Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'

13567

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    So it's fake but accurate. Got it. The FBI concluded there was zero evidence to support the accusation that there was a secret internet communication channel between Trump and Alfa Bank. It was all a fucking lie based upon no evidence. You swallowed like a bitch Dazzler and you didn't care that there was no evidence. Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.
    I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,009 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    OH for fuck sake, grow up Jr. You are beyond embarrassing. For crying out loud.

    The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!

    Run and hide hh. You are so ridiculous.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.
    I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?
    You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    OH for fuck sake, grow up Jr. You are beyond embarrassing. For crying out loud.

    The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!

    Run and hide hh. You are so ridiculous.
    Why is Durham trying to tell you the data guys now disbelieve their original hypothesis? It's not true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,678 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    OH for fuck sake, grow up Jr. You are beyond embarrassing. For crying out loud.

    The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!!!!!!!!!!!

    Run and hide hh. You are so ridiculous.
    Why is Durham trying to tell you the data guys now disbelieve their original hypothesis? It's not true.
    So was Jake Sullivan lying under oath in 2017 or just a fucking idiot (who now is the head of national security)? Should be a good answer either way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    Stooge propagandist for the NY Slimes fits you so well. You have a very weak mind Dazzler. The kind guys like Hitler and Stalin loved.
    I love how the Dazzler thinks there are all these "crimes" that Trump committed but that the Rats were just too modest and unwilling to charge him with. At every turn the Rats have been shown to be shameless liars. The Dossier, Russian collusion, Alfa Bank, if Hillary was doing the Lord's work and everything they were doing was just in order to expose Trump's crimes why hide the fact that the DNC and Hillary paid for the Dossier? Why not scream that from the rooftops? Why all the lies to the FISA court? Why hide the fact that you were spying on the Trump campaign?
    You missed the destruction and removal of Presidential records? I can remember when people got prosecuted for that.
    Stooge for Maggie! Fits you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited February 2022
    We know Hillary used bleachbit and hammers to destroy subpoenaed info and devices. Dazzler doesn’t care because someone told Trump Hater Maggie H. that the toilet overflowed! And they saw paper, with words!

    This is what a F’n Stooge looks like folks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Durham needs to finalize and then people need to go to jail. This is why many in the country have zero confidence in our elections and why more and more people are realizing that the rats cheat.

    Durham is going to slow roll this.



    Funny actually, given Durham's statute of limitations problems

    This tedious and not particularly thoughtful pleading about supposed "conflicts of interest" is an excuse to gin you girls up with allegations. That's allegations in contrast to evidence, Swaye.

    Have a great day, ladies.
    I don't seem to remember you having this standard for evidence when it came to allegations against Trump.

    It's almost as though you have two separate sets of standards for some reason.
    I can't call them 'mental gymnastics' because that gives @HHusky too much credit.

    I'll just say, I can't want to see the gymnastics on this one.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    On Reddit they are still posting articles daily on how trump "maybe" will go to jail.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    Pitchfork51 said:

    On Reddit they are still posting articles daily on how trump "maybe" will go to jail.

    OKA h porn
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    RoadTrip said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    On Reddit they are still posting articles daily on how trump "maybe" will go to jail.

    OKA h porn
    WTF?

    My guess is you need to elaborate in the WAM.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    On Reddit they are still posting articles daily on how trump "maybe" will go to jail.

    OKA h porn
    WTF?

    My guess is you need to elaborate in the WAM.
    No need. Articles suggesting Trump will be arrested are piled in the Dazzler's bathroom
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    It's treason. Hillary for a life sentence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited February 2022
    RoadTrip said:

    pawz said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Pitchfork51 said:

    On Reddit they are still posting articles daily on how trump "maybe" will go to jail.

    OKA h porn
    WTF?

    My guess is you need to elaborate in the WAM.
    No need. Articles suggesting Trump will be arrested are piled in the Dazzler's bathroom
    Right next to the Jergens lotion?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Lotta responses. What evidence, ladies?

    Just take the L.

    Lotta of Dazzler running and hiding like a Kunt from the very simple question he was asked.

    Dazzler where was the "evidence" in support of the statement released by the Hillary campaign in October 2016 that Race posted earlier? Since you're so BIG on evidence what was the evidence for that claim? Was that claim true Dazzler? Were you a fucking gullible dipshit yet again?
    There was and still remains evidence in support of Hillary's statement. The notion that anyone has disproven it is your fantasy. The data scientists involved haven't determined that their theory was incorrect. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

    Durham is lying by omission, at least. His job is to negate the impact of very real crimes committed by Daddy and/or those surrounding him. And why did Daddy keep lying about his interests and involvement in Russia?
    What planet do you live on? The Old Gray Lady gave up on being the official record years ago. Only you are surprised they no longer publish retractions. Keep up.

    Interesting. A NYT retraction is among the reasons why Palin's lawsuit is going to be dismissed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    I'm not excited by Durham's filing. You are. You just keep going on and on about this shit, and like I said, you sound retarded.
    No. You're simply a disinterested observer.

    Obviously.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Sound?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    I'm not excited by Durham's filing. You are. You just keep going on and on about this shit, and like I said, you sound retarded.
    No. You're simply a disinterested observer.

    Obviously.
    A lot of people observe your obsession with daddy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter