He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
and?hardhat said:
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket -
Delete your account.HHusky said:
and?hardhat said:
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up. -
Shut the fuck upHHusky said:
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up.
The only concession is that you're a worthless lying sack of shit
Everyone says so -
Embarrassing. Even for Dazzler. -
Translation: I'm a lying sack of shit who lacks all integrity, I'll never apologize, but you girls already knew that.HHusky said:Durham?
You girls will all have moved on by the time he’s as widely admired as Giuliani is now. -
Embarrassing level of Clinton bootlicking.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies.
As you know, if that was not the case, Hillary would have had him murdered by now. -
Dazzler has never been right about anything. This is no different.




