Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'

1…6791112…20

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    What planet do you live on? The Old Gray Lady gave up on being the official record years ago. Only you are surprised they no longer publish retractions. Keep up.

    Interesting. A NYT retraction is among the reasons why Palin's lawsuit is going to be dismissed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    I'm not excited by Durham's filing. You are. You just keep going on and on about this shit, and like I said, you sound retarded.
    No. You're simply a disinterested observer.

    Obviously.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,470 Founders Club
    Sound?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    I'm not excited by Durham's filing. You are. You just keep going on and on about this shit, and like I said, you sound retarded.
    No. You're simply a disinterested observer.

    Obviously.
    A lot of people observe your obsession with daddy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter