Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jake Haener
Comments
-
It’s concerning to hear that Haener could come back
-
The real news here is that we get Julie Haener back
-
In that case it might be best to have a QB who knows the offense and is a known quantity at this level. Haener would have answers and be able to teach the offense.sonics1993 said:
The team went 4-8, will have back-to-back mediocre recruiting classes, and a decent amount of talent leave the program; it's a rebuild.Kingdome_Urinals said:UW was only a functioning scheme and QB away from 1 or 2 losses last year. It's not a rebuild.
-
He would which means he would have to be accepted into a graduate program which isn't a guaranteeKingdome_Urinals said:Pretty sure Haener would have to come in as a grad transfer? You can't just switch teams twice.
-
-
Y'all have some low standards if that's what you SIMP over.UW_Doog_Bot said: -
Pac 12 was .500 vs Mountain West this year. 16-24 since 2016 and 13-12 against them in bowl games. Let’s not pretend like the Pac 12 is a juggernaut conference in comparison.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused. -
Some really bad takes in here. I think some are like 12 years old with a keyboard. Commiting to build a program around a freshmen qb that may or may not be good is beyond stupid. All we know about Sam is he looked good in high school, couldn’t beat shit qb play and looked bad in his one chance. I still think he will be good with proper coaching and threat of a rushing attack.
DeBoer can develop a qb. Let the cream rise to the top. If sam wants to play next year he should play better than all other qb’s. They all sucked bad this last year and the scheme sucked worse. No spots should be given.
If people want to leave the program because of that mindset so be it. They are the problem and why the players and position groups are soft as charmin. -
I'm not saying that at all, but I'm being realistic about where Washington stands in terms of talent. I don't think we are talented as we seem and that this needs to be torn down and rebuilt back up with a culture change which takes time.CuntWaffle said:
Pac 12 was .500 vs Mountain West this year. 16-24 since 2016 and 13-12 against them in bowl games. Let’s not pretend like the Pac 12 is a juggernaut conference in comparison.sonics1993 said:
If Jake Haener can't win the Mountain West, how in the world do you expect him to win the Pac-12? The whole point of hiring him was that he can develop talent. Well then develop, Sam, that's why you were brought here.CuntWaffle said:
Haener would have 1 year, he wouldn’t be coming over with 3 years of eligibility left. I doubt Huard leaves because of that and if he does well fuck him then.sonics1993 said:It's not like we are contending next year, so why not start building with Sam? And worst case, what if Sam leaves?
Not contending? So we should just throw the season away and not try to get a better draft pick? I’m confused. -
Being related to a football player raises baseline attractiveness by 2 points, them's the rules.sonics1993 said:
Y'all have some low standards if that's what you SIMP over.UW_Doog_Bot said:
