Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
You need evidence that the Alfa Bank story was complete bullshit Dazzler?HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L. -
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Just let hh go. He knows he has nothing and has been wrong on all his conspiracies about Trump. He's like listening to a little kid who refuses to admit he was wrong. Now that the shoe is on the other foot and the special prosecutor is actually making claims, he trots out the lefts weak assed claims of "what proof" as if Durham has laid it all out there for the final time.
"statute of limitations" LOL! What the fuck does that have to do with anything. They cheated or they didn't and in this case Durham is saying they did. If you want to tell everyone to get off your lawn because the statute of limitations has passed, that is not going to keep Durham from providing the fact that The Bitch and your other elitist pig leaders who you are so willing to lie for, actually cheated.
Grow up. -
Barr stopped him from prosecuting Trump!!!WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Trump was impeached, Lady. ~DazzlerWestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Birds aren't real. ~DazzlerSFGbob said:
Barr stopped him from prosecuting Trump!!!WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
W in your life has never stood for win...hthHHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L. -
I could see this as somewhat accurate which would only support what the sane here have known for some time; the swamp will never run out of bog water.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies.
As you know, if that was not the case, Hillary would have had him murdered by now. -
My people learned to never concede at Wounded Knee.HHusky said:
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up. -
A good lawyer makes a small accusation first, gets a detailed denial of that accusation and then hits you with the big one wherePurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
Unclear if he is good or not, but he would be slow rolling this if he was good.
