UW practices according to a buddy
Comments
-
"Quit living in the past. You keep thinking this is 1991 and it just isn't. College Football has changed and you just gotta accept we won't ever get there"- DoogTequilla said:The UW program was strong before Don James ... it was strong after Don James ... the program is the program before and after Chris Petersen.
Great coaching + UW resources = Championships.
The program is what makes it all possible.
"That's total bullshit. It's all about coaching. Bama, USC, Ohio State, Florida, Oklahoma have all been great with a great coach and all been shit with bad coaching. Washington is no different. Get a good coach here and we'll win"- Me when talking to Doogs.
That last point is why I think deep down inside Doogs are scared UW will win immediately under Petersen. It will prove us all right as I'm sure you've had those conversations as well.
It's so annoying and when Petersen wins I won't let Doogs forget it. I'll remind them that they said we couldn't get a better coach than Sark, that times haven't changed that much that it's still all about the coach, that a great coach doesn't need fucking five years and how they all wanted to extend Sark the minute after the apple cup so all this success would have never happened had they been running the fucking program. I'll also remind those fucks that we were all celebrating when Sark left while they were in full panic mode.
As always the HHB's were right and the dumb fuck Doogs were wrong. Of course as time goes on more and more people will have "never" supported Sark just like nobody now claims to have supported Ty. Lather, Rinse, Repeat. -
Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
I would love it if this happens. USC should get better after the first year, but it's going to create strain on the program. I think they would have a tough time winning 10 this year with a good coach. With Sark, they win 8 max. I'm predicting 7-6.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
You don't think USC will win the South at least once in the next 3-4 years? They average a conference title every 2.5 years.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
I don't think Mora is staying at UCLA that long. Over/under is 2 years. He's trying to win a title with Myles Jack, Hundley, and Vanderdoes. When a good NFL job becomes available, he's out. The Seahawks job and getting fired after one year eats at a competitor like him.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
I'm skeptical. I could see it happening, but I also have a hard time believing Sark will coach them to the road wins needed to get a title. Maybe he gets lucky one season after losing 2 or even 3 conference games and sneaks in.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
You don't think USC will win the South at least once in the next 3-4 years? They average a conference title every 2.5 years.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
-
He's a bad coach and the south has became stronger. Plus after this year no more skipping Oregon or UW.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
You don't think USC will win the South at least once in the next 3-4 years? They average a conference title every 2.5 years.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
You are what your record says you are. He went 34-29 at UW and 24-21 in conference play. I don't see him winning the south at all.
-
Who in the south after UCLA has the talent that USC has? We all know Sark won't do much to develop it but there's less developing for him to do. I can see a 9-3 or 10-2 regular season within the next 3 years that wins the south for USC.
Sark can then have that added under the championships tab on his website. -
They did.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
You don't think USC will win the South at least once in the next 3-4 years? They average a conference title every 2.5 years.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I don't see it. Sark isn't beating Mora and he'll drop some road games to teams less talented.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Re: Petersen and Sark, there is a reasonable chance these two will meet in a pac-12 title game at somepoint and Sark's job could be on the line. Think 2016.
Not any more.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
