Someone needs to stop Pete
Comments
-
In puppydoog's defense, Peterman could be 8-5 forever at UW without worrying about his job.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
-
It blows my mind that someone who comes up with gems like "Canaduh" mocks those who love "Chincredible".Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They both can stay in Canaduh along with Sum 41 and Avril Lavigne. IDGAF about Drake that much, but he seems like kind of a poser.allpurpleallgold said:Drake is no Bieber.
-
"Fine" means shut your splitskinny and see what happens. Im 100% confident in Pete, which is why I dont pop blood vessel's in my cunt everytime Pete has a poor 2-minute series, in game 2 of his 2nd year during a massive rebuilding process. If you knew a good god damned thing about football you'd just shut your hole until Petersen can field a competitive team. Takes a few years potlicker. Doesnt happen in 2 years. Good, now zip your tender lips and wait.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
-
Great coaches win natties in two years at a new job, but still.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
"Fine" means shut your splitskinny and see what happens. Im 100% confident in Pete, which is why I dont pop blood vessel's in my cunt everytime Pete has a poor 2-minute series, in game 2 of his 2nd year during a massive rebuilding process. If you knew a good god damned thing about football you'd just shut your hole until Petersen can field a competitive team. Takes a few years potlicker. Doesnt happen in 2 years. Good, now zip your tender lips and wait.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
-
Huh?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great coaches win natties in two years at a new job, but still.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
"Fine" means shut your splitskinny and see what happens. Im 100% confident in Pete, which is why I dont pop blood vessel's in my cunt everytime Pete has a poor 2-minute series, in game 2 of his 2nd year during a massive rebuilding process. If you knew a good god damned thing about football you'd just shut your hole until Petersen can field a competitive team. Takes a few years potlicker. Doesnt happen in 2 years. Good, now zip your tender lips and wait.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
-
Never heard of Bob Stoops or Jim Tressel?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Huh?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Great coaches win natties in two years at a new job, but still.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
"Fine" means shut your splitskinny and see what happens. Im 100% confident in Pete, which is why I dont pop blood vessel's in my cunt everytime Pete has a poor 2-minute series, in game 2 of his 2nd year during a massive rebuilding process. If you knew a good god damned thing about football you'd just shut your hole until Petersen can field a competitive team. Takes a few years potlicker. Doesnt happen in 2 years. Good, now zip your tender lips and wait.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
Some greats take three years though to be fair. -
I also like to be puppydoog fucking stupid and claim a minor drop in conference record is a massive rebuild job, even after my fucking stupid hypothesis has been blown up by a basic examination of the 2014 Huskies football schedule.
-
Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma -
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma -
Helfrich and Shaw win in this league and they aren't even good. The south is a joke.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma -
Tommy stick to Seattle cuisine and up-and-coming DJ's.. Its like Pup talking next weeks pioneer square art walk. Please, not here Tommi (your new club spelling. you transferred the HIV too many times under Thomas.) Cell phones under that spelling are stuffed, time to go incognito. Im in on the plan man;)ThomasFremont said:
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma -
Is whatever disease you have transferable too?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Tommy stick to Seattle cuisine and up-and-coming DJ's.. Its like Pup talking next weeks pioneer square art walk. Please, not here Tommi (your new club spelling. you transferred the HIV too many times under Thomas.) Cell phones under that spelling are stuffed, time to go incognito. Im in on the plan man;)ThomasFremont said:
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma had been pretty bad before Stoops. His down years are 10 win seasons. What has he done the past 8 seasons? Made a few BCS bowls, won a couple conference titles, and he has the program lined up for another run. He gets a little slack because he's won a title and made two others.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma
Pete shouldn't get slack because he hasn't done shit at UW. NOGAF about what he did at Boise State anymore. That was a long time ago. And guess what? His offenses (his supposed specialty) fell off his last years there once Kellen Moore graduated.
He will get at least 5 years, we all realize that. You are missing the point.
Sooner fans actually get upset about those "down" 10 win seasons. 10 wins at UW will get you a lifetime extension because of shit fans like you who have low standards.
Go get some more info from Dick Baird and report back. You don't know dick about football. -
Great counter-argument.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Tommy stick to Seattle cuisine and up-and-coming DJ's.. Its like Pup talking next weeks pioneer square art walk. Please, not here Tommi (your new club spelling. you transferred the HIV too many times under Thomas.) Cell phones under that spelling are stuffed, time to go incognito. Im in on the plan man;)ThomasFremont said:
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma
Finally, the football talk is rolling! -
Just not with you of courseThomasFremont said:
Great counter-argument.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Tommy stick to Seattle cuisine and up-and-coming DJ's.. Its like Pup talking next weeks pioneer square art walk. Please, not here Tommi (your new club spelling. you transferred the HIV too many times under Thomas.) Cell phones under that spelling are stuffed, time to go incognito. Im in on the plan man;)ThomasFremont said:
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma
Finally, the football talk is rolling! -
Now slip into your little onesie thereTommi and get to bed. Uncle Pup will type you a bed time story.
-
You're still hapring on that?DerekJohnson said:
It blows my mind that someone who comes up with gems like "Canaduh" mocks those who love "Chincredible".Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They both can stay in Canaduh along with Sum 41 and Avril Lavigne. IDGAF about Drake that much, but he seems like kind of a poser.allpurpleallgold said:Drake is no Bieber.
Difference is, if I had a message board, there wouldn't be a Canaduh button. I also don't write "Canaduh" dozens of times a week like people here who think Chincredible is George Carlin greatest hits material. -
Uhhh... Who are the top 3 coaches in the conference?RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
1) David Shaw
2) ????
3) ????
-
Good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Just not with you of courseThomasFremont said:
Great counter-argument.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Tommy stick to Seattle cuisine and up-and-coming DJ's.. Its like Pup talking next weeks pioneer square art walk. Please, not here Tommi (your new club spelling. you transferred the HIV too many times under Thomas.) Cell phones under that spelling are stuffed, time to go incognito. Im in on the plan man;)ThomasFremont said:
He can't even win 9 per year in the Pac-12 with the most watered down OOC schedule in school history.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma
Finally, the football talk is rolling!
Your brand of football talk belongs over at Doogman.
Run along, boy. -
Helfrich made the CFP title game.Passion said:
Uhhh... Who are the top 3 coaches in the conference?RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
1) David Shaw
2) ????
3) ????
Graham and Helton have won division titles.
Peterman hasn't even kept up with Sark. -
Huh?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
"Fine" means shut your splitskinny and see what happens. Im 100% confident in Pete, which is why I dont pop blood vessel's in my cunt everytime Pete has a poor 2-minute series, in game 2 of his 2nd year during a massive rebuilding process. If you knew a good god damned thing about football you'd just shut your hole until Petersen can field a competitive team. Takes a few years potlicker. Doesnt happen in 2 years. Good, now zip your tender lips and wait.RoadDawg55 said:
We have different definitions of "fine." 8 wins is fine to you because you're a true retard who thinks Petersen inherited a 4 win team.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Unbun your cunt 55, relax, Pete will be just fine at UW.RoadDawg55 said:
Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.puppylove_sugarsteel said:When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.
There were huge holes in the depth chart but massive rebuild?
Even under Ty and Gilby, UW has had the talent to win 4-6 games every year. Coaching matters. -
I like to criticize a coach for winning his conference and making the CFP, but fully support my own coach winning 7-8 games in year 3 with a charmin soft schedule. I do that.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Uh baabs, this aint tOSU. DING DING DING! What has stoops done the last 8 years (not counting the ass fuckings in playoff)? And in Tressels case, cheating doesnt prosper. Pete got to 92-12 the right way and is still coaching. $toops got to playoff because of the politics of the new playoffs, the big12 snub prior. Hardly a head coach id gloat about.
When Pete has his roster intact he'll win 10/year in an 8-team league, not a 3-team league like the big12. And he wont have an 8-year insignificance drought in said 3-team league. Lot harder to win in pac. Pete would win 11 games per @ Oklahoma -
In a parallel universe your message board does have a Canaduh button. Probably one for Alabummer too.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You're still hapring on that?DerekJohnson said:
It blows my mind that someone who comes up with gems like "Canaduh" mocks those who love "Chincredible".Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They both can stay in Canaduh along with Sum 41 and Avril Lavigne. IDGAF about Drake that much, but he seems like kind of a poser.allpurpleallgold said:Drake is no Bieber.
Difference is, if I had a message board, there wouldn't be a Canaduh button. I also don't write "Canaduh" dozens of times a week like people here who think Chincredible is George Carlin greatest hits material. -
Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.
Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.
Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.
Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke. -
Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.NEsnake12 said:Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.
Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.
Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.
Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke. -
Chincredibled for Doog honesty.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.NEsnake12 said:Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.
Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.
Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.
Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.
UW doesn't give a fuck about winning. Puppy is dialed in on the truth here. -
?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.NEsnake12 said:Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.
Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.
Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.
Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke. -
That's why I say deserves to and not will. Romar's continued employment tells that story loud and clear.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.NEsnake12 said:Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.
Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.
Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.
Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke. -
Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?
