Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Taking the temperature of the room
Comments
-
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark -
Trump was trying to turn the board over but soft assed simpleminded cucks like Dazzler bought the propaganda and couldn't see the bigger picture. And still today this idiot comes here flapping his gums as if anything that comes out of his lying pie hole matters.
Dazzler, you voted for Biden, STFU and go sit in the corner. -
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference? -
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
-
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing -
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
Candy ass Biden voter.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark -
And the sewing circle's chief academic weighs in.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
Candy ass Biden voter.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark -
Smart enough not to vote for Biden. And you?HHusky said:
And the sewing circle's chief academic weighs in.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
Candy ass Biden voter.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark -
Along with Biden & Hillary ball-washer @HHusky.HHusky said:
And the sewing circle's chief academic weighs in.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
Candy ass Biden voter.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark -
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me -
Like I said, the dazzler sucks at this. Booze and cocaine were legal in 1789. And then later it wasn't. The dazzler's Roe decision would read, "Abortion wasn't illegal in 1789 and so it is a right retained by the people and can't be limited." No one asserted that that the 36 states that had substantial restrictions on alcohol prior to the 18th Amendment were unconstitutionally restricting drinking alcohol. That's because the states retained the right to police their citizens. In 1789 even after the ratification of the Constitution and the First Amendment, the states had the right to establish a state church if they wanted. That's how far state rights went.RaceBannon said:
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me -
-
Prohibiting reproductive choice is exactly like prohibiting people from doing cocaine (cocaine use being a YUGE issue for the US in 1789), of course.WestlinnDuck said:
Like I said, the dazzler sucks at this. Booze and cocaine were legal in 1789. And then later it wasn't. The dazzler's Roe decision would read, "Abortion wasn't illegal in 1789 and so it is a right retained by the people and can't be limited." No one asserted that that the 36 states that had substantial restrictions on alcohol prior to the 18th Amendment were unconstitutionally restricting drinking alcohol. That's because the states retained the right to police their citizens. In 1789 even after the ratification of the Constitution and the First Amendment, the states had the right to establish a state church if they wanted. That's how far state rights went.RaceBannon said:
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me
#PoliceTheUterus
supposed libertarians are funny -
Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.
-
If only there was a cheap, safe and effective way to prevent pregnancy in the first place. Oh well, we can always dream.Prestonluv said:
It’s a net negative for society. More poor people having babies only hurts the whole in the long run.PurpleThrobber said:
Overturning Roe was RIGHT for a plethora of reasons.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
Abortion is not a Constitutional right. It's not whether 1 poor mother terminates a pregnancy or 1,000,000 poor mothers terminate pregnancies. It's not about the pragmatic approach to poverty. It's about Constitutional law.
The SCOTUS assigned the task of determining legality and terms of abortion back to the states where it rightfully belongs. This helps the right in the long run - as without that determination, everything else they stand for can be overturned and mandated at the federal level.
You'll note the democratic controlled House and Senate haven't touched the third rail of abortion either - because they know misdefinition of the allowable term of abortion puts them in a corner. They lose their extreme leftists by putting limits on when abortion is allowable, they look like baby killers if they don't.
I’m not even focusing on women’s rights, I’m focusing on what’s best for society as a whole in our current climate.
Who do you think is taking care of these poor peoples babies? The taxpayers are bearing the financial burden. Society is paying the criminal burden.
Many of the parents who get abortions don’t deserve to have babies anyway and now many will have them. Put two and two together on that bad boy.
Lets force a poor drug addicted 19 year old in certain states to bring a baby into this world. Makes complete sense…..we can talk about the constitution or states rights all we want but it’s a net negative for society as a whole. -
If they were already "children", you could remove them and take them and take them on vacation to Disneyland.Sledog said:Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.
#FetusFetish -
Oh so it has to be EXACTLYHHusky said:
Prohibiting reproductive choice is exactly like prohibiting people from doing cocaine (cocaine use being a YUGE issue for the US in 1789), of course.WestlinnDuck said:
Like I said, the dazzler sucks at this. Booze and cocaine were legal in 1789. And then later it wasn't. The dazzler's Roe decision would read, "Abortion wasn't illegal in 1789 and so it is a right retained by the people and can't be limited." No one asserted that that the 36 states that had substantial restrictions on alcohol prior to the 18th Amendment were unconstitutionally restricting drinking alcohol. That's because the states retained the right to police their citizens. In 1789 even after the ratification of the Constitution and the First Amendment, the states had the right to establish a state church if they wanted. That's how far state rights went.RaceBannon said:
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me
#PoliceTheUterus
supposed libertarians are funny
Fuck off -
It's called limited federal government. Your "feelings" that abortion was a Constitutional right retained by the people, but that the first and second amendment can be severally restrained and that you get to pick and choose was rights were retained is just pure authoritarian fascism. The written word becomes meaningless and our rights are dependent on fascists like the dazzler.HHusky said:
Prohibiting reproductive choice is exactly like prohibiting people from doing cocaine (cocaine use being a YUGE issue for the US in 1789), of course.WestlinnDuck said:
Like I said, the dazzler sucks at this. Booze and cocaine were legal in 1789. And then later it wasn't. The dazzler's Roe decision would read, "Abortion wasn't illegal in 1789 and so it is a right retained by the people and can't be limited." No one asserted that that the 36 states that had substantial restrictions on alcohol prior to the 18th Amendment were unconstitutionally restricting drinking alcohol. That's because the states retained the right to police their citizens. In 1789 even after the ratification of the Constitution and the First Amendment, the states had the right to establish a state church if they wanted. That's how far state rights went.RaceBannon said:
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me
#PoliceTheUterus
supposed libertarians are funny -
Very fascist to recognize unenumerated rights, of course.WestlinnDuck said:
It's called limited federal government. Your "feelings" that abortion was a Constitutional right retained by the people, but that the first and second amendment can be severally restrained and that you get to pick and choose was rights were retained is just pure authoritarian fascism. The written word becomes meaningless and our rights are dependent on fascists like the dazzler.HHusky said:
Prohibiting reproductive choice is exactly like prohibiting people from doing cocaine (cocaine use being a YUGE issue for the US in 1789), of course.WestlinnDuck said:
Like I said, the dazzler sucks at this. Booze and cocaine were legal in 1789. And then later it wasn't. The dazzler's Roe decision would read, "Abortion wasn't illegal in 1789 and so it is a right retained by the people and can't be limited." No one asserted that that the 36 states that had substantial restrictions on alcohol prior to the 18th Amendment were unconstitutionally restricting drinking alcohol. That's because the states retained the right to police their citizens. In 1789 even after the ratification of the Constitution and the First Amendment, the states had the right to establish a state church if they wanted. That's how far state rights went.RaceBannon said:
I'm rightHHusky said:
sadly, I think you're being honest hereRaceBannon said:
NoHHusky said:
and not mandatoryRaceBannon said:
You live in a state where abortion is legalHHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
see the difference?
If it's illegal it's not mandatory either
refreshing, yet disappointing
There's no right to abortion
It was in all the papers
Your usual trip into the weeds doesn't change that
All sorts of things are illegal.
Fuck off
If states agree with Prestonluv that abortion is good public policy nothing prohibits it
Defending democracy every day. That's me
#PoliceTheUterus
supposed libertarians are funny
-
I'm sure Race will agree, telling you to fuck off is Open Source.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark
Fuck off.
-
Everyone says sopawz said:
I'm sure Race will agree, telling you to fuck off is Open Source.HHusky said:
pay Race his royalty.46XiJCAB said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:
Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.WestlinnDuck said:
By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.HHusky said:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.WestlinnDuck said:
As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.Prestonluv said:Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.
Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.
Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.
This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.
#trademark
Fuck off. -
He adheres to the narrative and talking points.Sledog said:Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.
Like a good little Stooge. -
-
I didn't mean to frighten you.46XiJCAB said: -
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
-
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well. -
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
