Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

New Uniforms

145791018

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,807

    Uncle Tom is a term that's off limits for white trash like you. You only further prove your racism.
    Well, Thomas, I'm afraid you're going to have to meat me at 7-11 to enforce that directive.

    But not just any 7-11. I only rumble at the 7-11 on Aurora. The one near the U-District.

    PM me and I'll send you directions so you don't get lost.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    edited July 2019

    Your comment about wife lets me know that YOU KNOW who I am. You can have her. If she cheats I can leave with a clear conscious.

    I applaud you though for going after the whole fucking board. I did that a couple weeks ago and it didn’t end well. Shoutout to @Gladstone My bad.

    I work in news, I am the fucking news. You can’t be so naive to miss how blacks are bastardized in the news. The narrative is constantly spewed.

    Again, #wrongbored #takeittothetug

    Uhh...who are u again? Try and reconcile..you'll be lonely and a severe case of carpal tunnel awaits you. Pay your Cobra when u get canned. Its expensive
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921
    Seek help Pupster
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,807

    But he went to a GOOD public high school.
    Lolz. Exactly. The shittier the school and community you come from, the more the bleeding heart academics want you.

    What a rube.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Seek help Pupster

    Clever retort as always. Pack can you just once say something clever, funny, anything? I got in better arguments at Mark Twain elentary school. Serious, is this what 20-somethings are packing? When u eventually find an outcast for a wife, who finds a similar outcast in you...your wife and 1st lay is going to abuse you. I give your marriage 3 years. Hopefully you dont bring a kid into the world. He'll be ashamed of your sorry ass
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,163 Founders Club

    Clever retort as always. Pack can you just once say something clever, funny, anything? I got in better arguments at Mark Twain elentary school. Serious, is this what 20-somethings are packing? When u eventually find an outcast for a wife, who finds a similar outcast in you...your wife and 1st lay is going to abuse you. I give your marriage 3 years. Hopefully you dont bring a kid into the world. He'll be ashamed of your sorry ass
    Mark Twain Elementary, the glory years, when Pup peaked... dominating the playground and Frenching Tony Jones.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921
    edited July 2019

    Clever retort as always. Pack can you just once say something clever, funny, anything? I got in better arguments at Mark Twain elentary school. Serious, is this what 20-somethings are packing? When u eventually find an outcast for a wife, who finds a similar outcast in you...your wife and 1st lay is going to abuse you. I give your marriage 3 years. Hopefully you dont bring a kid into the world. He'll be ashamed of your sorry ass
    Seek help buddy
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921

    Mark Twain Elementary, the glory years, when Pup peaked... dominating the playground and Frenching Tony Jones.
    Lol figures he’s a twain fag
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921
    How shitty was your SAT?

    I know plenty of in-state kids who weren’t legacies that got in with a 3.5.
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,782 Swaye's Wigwam
    Bread said:

    Did the uniforms leak today, wheres the pics?? 90 new posts! Nope just ballz.

    You left out the the faggotry

    Uhh...who are u again? Try and reconcile..you'll be lonely and a severe case of carpal tunnel awaits you. Pay your Cobra when u get canned. Its expensive
    In such cases, what might these self-appointed, habitual advice-givers be revealing about themselves? Actually, much more than you may have realized.

    What the chronic advice-giver’s suggestions—often gratuitous and unsolicited—typically betray is a powerful need to prove to themselves that they could deal with your difficulties better than you could ever be expected to. And also that the depth and breadth of their intelligence, knowledge and comprehension indicates a still more general superiority over you. Assuming that this strong impulse to give you unsought advice is something you’ve also seem them demonstrate with others, such behavior hints at a person whose ego demands perpetual reassurance: That it needs to be regularly reminded that it’s exceptional—somehow of a higher “rank” or “order” than the one who’s receiving the advice.

    Consider that if, deep down, inveterate advice-givers view their worth on the basis of how well they compare to others, they must remain (however unconsciously) in eternal competition with you. One way they can claim interpersonal victory—or gain the relational “upper hand”— is through, authoritatively, providing you with advice. Such individuals, firmly entrenched in the ego-gratifying habit of telling others what they should do, rarely can wait to be asked for their opinion. Routinely anxious to declare that they know something you don’t, they’re apt to offer suggestions or solutions prematurely. Not that their remedies aren’t generally well-intentioned. But there’s still a certain element of righteous self-satisfaction in how these opinions are volunteered. Which is why you might harbor vague, uneasy suspicions that what they’re proposing may somehow be meant as much for themselves as for you.

    If you don’t particularly like their advice (and haven’t requested it anyway), you may still need to respond to them with considerable care. For since, below the surface, they’re much less self-confident than you might imagine, they could easily become upset or offended if they feel you haven’t taken them seriously (as perhaps their parents didn’t when they were growing up). So you may be left in the undesirable position of having, graciously, to thank them for their unwanted suggestions, even as you regretfully decline them. And—ironically—they may actually care much less about whether you accept their advice than that you value or validate it. Once again, you need to remember that their sometimes annoying habit of “taking control” of your decision-making process relates more to their underlying insecurity and self-doubt than it does to any simple arrogance, audacity, or conceit.

    Their rather tenuous self-esteem and -respect—as well as their belief that they really matter and are important to others—may well hinge on your willingness to take pains to confirm the legitimacy of what they’re saying. So, hopefully, you can do this, despite the fact that their advice may not be suitable to your present situation, or even reflect your values. Consequently, unless you place little worth on the relationship, it makes sense to be sympathetic and accommodating toward their dependency-based need for (ego-boosting) reassurance.

    Otherwise, you may find yourself going back and forth with them indefinitely—debating the pro's and con's of what they’re needing to convince you of. For if, unbeknownst to you, their positive self-regard is at stake, you can hardly expect them to forgo their viewpoint readily. Which is, again, why it’s crucial to keep in mind that most often they don’t require that you agree with them—just that you let them know that, despite its not quite fitting your circumstances, what they’re saying makes good sense to you.

    Finally, I’d like to introduce a “corollary” to the points I’ve been making. There are some ethical considerations here, so please note that what I’m describing isn’t anything I’d particularly recommend: Namely, that it might be fairly easy to exploit the advice-giver’s hidden agenda to “dominate” you, or assume superiority over you. That is, if you specifically ask them for advice, help, or guidance on something, they may be happy to actually “take on” the background research necessary for you to make the most informed decision. Or if you ask them to recommend how best to complete a task, they might even offer to do it for you. For that would enable them to demonstrate—both to you and themselves—their admiral ability to handle the job. (And, unquestionably, they do feed on praise!)

    In these instances, the advice-giver is granted a position of higher authority and, in this privileged role of “consultant,” experiences substantial ego gratification. As I mentioned earlier, the driving, largely unconscious impetus behind the advice-giver’s at times problematic habit is for them to assuage deep, never-resolved feelings of gnawing self-doubt. So in any given situation, the challenge is to find healthy ways of reassuring them of their essential competence . . . but without actually taking advantage of them—or feeling that they’re somehow taking advantage of you.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921

    You left out the the faggotry In such cases, what might these self-appointed, habitual advice-givers be revealing about themselves? Actually, much more than you may have realized.

    What the chronic advice-giver’s suggestions—often gratuitous and unsolicited—typically betray is a powerful need to prove to themselves that they could deal with your difficulties better than you could ever be expected to. And also that the depth and breadth of their intelligence, knowledge and comprehension indicates a still more general superiority over you. Assuming that this strong impulse to give you unsought advice is something you’ve also seem them demonstrate with others, such behavior hints at a person whose ego demands perpetual reassurance: That it needs to be regularly reminded that it’s exceptional—somehow of a higher “rank” or “order” than the one who’s receiving the advice.

    Consider that if, deep down, inveterate advice-givers view their worth on the basis of how well they compare to others, they must remain (however unconsciously) in eternal competition with you. One way they can claim interpersonal victory—or gain the relational “upper hand”— is through, authoritatively, providing you with advice. Such individuals, firmly entrenched in the ego-gratifying habit of telling others what they should do, rarely can wait to be asked for their opinion. Routinely anxious to declare that they know something you don’t, they’re apt to offer suggestions or solutions prematurely. Not that their remedies aren’t generally well-intentioned. But there’s still a certain element of righteous self-satisfaction in how these opinions are volunteered. Which is why you might harbor vague, uneasy suspicions that what they’re proposing may somehow be meant as much for themselves as for you.

    If you don’t particularly like their advice (and haven’t requested it anyway), you may still need to respond to them with considerable care. For since, below the surface, they’re much less self-confident than you might imagine, they could easily become upset or offended if they feel you haven’t taken them seriously (as perhaps their parents didn’t when they were growing up). So you may be left in the undesirable position of having, graciously, to thank them for their unwanted suggestions, even as you regretfully decline them. And—ironically—they may actually care much less about whether you accept their advice than that you value or validate it. Once again, you need to remember that their sometimes annoying habit of “taking control” of your decision-making process relates more to their underlying insecurity and self-doubt than it does to any simple arrogance, audacity, or conceit.

    Their rather tenuous self-esteem and -respect—as well as their belief that they really matter and are important to others—may well hinge on your willingness to take pains to confirm the legitimacy of what they’re saying. So, hopefully, you can do this, despite the fact that their advice may not be suitable to your present situation, or even reflect your values. Consequently, unless you place little worth on the relationship, it makes sense to be sympathetic and accommodating toward their dependency-based need for (ego-boosting) reassurance.

    Otherwise, you may find yourself going back and forth with them indefinitely—debating the pro's and con's of what they’re needing to convince you of. For if, unbeknownst to you, their positive self-regard is at stake, you can hardly expect them to forgo their viewpoint readily. Which is, again, why it’s crucial to keep in mind that most often they don’t require that you agree with them—just that you let them know that, despite its not quite fitting your circumstances, what they’re saying makes good sense to you.

    Finally, I’d like to introduce a “corollary” to the points I’ve been making. There are some ethical considerations here, so please note that what I’m describing isn’t anything I’d particularly recommend: Namely, that it might be fairly easy to exploit the advice-giver’s hidden agenda to “dominate” you, or assume superiority over you. That is, if you specifically ask them for advice, help, or guidance on something, they may be happy to actually “take on” the background research necessary for you to make the most informed decision. Or if you ask them to recommend how best to complete a task, they might even offer to do it for you. For that would enable them to demonstrate—both to you and themselves—their admiral ability to handle the job. (And, unquestionably, they do feed on praise!)

    In these instances, the advice-giver is granted a position of higher authority and, in this privileged role of “consultant,” experiences substantial ego gratification. As I mentioned earlier, the driving, largely unconscious impetus behind the advice-giver’s at times problematic habit is for them to assuage deep, never-resolved feelings of gnawing self-doubt. So in any given situation, the challenge is to find healthy ways of reassuring them of their essential competence . . . but without actually taking advantage of them—or feeling that they’re somehow taking advantage of you.
    Quit plagiarizing someone’s shit, fucko
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735

    A 3.5 in high school? Good god man, you can sleep through high school and get a 3.5. You didn’t “aspire to be a good student”. .... Things people who aren’t capable of being good students say. Like poor people who say shit like money can buy you happiness. GTF outta here with that stupid bullshit.

    I heard of an instate valedictorian not getting in in 2011. Can you link others. One case would not make a trend and I’d learn toward he was a douche.
    Anybody can be a good student. It's not a measure of intelligence. It's a measure of obedience, effort, and discipline. That's it. Good grades don't mean you're smart and bad grades don't mean you're dumb. There are plenty of millionaires and billionaires who dropped out of school. You likely learned at a young age that you don't have talent or good looks so your only hope in life was to try really hard in school. It doesn't make you better than anybody else. Ugly little micro penis having nerds and incels who got straight A's in school are not better than anybody. They're compensating for the traits that they don't possess. You sound like one of those guys.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,823

    This is an all timer as far as Ballz AIDS threads go. From dying on the hill of pant stripes, all the way to whining about how unfair UW is these days and how all of the Asians cleaned his clock in admissions. Sprinkle in some confusion about the roots of creep and a flagrantly racist cameo from pumpy, and we've got an archive-ready classic on our hands.

    Still no word on those new uniforms though.

Sign In or Register to comment.