Jake Haener
Comments
-
God damn I want this kid back on Mountlake
-
You dorks only want him so you can be Eskimo brothers with swaye
-
That’s funny, but I really just hate Huards
-
-
HAENER SZN -
-
So what we do have on the roster is a raw freshman qb that was awful in his first start and a sophomore qb who was awful all year.
Why don't we want a senior qb who had quite a bit of success last year on our roster as well? -
I’m not saying that Sam will be good or not … but anybody says that they know because of 1 game in a lost season when he was put in a position to fail is full of shitKaepsknee said:
Can’t wait for the pivot about this time next year.Tequilla said:
Players get betterRoadDawg55 said:
I actually do think he’s a better college QB than Eason. Again, Huard threw 4 picks and couldn’t beat out Dylan fucking Morris.sonics1993 said:
Jake Haener couldn't beat out Jake Browning and Jacob Eason.CuntWaffle said:
As far as a culture change goes I want players to think they have to come in and compete, not just given the red carpet treatment coming out of high school because of their recruiting ranking. It’s 2021 and I get that the QB position is different especially with the portal and if Sam had played this year and looked pretty good I could see your argument a bit better. But he wasn’t able to beat out Morris who likes to regularly throw into triple coverage and looked TERRIBLE in his first start. Yes the team gave up and played a part but he didn’t do anything well that game, at all. He shouldn’t automatically be handed the starting job if competition is brought in.sonics1993 said:
I'm not saying that at all, but I'm being realistic about where Washington stands in terms of talent. I don't think we are talented as we seem and that this needs to be torn down and rebuilt back up with a culture change which takes time.CuntWaffle said:
Pac 12 was .500 vs Mountain West this year. 16-24 since 2016 and 13-12 against them in bowl games. Let’s not pretend like the Pac 12 is a juggernaut conference in comparison.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused.
And again it’s one season IF it happens and if Huard isn’t willing to sit and learn for one more season behind a QB who has had success in this current offense then that says a lot about him and his mentality.
Sam has gotten a raw deal development wise with a COVID year plus the malpractice of a staff he played for this year
The book hasn’t even started to be written about his future as a college football player
What I saw from Sam in the Spring suggested he was not close to being ready. He did some good things vs the Cougs but he clearly hadn’t had a massive leap in development
So we’ll see -
Sam being a slam dunk success is far from 100%RoadDawg55 said:
This is all true, but the signs aren’t good. We’ll know once he gets some better coaching. Most, not all but most, really good players, play well no matter what.Tequilla said:
Players get betterRoadDawg55 said:
I actually do think he’s a better college QB than Eason. Again, Huard threw 4 picks and couldn’t beat out Dylan fucking Morris.sonics1993 said:
Jake Haener couldn't beat out Jake Browning and Jacob Eason.CuntWaffle said:
As far as a culture change goes I want players to think they have to come in and compete, not just given the red carpet treatment coming out of high school because of their recruiting ranking. It’s 2021 and I get that the QB position is different especially with the portal and if Sam had played this year and looked pretty good I could see your argument a bit better. But he wasn’t able to beat out Morris who likes to regularly throw into triple coverage and looked TERRIBLE in his first start. Yes the team gave up and played a part but he didn’t do anything well that game, at all. He shouldn’t automatically be handed the starting job if competition is brought in.sonics1993 said:
I'm not saying that at all, but I'm being realistic about where Washington stands in terms of talent. I don't think we are talented as we seem and that this needs to be torn down and rebuilt back up with a culture change which takes time.CuntWaffle said:
Pac 12 was .500 vs Mountain West this year. 16-24 since 2016 and 13-12 against them in bowl games. Let’s not pretend like the Pac 12 is a juggernaut conference in comparison.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused.
And again it’s one season IF it happens and if Huard isn’t willing to sit and learn for one more season behind a QB who has had success in this current offense then that says a lot about him and his mentality.
Sam has gotten a raw deal development wise with a COVID year plus the malpractice of a staff he played for this year
The book hasn’t even started to be written about his future as a college football player
It was a broken offense. I’m not unequivocally saying he’s gonna be a busy, but most QB’s are, and the early returns are really bad.
2 years of effectively stunted development doesn’t get fixed overnight -
I trust DeBoner with Huard more than any of the dipshits coaching QB since Sark (I don’t like Sark but he could coach up QB)
-
-
I guarantee you this move has been discussed with both Sam Huard and Damon Huard before its made. Everybody Relax.
-
If Huard is butt hurt over this and wants to play at Sam Houston State, then good riddance.
If he’s like his dad and uncle and really wants to be at UW, then it sounds like he’s in good hands with DeBoner. If the Dutchman cant make him a winner, he probably was a loser to begin with. -
I thought we loved quittersTheHB said:If Huard is butt hurt over this and wants to play at Sam Houston State, then good riddance.
If he’s like his dad and uncle and really wants to be at UW, then it sounds like he’s in good hands with DeBoner. If the Dutchman cant make him a winner, he probably was a loser to begin with. -
Petersen chose skinny. Wasn't forced by Dennis or anyone else. Right or wrong.RoadDawg55 said:
You used to tout coaches choosing the wrong QB all the time. You love to argue but you have no consistency and are arguing simply to argue.RaceBannon said:
If he beat him he'd win the jobDerekJohnson said:
He did compete. I'll bet anything that he outperformed Eason in fall camp. And Pete still gave the job to Eason in the 11th hour. I don't blame Haener at all for leaving. And by the way, he competed his ass off this season to the tune of 3,810 yards and 32 TDs / 9 ints.RaceBannon said:
Haener left rather than compete. Fuck himRoadDawg55 said:
Sam sucks. Sorry, but if he was any good at all he would have beat out Morris. If he leaves we get a QB that is actually good.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
I hate Petersen but not as much as many of you
I'm surprised
Haener is better than we have. He knows the offense. Whoever said they would rather have Rattler, I agree, but it’s close. Haener coming back would not be a bad thing.
There's a dozen qbs at least that will transfer
The Haener love is bizarre but we're a mountain west school now and the fans love it
-
When the fuck did azduck get back? I must have been drunk
-
-
Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish. -
life isnt fair hthFSDogs1 said:Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish.
-
he paid a king's ransom and had to take it up the butPitchfork51 said:When the fuck did azduck get back? I must have been drunk
-
If I'm DeBoer I don't want him falling for another coach and I do want to start firming up my roster.FSDogs1 said:Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish. -
-
I am with you that skinny was better at the time. Skinny was good until teams moved him off his spot and then he was worthless. Haener was and still is turnover prone. But he improved a lot. If he wants to come so be it. I hope the best player plays. Just because all the other qb’s go into the portal doesn’t mean they would entertain coming to uw. I would rather have rattler but get it while the gettin is good.RaceBannon said:
Petersen chose skinny. Wasn't forced by Dennis or anyone else. Right or wrong.RoadDawg55 said:
You used to tout coaches choosing the wrong QB all the time. You love to argue but you have no consistency and are arguing simply to argue.RaceBannon said:
If he beat him he'd win the jobDerekJohnson said:
He did compete. I'll bet anything that he outperformed Eason in fall camp. And Pete still gave the job to Eason in the 11th hour. I don't blame Haener at all for leaving. And by the way, he competed his ass off this season to the tune of 3,810 yards and 32 TDs / 9 ints.RaceBannon said:
Haener left rather than compete. Fuck himRoadDawg55 said:
Sam sucks. Sorry, but if he was any good at all he would have beat out Morris. If he leaves we get a QB that is actually good.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
I hate Petersen but not as much as many of you
I'm surprised
Haener is better than we have. He knows the offense. Whoever said they would rather have Rattler, I agree, but it’s close. Haener coming back would not be a bad thing.
There's a dozen qbs at least that will transfer
The Haener love is bizarre but we're a mountain west school now and the fans love it
-
That is pretty messed up.FSDogs1 said:Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish. -
We haven’t had a QB in my time as a UW fan that could do all of this. -
If you don’t want a proven good college QB you’re an idiot.
-
Lowkey one of the funniest things The Onion ever produced.AZDuck said: -
It is. But whatever. Just win. It’s the Washington way. The program is at its best when we’re dirty.LawDawg1 said:
That is pretty messed up.FSDogs1 said:Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish. -
Jake Browning is ourº best QB since Tui, and he'll probably retain that dubious distinction for a while yet. That's how bad Warshington QB recruitment and development has been. For the program, no downside bringing in Haen V3 in for a shot at it, again.
-
I have no issue with what DeBoer is doing.Mad_Son said:
If I'm DeBoer I don't want him falling for another coach and I do want to start firming up my roster.FSDogs1 said:Well you've decapitated our program.
I have no problem with DeBoer poaching Haener. But Haener entering the transfer portal BEFORE our bowl game strikes me as incredibly selfish.