Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Someone needs to stop Pete

1235711

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Passion said:

    When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.

    Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.
    Uhhh... Who are the top 3 coaches in the conference?

    1) David Shaw
    2) ????
    3) ????

    Helfrich made the CFP title game.

    Graham and Helton have won division titles.

    Peterman hasn't even kept up with Sark.
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
    Chincredibled for Doog honesty.

    UW doesn't give a fuck about winning. Puppy is dialed in on the truth here.
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792

    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
    That's why I say deserves to and not will. Romar's continued employment tells that story loud and clear.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,350

    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
    Chincredibled for Doog honesty.

    UW doesn't give a fuck about winning. Puppy is dialed in on the truth here.
    luckily Peterman does give a fuck about winning, and will LEAVE! if he doesn't get an environment that enables it
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

    Ty and Sark both should have been fired after year 3.

    Doogs hate history, facts, and winning.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
    Chincredibled for Doog honesty.

    UW doesn't give a fuck about winning. Puppy is dialed in on the truth here.
    luckily Peterman does give a fuck about winning, and will LEAVE! if he doesn't get an environment that enables it
    He came to UW which proves he cares more about the paycheck than he cares about winning.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    5 years bitches...get used to it.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    5 years bitches...get used to it.

    Hi. Take that argument to http://www.dawgman.com where it came from and where it belongs.

    You're plagiarism Kim's shit.
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,350

    NEsnake12 said:

    Comparing Helfrich to Petersen is fucking dumb. Helf was Oregons OC and didn't have to completely overhaul the system coming in like Petersen did, and also didn't have to deal with massive attrition that left holes in the depth chart.

    Helf did have 2 really good years to start, but once all of Chip's main talent started leaving he got exposed. Oregons defense has gotten worse and worse, recruiting hasn't been bringing in the same level of talent as in the Chip era, and QB development has been a dubstep fire.

    Pete had enough talent to do better than he did, and bad coahing cost 3-5 more losses than there should've been. BUT it's fucking dumb to assume he inherited a situation as good as Helfrich. There should be some gap between the expectations.

    Overall though, both Pete and Helf deserve the axe after this year if they do any worse than 9-3. Pete needs to prove his system can win now that it's all in place, and Helf needs to make last year's train wreck seem like a fluke.

    Good thing is that wont happen @ UW aunty. He'll get 5 years even if he goes 6-7, and deservedly so.
    Chincredibled for Doog honesty.

    UW doesn't give a fuck about winning. Puppy is dialed in on the truth here.
    luckily Peterman does give a fuck about winning, and will LEAVE! if he doesn't get an environment that enables it
    He came to UW which proves he cares more about the paycheck than he cares about winning.
    no way to prove it, but disagree.

    we'll find out at the end of this season when its not 11 wins, if Pete starts talking about character development and how white guys from Yuba City only get the most downtrodden programs.

    EWIWBI
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    5 years bitches...get used to it.

    Hi. Take that argument to http://www.dawgman.com where it came from and where it belongs.

    You're plagiarism Kim's shit.
    Not an argument, its a FACT. And puppy loves it
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,803
    This thread delivers until it doesn't.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    5 years bitches...get used to it.

    Hi. Take that argument to http://www.dawgman.com where it came from and where it belongs.

    You're plagiarism Kim's shit.
    Not an argument, its a FACT. And puppy loves it
    Of course you love it.

    You hate winners.
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,366

    Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

    Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.
Sign In or Register to comment.