Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
New Poll Shows Almost HALF Of Women Want To Stay HOME, Not Work
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,229 
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8U7qU9410YComments
-
Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad. -
The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad. -
Fuck Off loser.HHusky said:
The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad. -
If women would go back to taking care of kids and houses for their hubbies - then the unemployment issue would be null and void. I always say "get your biscuits in the oven and your buns in the bed"
-
Well reasoned.haie said:
Fuck Off loser.HHusky said:
The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.
But wordy. -
Fuck Off loserHHusky said:
Well reasoned.haie said:
Fuck Off loser.HHusky said:
The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad.
But wordy. -
Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
Dual income households didn’t pass single income households until the 80s. Guess who was president then.SFGbob said:
Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
False.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
-
@BearsWiin, true?TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
Your attempt to revise history is again an epic fail. Women in the late 60's and 70's were burning their bras and demanding equal rights and opportunities.TheKobeStopper said:
Dual income households didn’t pass single income households until the 80s. Guess who was president then.SFGbob said:
Both people having to work has been a staple of American life since the 70s.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
By the 80's women were making inroads in professions outside of traditional roles of secretaries, nurses and teachers. So, yes, Reagan was President when huge strides were made in recognizing the distaff sex were fully capable of doing the same jobs traditionally reserved for men as the economy exploded.
You may also recall Reagan appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court in his first year in office.
Or are you as big a misogynist as the Dazzler?
-
about what I expected from a Seattle liberal like youHHusky said:
The Nineteenth Century is asking for its domestic policy back.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Women are more fulfilled when they raise children at home. The children also turn out better in adulthood. Leftists hate that.
I know a few women in their 30s and 40s who abuse the booze and use dogs as surrogate children. All divorced or have picked some losers multiple times. Really, it's sad. -
If Dimocrats acted like they did in the 70s, I'd support them.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
They don't. They sold out decades ago. Now it's all woke and feminist bullshit and carrying water for China and the one percent. Sad. -
TheKobeStopper said:
Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.
My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.
I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.
40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it
My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.
When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.
Easy peasy.
I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice
-
The woke shit stays. There’s bullshit like manspreading, science is white supremacy, black people cant be racist, there’s dumb shit for sure. And then you’ve got the libs painting BLM and rainbows on bombs we drop on kids. But one of our biggest concerns class reductionism. We do not believe that all oppression is a byproduct of class so racial justice, lgbtq rights, we’re not leaving those behind.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If Dimocrats acted like they did in the 70s, I'd support them.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
They don't. They sold out decades ago. Now it's all woke and feminist bullshit and carrying water for China and the one percent. Sad.
My experience with the left, and I mean Bernie/AOC and over, is most of the woke shit that gets amplified isn’t what we believe in but some of it is. If that’s a deal breaker, then that’s too bad. But we’ll always have room for you if you change your mind. -
Most mass/school shooters come from a single mom or a broken family
It’s true -
Are you suggesting we pass common sense stay at home mom reform?HuskyJW said:Most mass/school shooters come from a single mom or a broken family
It’s true -
Boom. You nailed the plan. It's the secret for raising good kids. My wife and I did same thing. I just wasn't quite as impoverished as you, lol. Wife works now just to have something to do. Kids 24, 21. Damn near perfect kids.Prestonluv said:TheKobeStopper said:
Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.
My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.
I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.
40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it
My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.
When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.
Easy peasy.
I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/10/09/millennials-own-less-than-5percent-of-all-us-wealth.htmlPrestonluv said:TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.
My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.
I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.
40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it
My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.
When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.
Easy peasy.
I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-birthrate-decline-millennials-delay-having-kids-2019-5?amp
https://agranato.medium.com/can-a-millennial-single-earner-support-a-traditional-middle-class-family-8a1e2fee20be
This last one is trying to create the best, cleanest, in a vacuum scenario for can millennial parents live a middle class life with kids on a single income and when they gets there, they says this.
Actually implementing this in real life would require very strong patience and discipline. This would mean virtually no eating at restaurants, international travel, or expensive purchases in general, including in years that are several years before actually having children in order to build up a substantial nest egg. It would require that they consistently be able to get raises that exceed inflation and not have any substantial period of unemployment. In other words, it would require substantial luck and willingness to pinch pennies for decades. But if you have a bachelor’s degree and run the table, the numbers do work.
No, for most of us it is not a choice between dual incomes and struggling a little bit. Even in your worthless, anecdotal life story, your wife still eventually got a part time job. It is a dual income economy if you want kids. That is what the numbers show. -
Pretty sure those are already illegal.HuskyJW said: -
I know you are being sarcastic but I was being sarcasticPurpleThrobber said: -
Dual incomes are more necessary in your liberal sanctuaries. But your ignorance is noted.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
We can’t all get paid to not grow food and live in 5 bedroom $100,000 homes. Some of us actually need to drive the economy of the worlds superpower.greenblood said:
Dual incomes are more necessary in your liberal sanctuaries. But your ignorance is noted.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously. -
JFC - Biden get elected and TKS thinks the world is going to change
4 years from now nothing will have changed - life and death go on. and us little folks get fucked by government -
We are a dual income household, with mom working from home for the foreseeable future. It would be easy to manage if kids were in school and had access to summer camps and sports.
As things are now, it ain’t easy....but living in woke King Co ain’t cheap these days. Gotta work hard so that other people can have their free needles. -
She got the job mainly for adult interaction.TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/10/09/millennials-own-less-than-5percent-of-all-us-wealth.htmlPrestonluv said:TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.
My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.
I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.
40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it
My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.
When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.
Easy peasy.
I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-birthrate-decline-millennials-delay-having-kids-2019-5?amp
https://agranato.medium.com/can-a-millennial-single-earner-support-a-traditional-middle-class-family-8a1e2fee20be
This last one is trying to create the best, cleanest, in a vacuum scenario for can millennial parents live a middle class life with kids on a single income and when they gets there, they says this.
Actually implementing this in real life would require very strong patience and discipline. This would mean virtually no eating at restaurants, international travel, or expensive purchases in general, including in years that are several years before actually having children in order to build up a substantial nest egg. It would require that they consistently be able to get raises that exceed inflation and not have any substantial period of unemployment. In other words, it would require substantial luck and willingness to pinch pennies for decades. But if you have a bachelor’s degree and run the table, the numbers do work.
No, for most of us it is not a choice between dual incomes and struggling a little bit. Even in your worthless, anecdotal life story, your wife still eventually got a part time job. It is a dual income economy if you want kids. That is what the numbers show.
By the time she got it I was making more money.
We lived in a 900 square foot home. We never went out. We didn't go on a vacation until they were 7 and 10. We never did anything expensive. We shopped at low income stores and got our clothes from garage sales in upper class neighborhoods.
We had one car and no financial help from anyone.
You can post all the links you want. I lived it in one of the richest cities on the face of this earth. -
You really aren’t that simple minded are you?TheKobeStopper said:
We can’t all get paid to not grow food and live in 5 bedroom $100,000 homes. Some of us actually need to drive the economy of the worlds superpower.greenblood said:
Dual incomes are more necessary in your liberal sanctuaries. But your ignorance is noted.TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
Point being, take this up with your baby girl AOC, as her district is one of the biggest offenders of the slave labor lifestyle you speak of. -
It can be extremely difficult for people to accept that a system that worked for them, that benefits them, doesn’t work.Prestonluv said:
She got the job mainly for adult interaction.TheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/10/09/millennials-own-less-than-5percent-of-all-us-wealth.htmlPrestonluv said:TheKobeStopper said:Too bad you guys built an economy where both people in a couple have to work.
Given Tim’s previous comments, blaming feminism for why he can’t get laid, I wouldn’t take much of what he has to say here seriously.
No they dont in most cases. It's a matter of whether couples want to struggle financially in order to have a stay at home parent.
My kids had a stay at home mom their whole childhood. We struggled financially the first 4-5 years because of this but learned how to survive. Maybe we didn't go on vacation and maybe we didn't have nice cars or own a home....but guess what....nobody else raised our kids either. Nobody else changed their diaper during the day or got to see them walk and talk first. My wife saw everything and was there for them at all times during day and I was there at night time when I got home from work. People have their priorities fucked up. They value positions and social standing and nice cars over family.
I made around 40k a year the first 3 years on average and about 70k on average the next three years.
40k single income family is lower class in seattle and 70k is lower middle class in seattle. I eventually made more but we lived on scraps for the first 5-6 years and it was all worth it
My kids are 18 and 21 and super sweet and kind and respectful. I'm not saying that kids can't be that way from homes that have both parents working or from single parent homes....I'm saying it happens more often when you have a loving parent there at all times to care for them and guide them especially when they are young.
When my kids both hit elementary school then their mom found a part time job during day.
Easy peasy.
I have no problem saying that couples who both decide to work full time in the first 5-6 years of their kids life are doing them a disservice
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-birthrate-decline-millennials-delay-having-kids-2019-5?amp
https://agranato.medium.com/can-a-millennial-single-earner-support-a-traditional-middle-class-family-8a1e2fee20be
This last one is trying to create the best, cleanest, in a vacuum scenario for can millennial parents live a middle class life with kids on a single income and when they gets there, they says this.
Actually implementing this in real life would require very strong patience and discipline. This would mean virtually no eating at restaurants, international travel, or expensive purchases in general, including in years that are several years before actually having children in order to build up a substantial nest egg. It would require that they consistently be able to get raises that exceed inflation and not have any substantial period of unemployment. In other words, it would require substantial luck and willingness to pinch pennies for decades. But if you have a bachelor’s degree and run the table, the numbers do work.
No, for most of us it is not a choice between dual incomes and struggling a little bit. Even in your worthless, anecdotal life story, your wife still eventually got a part time job. It is a dual income economy if you want kids. That is what the numbers show.
By the time she got it I was making more money.
We lived in a 900 square foot home. We never went out. We didn't go on a vacation until they were 7 and 10. We never did anything expensive. We shopped at low income stores and got our clothes from garage sales in upper class neighborhoods.
We had one car and no financial help from anyone.
You can post all the links you want. I lived it in one of the richest cities on the face of this earth.
I’m reminded of this photo
This was used by the right to prove that poor people could work their way up, that black people could make it in America. A singular example to disprove statistical fact. The American dream is more real in Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Iceland, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria, Luxembourg, Germany, France, Slovenia, Canada, Japan, Australia, Malta, Ireland, Czechia, Singapore, UK, New Zealand, Estonia, Portugal, South Korea and Lithuania. And down here at 27th, in social mobility, is the United States of America. But that one lady made it so everything must be fine.
You worked hard, you sacrificed, you made it, no one is taking that away from you. Lots of people work hard, lots of people sacrifice, you’re not a special snowflake.
