Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Taking the temperature of the room
Comments
-
He does.hardhat said:
I didn't assume that you were upset, you said it was good. I don't need to check myself. In a normal world, a 'christian satire site' would probably have a small audience. But the intolerant left have made themselves such easy targets that it's surprisingly popular. I don't know if he takes himself too seriously, I haven't met him.HHusky said:
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
It's why the Babylon Bee is occasionally funny but isn't usually. -
Somewhat back on subject has Chuckie Schumer complained about democrats candidates like the wife abuser in Georgia or does he attack the GOP candidates?
What the fuck is Mitch's problem?
Rhetorical -
We realize it often hurts your snatch, madam.HHusky said:
He does.hardhat said:
I didn't assume that you were upset, you said it was good. I don't need to check myself. In a normal world, a 'christian satire site' would probably have a small audience. But the intolerant left have made themselves such easy targets that it's surprisingly popular. I don't know if he takes himself too seriously, I haven't met him.HHusky said:
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
It's why the Babylon Bee is occasionally funny but isn't usually. -
There are consequences with every pregnancy Mr Puritan. Dumb fuckHHusky said:
People are having sex and there need to be consequences!PurpleThrobber said:Dazzler likes chirping about reproductive ‘choice’ but fails to mention assumption of risk.
Allowing an unwrapped dick into a non contraception protected vag has the potential to produce a human.
Thats the ultimate pro choice option. Choose wisely.
Or understand there may not be a get out of jail free card in your locale.
If you can’t grasp the consequences of ones actions, perhaps try carrying some hashish through customs in Russia.
A Puritanical take by PT. Interesting. Well . . . more interesting than usual, at least. -
Your reading comprehension is as bad as your legal analysis.HHusky said:
People are having sex and there need to be consequences!PurpleThrobber said:Dazzler likes chirping about reproductive ‘choice’ but fails to mention assumption of risk.
Allowing an unwrapped dick into a non contraception protected vag has the potential to produce a human.
Thats the ultimate pro choice option. Choose wisely.
Or understand there may not be a get out of jail free card in your locale.
If you can’t grasp the consequences of ones actions, perhaps try carrying some hashish through customs in Russia.
A Puritanical take by PT. Interesting. Well . . . more interesting than usual, at least.
-
You just keep proving my point. Babylon Bee triggers the woke idiots and they big mad.HHusky said:
He does.hardhat said:
I didn't assume that you were upset, you said it was good. I don't need to check myself. In a normal world, a 'christian satire site' would probably have a small audience. But the intolerant left have made themselves such easy targets that it's surprisingly popular. I don't know if he takes himself too seriously, I haven't met him.HHusky said:
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
It's why the Babylon Bee is occasionally funny but isn't usually. -
I'm sure some are triggered by it.hardhat said:
You just keep proving my point. Babylon Bee triggers the woke idiots and they big mad.HHusky said:
He does.hardhat said:
I didn't assume that you were upset, you said it was good. I don't need to check myself. In a normal world, a 'christian satire site' would probably have a small audience. But the intolerant left have made themselves such easy targets that it's surprisingly popular. I don't know if he takes himself too seriously, I haven't met him.HHusky said:
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
It's why the Babylon Bee is occasionally funny but isn't usually.
I just think it's rarely funny. -
Oz is a very poor candidate a Trump special46XiJCAB said:
Mitch is going to leave Oz out to dry because he won't promise to wash his balls. Instead PA gets this loser and we get him for 6 years in the US Senate and Mitch is fine with that.RaceBannon said:Back to the horrible GOP candidates
Nevermind
Uniparty today
Uniparty tomorrow
Uniparty FOREVER
It's a game folks. And we're the pawns. -
RaceBannon said:
Somewhat back on subject has Chuckie Schumer complained about democrats candidates like the wife abuser in Georgia or does he attack the GOP candidates?
What the fuck is Mitch's problem?
Rhetorical
Mitch wants Walker to lose more than Warnock does.RaceBannon said:Somewhat back on subject has Chuckie Schumer complained about democrats candidates like the wife abuser in Georgia or does he attack the GOP candidates?
What the fuck is Mitch's problem?
Rhetorical -
Bee is greatHHusky said:
He does.hardhat said:
I didn't assume that you were upset, you said it was good. I don't need to check myself. In a normal world, a 'christian satire site' would probably have a small audience. But the intolerant left have made themselves such easy targets that it's surprisingly popular. I don't know if he takes himself too seriously, I haven't met him.HHusky said:
If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.hardhat said:
Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.HHusky said:
Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.hardhat said:
Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.
By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.
It's why the Babylon Bee is occasionally funny but isn't usually.
