Woody nominated for national athletic director of the year
Comments
-
-
I've said it before. Woodward fell ass-backwards into the one good decision he's made as AD: Hiring Petersen. Simple fact.
I'm extremely bullish on Husky Football these days. I can't fucking wait for the season to start. But Woodward ain't got nuthin' to do with it. -
A ton of revisionist history going on in here. It's getting to be like revenge of the nerds around here.TTJ said:I've said it before. Woodward fell ass-backwards into the one good decision he's made as AD: Hiring Petersen. Simple fact.
I'm extremely bullish on Husky Football these days. I can't fucking wait for the season to start. But Woodward ain't got nuthin' to do with it.
Woodward deserves credit for Petersen but giving him credit for Sark choosing to LEAVE! is a little asinine IMO. -
Agreed.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A ton of revisionist history going on in here. It's getting to be like revenge of the nerds around here.TTJ said:I've said it before. Woodward fell ass-backwards into the one good decision he's made as AD: Hiring Petersen. Simple fact.
I'm extremely bullish on Husky Football these days. I can't fucking wait for the season to start. But Woodward ain't got nuthin' to do with it.
Woodward deserves credit for Petersen but giving him credit for Sark choosing to LEAVE! is a little asinine IMO.
OTOH, he deserves REAL credit for the stadium, IMO. Long before the HHB DIAFF, everyone there was convinced the Dawgs were destined to end up at the CLink for good. Woodward pulling that off (along with the long overdue beisbol park) are major poonts in his favor to me.
I'm not ready to give him ADOTY, but he's trending pretty heavily in the right direction as far as I'm concerned. I'll go so far as to say I hope we keep him, and I never thought I'd be saying that. -
Agreed with all of that. I think Woodward is going in the right direction. I'm aware Sark leaving so shortly and Petersen coming here so shortly didn't occur over night either.dnc said:
Agreed.He_Needs_More_Time said:
A ton of revisionist history going on in here. It's getting to be like revenge of the nerds around here.TTJ said:I've said it before. Woodward fell ass-backwards into the one good decision he's made as AD: Hiring Petersen. Simple fact.
I'm extremely bullish on Husky Football these days. I can't fucking wait for the season to start. But Woodward ain't got nuthin' to do with it.
Woodward deserves credit for Petersen but giving him credit for Sark choosing to LEAVE! is a little asinine IMO.
OTOH, he deserves REAL credit for the stadium, IMO. Long before the HHB DIAFF, everyone there was convinced the Dawgs were destined to end up at the CLink for good. Woodward pulling that off (along with the long overdue beisbol park) are major poonts in his favor to me.
I'm not ready to give him ADOTY, but he's trending pretty heavily in the right direction as far as I'm concerned. I'll go so far as to say I hope we keep him, and I never thought I'd be saying that.
However, I think many are too quick to crown his ass. If not for Pat HadenFS we still have Sark as our head coach for two more years of lame dick football. -
He got the stadium and Petersen.
Whether by luck or ingenuity ... He got it done. -
This is all that really matters. Some fucks on here really will be miserable and negative no matter whatfivehundredmileDAWG said:He got the stadium and Petersen.
Whether by luck or ingenuity ... He got it done. -
-
I'd hit it.AZDuck said:
-
Is it established (or even assumed) that the stadium project would never have happened but for Woodward's influence? I honestly don't know the answer.dnc said:OTOH, he deserves REAL credit for the stadium, IMO. Long before the HHB DIAFF, everyone there was convinced the Dawgs were destined to end up at the CLink for good. Woodward pulling that off (along with the long overdue beisbol park) are major poonts in his favor to me.





