Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'
Comments
-
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
and?hardhat said:
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket -
Delete your account.HHusky said:
and?hardhat said:
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up. -
Shut the fuck upHHusky said:
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up.
The only concession is that you're a worthless lying sack of shit
Everyone says so -
Embarrassing. Even for Dazzler. -
Translation: I'm a lying sack of shit who lacks all integrity, I'll never apologize, but you girls already knew that.HHusky said:Durham?
You girls will all have moved on by the time he’s as widely admired as Giuliani is now. -
Embarrassing level of Clinton bootlicking.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies.
As you know, if that was not the case, Hillary would have had him murdered by now. -
Dazzler has never been right about anything. This is no different.
-
You need evidence that the Alfa Bank story was complete bullshit Dazzler?HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L. -
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Just let hh go. He knows he has nothing and has been wrong on all his conspiracies about Trump. He's like listening to a little kid who refuses to admit he was wrong. Now that the shoe is on the other foot and the special prosecutor is actually making claims, he trots out the lefts weak assed claims of "what proof" as if Durham has laid it all out there for the final time.
"statute of limitations" LOL! What the fuck does that have to do with anything. They cheated or they didn't and in this case Durham is saying they did. If you want to tell everyone to get off your lawn because the statute of limitations has passed, that is not going to keep Durham from providing the fact that The Bitch and your other elitist pig leaders who you are so willing to lie for, actually cheated.
Grow up. -
Barr stopped him from prosecuting Trump!!!WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Trump was impeached, Lady. ~DazzlerWestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
Birds aren't real. ~DazzlerSFGbob said:
Barr stopped him from prosecuting Trump!!!WestlinnDuck said:
The dazzler still says that Mueller found lots of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians is just that Mueller didn't put in his report for reasons ...Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies. -
W in your life has never stood for win...hthHHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L. -
I could see this as somewhat accurate which would only support what the sane here have known for some time; the swamp will never run out of bog water.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies.
As you know, if that was not the case, Hillary would have had him murdered by now. -
My people learned to never concede at Wounded Knee.HHusky said:
Swaye already conceded.RaceBannon said:Faced with even more evidence of how full of shit he has been the dazzler triples down on calling people gals
That's the ticket
Please keep up. -
A good lawyer makes a small accusation first, gets a detailed denial of that accusation and then hits you with the big one wherePurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
Unclear if he is good or not, but he would be slow rolling this if he was good. -
-
You can tell that H is dominating this thread by how many times he calls you guys gals and ladies.
It's a bloodbath.
-
You'll notice he ran away like a little bitch from that question. His BIG gotcha in this thread was that someone said there was "evidence" while Durham has yet to present any evidence at this point. The case has yet to be adjudicated. Of course the Dazzler needed no evidence to proclaim that Trump was a Russian stooge and that he had colluded with them to win the election. When Race and I used to ask the Dazzler for the "evidence" he had to back up those claims, Dazzler questioned our patriotism and claim we were traitors to the country.MikeDamone said:
-
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again? -
Durham will go after a few fringe guys and protect the state. He gave more proof its all rigged but we already knew it was…crimes are inconsequential in a Banana Republic when it’s the state doing them.PurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
-
He’s not high…his IQ is really low…hardhat said:
Wow, you are high.HHusky said:
He'll never have to prove any of it because it's never going to be an element of any charge he ever brings. The "conflict of interest" concern is weak as fuck. It was contrived in order to allow him to kiss the hem of Daddy's robe and placate the rubes . . . for now. He'll ride off into the sunset claiming the conspiracy was there, but the statute of limitations just ran out on him.Swaye said:
The allegation is "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump." I find it very hard to believe that Durham would allege this and not have the actual DNS logs to support his assertion, which would be the evidence. I didn't even go to law school and look at me go. This stuff isn't hard or confusing. Lawyers just try to obfuscate simple things. Everyone here knows the evidence he collected should underpin his allegations, but thanks for trying to be of service. You failed, of course.HHusky said:
Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problemsPurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.
Have a great day, ladies.
-
Disappointingly, agree. We? all want her head on a pike - and we know she deserves it - but it will never happen.HoustonHusky said:
Durham will go after a few fringe guys and protect the state. He gave more proof its all rigged but we already knew it was…crimes are inconsequential in a Banana Republic when it’s the state doing them.PurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
-
Dazzler backtracking like a bitch now?pawz said:
Disappointingly, agree. We? all want her head on a pike - and we know she deserves it - but it will never happen.HoustonHusky said:
Durham will go after a few fringe guys and protect the state. He gave more proof its all rigged but we already knew it was…crimes are inconsequential in a Banana Republic when it’s the state doing them.PurpleThrobber said:
Durham is going to slow roll this.Bendintheriver said:Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.
So all of a sudden he's a big deep state guy?
Fuck him.
-
There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.htmlSFGbob said:
Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.HHusky said:Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?
Just take the L.
Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
