How many games do OUR mighty DAWGS need to win next year
Comments
-
Any dipshit can call plays. Give that dipshit Stanford's roster and see if said dipshit is still sucking hind teat.
in engrish: UW, Pete and jonny have a 4-win roster (because of youth not talent). That will change, so to your opinions on jonny smitts -
I'm already a Bama fan
I bet you do, cutiepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh Tommy I love it when you waive your finger at me, hand on hip and flaming hostileThomasFremont said:
-
8-99 because 9-3 is a good record.
Eight is too close to mediocrity with the WAC teams we play out of conference every year. Sark won eight...but it only gave me an 8-9 option... -
8-9
Why only seven? They're not going to be so young next year. It's not a massive rebuild job.puppylove_sugarsteel said:He needs to win 7
-
I'm already a Bama fan
Sugar Steve is a massive Doog, that's whyFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Why only seven? They're not going to be so young next year. It's not a massive rebuild job.puppylove_sugarsteel said:He needs to win 7
-
I'm already a Bama fanPLSS, go back to forcefully invading the bung regions of you Boy Scout troop. LEAVE real football talk to us manly men ya boofcunt. Back to squeezin your fat body into mesh thigh highs and halter tops. Hit the streets Ru Puppy!
-
8-9
This. Its not even being an asshole either. We know how this shit works. Browning will get injured. Or maybe the defense has two or three injuries. No matter the case, there will be "context" for why Petersen only won 7 and why 2017 will be special.RaceBannon said:
Who the fuck are you kidding? You'll suck his dick when he wins 7 and tell us about 2017 being the yearTequilla said:
Pretty much this ...CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I'm to the point where I just can't argue anymore about Smith and Petersen. He'll either fire Smith this offseason, do an offensive overhaul and keep Smith, or stay the same. Either way, he needs to win 9+ for me next year and compete for the North late into the season. I think they can win the north next year, it's not out of the question for me.
Either way, it will be interesting, or not.
But with a weak non-conference schedule that should ensure 3-0, I'd be mildly disappointed with a 6-3 conference record. I'd put the o/u at 9.5 wins for next year and then should we end at 9 wins look back on how we got there. Barring a massive run of injuries, etc. (which you could argue is on Petersen anyway from a depth perspective), 8 or less would be a significant disappointment. -
I have a feeling this shitty poll will be rolled out once again this time next year as noodle arm doesn't meet expectations.
Same argument: if Pete doesn't win 9 or 10 games next year and compete for the North then fire him at the 50.
But of course he won't be fired and then we can wait for this poll the next year. -
I'm already a Bama fanjecornel said:
I have a feeling this shitty poll will be rolled out once again this time next year as noodle arm doesn't meet expectations.
Same argument: if Pete doesn't win 9 or 10 games next year and compete for the North then fire him at the 50.
But of course he won't be fired and then we can wait for this poll the next year.
-
NATTY
shitty poll > shitty poasters > little jimmyjecornel said:I have a feeling this shitty poll will be rolled out once again this time next year as noodle arm doesn't meet expectations.
Same argument: if Pete doesn't win 9 or 10 games next year and compete for the North then fire him at the 50.
But of course he won't be fired and then we can wait for this poll the next year.
