count) Reagan, Bush, Bush. Trump broke the tie
the years were even going into the last election too
And despite having two black guys in Clinton and Obama, Obama can only go left and has that ugly ass cross-face fling shot.
You know George Herbert Walker Bush has a sweet one handed set shot to open up the inside game, too.
Kennedy could off but was prone to back injuries.
Nixon and Trump would use all 10 fouls available.
-
Great list. Except Jackson. Racist.YellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ -
Reagan? lolYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
Reagan did a lot of FS shit and he was basically a total disaster, but how can anyone here forgive him for legitimizing and bringing to the center of American politics the fucking evangelicals?
FFS. -
You at least must respect the bad ass motherfucker. The top two were racists as well by virtue of slave ownership. But props to Jefferson for banging that little tart Sally Hemings.Swaye said:
Great list. Except Jackson. Racist.YellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
Gold Coast slave ship bound for cotton fields
Sold in the market down in New Orleans
Scarred old slaver knows he's doin' all right
Hear him whip the women just around midnight
Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
Drums beatin' cold, English blood runs hot
Lady of the house wonderin' when it's gonna stop
House boy knows that he's doin' all right
You should have heard him just around midnight
Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good
Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should
-
Lincoln was just in the right place at the right time.creepycoug said:
Another theory, which I'm somewhat persuaded by, is that their time was up sooner or later for organic reasons, not for Reagan reasons.salemcoog said:
He broke the Russians.HardlyClothed said:
Reagan was garbageYellowSnow said:The Official YellowSnow POTUS Top 10
1) Lincoln
2) Worshtington
3) Teddy
4) FDR
5) Jefferson
6) Adams
7) Jackson
8) Reagan
9) Truman
10) LBJ
For that alone he gets the at large bid.
The theory, which buys Marxism an "out", is this: they rushed into communism w/o going through a full stage of capitalism, which as we all know does wonders to eliminate scarcity. They hopped over capitalism from a feudal system and tried to make it work. The Communist Manifesto supports doing this. The German Ideaology and Das Kapital, do not.
The doctrine of historical materialism and its prediction of a socialist utopia depends a great deal, or entirely, on the concept of technological advancement. You saw this expressed through Soviet Russia's near obsession with doing great public works. The idea is that, once you get to some magical place where technology can eliminate scarcity, people won't have to compete for their existence, and can instead go off and self-actualize, because I guess we call all just wander into these make-believe warehouses and get whatever we need whenever we want to. Whatever. Who's really to say what the world will look like in 1,000 years anyway.
But the basic notion here would be that they tried central planning before they could pull it off. That, and they were surrounded by hostile interests who didn't trade with them and who cut them off economically, or tried to. In the end, the theory goes, Russia's failure was less a failure of communism as a theory, and more a failure of timing. Either way, these people would say Reagan was just at the right place at the right time and drafted behind history.
Creep out.
Washington was just in the right place at the right time.
FDR was just in the right place at the right time.
Timing is a massive fucking part of legacy. You still have to capitalize on it though.
