Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jake Haener
Comments
-
We'll pull as much talent out of the portal as we lose into it.sonics1993 said:
The team went 4-8, will have back-to-back mediocre recruiting classes, and a decent amount of talent leave the program; it's a rebuild.Kingdome_Urinals said:UW was only a functioning scheme and QB away from 1 or 2 losses last year. It's not a rebuild.
-
It was his first year, he had no QB coach and played under an interim OC with a dog shit OL and no running game. I can't see how we are giving up on him after one year.CuntWaffle said:
Then fuck him. If he thinks he earned the starting QB role by coming in and throwing 4 interceptions in his first start against WSU and wants to bail because he doesn’t want to compete then let him go.sonics1993 said:
Because I know Sam wants to play now and I don't expect him to stay if he doesn't get the job next year. If I knew Sam would 100% stay, then I'm fine with it, but that doesn't go along with what I have heard from his camp.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why not both? Your take is getting stranger and stranger.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused.
This is the part of recruiting that drives me bat shit crazy. You can see the results but let’s ignore them because stars. -
Isn't Haener a senior?
-
Because of COVID, he gets one more year.BleachedAnusDawg said:Isn't Haener a senior?
-
This. Haener pretty much proves how awful our offensive system is. I don't get why we are still acting like the shit stain of our offense in a meaningless game is the final word on Huard.AtomicDawg said:
I am not writing off Sam yet. All his strengths are about knowing the scheme, getting rid of the ball at the right time and touch on the deeper routes. If haener can be reformed so can Sam.RoadDawg55 said:
Sam sucks. Sorry, but if he was any good at all he would have beat out Morris. If he leaves we get a QB that is actually good.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Haener next year would be fine by me. He probably will last 5 games before breaking in half but whatever. This conference sucks. Do your best every year to win it. Placating to Sam would be stupid at this point. Although it would be hilarious if jake transferred back and Sam won the job and had an awesome year. -
But we aren’t giving up on him? How is bringing in a better QB for one year so he can learn the offense giving up on him?sonics1993 said:
It was his first year, he had no QB coach and played under an interim OC with a dog shit OL and no running game. I can't see how we are giving up on him after one year.CuntWaffle said:
Then fuck him. If he thinks he earned the starting QB role by coming in and throwing 4 interceptions in his first start against WSU and wants to bail because he doesn’t want to compete then let him go.sonics1993 said:
Because I know Sam wants to play now and I don't expect him to stay if he doesn't get the job next year. If I knew Sam would 100% stay, then I'm fine with it, but that doesn't go along with what I have heard from his camp.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Why not both? Your take is getting stranger and stranger.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused.
This is the part of recruiting that drives me bat shit crazy. You can see the results but let’s ignore them because stars. -
Pretty sure Haener would have to come in as a grad transfer? You can't just switch teams twice.
-
Agree. I believe in Sam completely. I also believe he'll benefit from a coach and from competition.
Handing a QB the job never brings out the best in him. -
Why not bring over the entire Fresno roster and almost beat Oregon, again?RaceBannon said:
Haener left rather than compete. Fuck himRoadDawg55 said:
Sam sucks. Sorry, but if he was any good at all he would have beat out Morris. If he leaves we get a QB that is actually good.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
-
I agree completely with that but that's college football in 2021. If he stays, I love the move but if he leaves then the move doesn't make much sense to me.dnc said:Agree. I believe in Sam completely. I also believe he'll benefit from a coach and from competition.
Handing a QB the job never brings out the best in him.
