So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.
Some deep/surveillance state, huh?
States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.
Update the rolls by telepathy?
Is that how it's done?
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.
So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.
Some deep/surveillance state, huh?
States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.
Update the rolls by telepathy?
Is that how it's done?
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.
So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.
Some deep/surveillance state, huh?
States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.
Update the rolls by telepathy?
Is that how it's done?
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.
So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.
Some deep/surveillance state, huh?
States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.
Update the rolls by telepathy?
Is that how it's done?
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.
So a guy moved two years ago and thinks the registrar should have noticed.
Some deep/surveillance state, huh?
States can and should update the voter rolls at least once a year, no? Or is it racist voter purging, as it was called by Stacey Abrams in Georgia.
Update the rolls by telepathy?
Is that how it's done?
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.
Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.
Why do other countries require voter id?
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)
So why not state ID which we have now.
Oh I just answered my question
Don't support an obvious solution that is available today. Go for a horrible solution that no one wants other than fascists.
California automatically registers any one unless they opt out. Including illegals!
About 450k people sent jury summons responded they couldn't serve because they're not not citizens!
Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.
Why do other countries require voter id?
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)
So why not state ID which we have now.
Oh I just answered my question
Don't support an obvious solution that is available today. Go for a horrible solution that no one wants other than fascists.
California automatically registers any one unless they opt out. Including illegals!
About 450k people sent jury summons responded they couldn't serve because they're not not citizens!
Anyone can show up register and vote as well.
Right.
They do it all the time. They just don't ever get caught.
Here's a thought: don't commit a felony by trying to vote the ballot.
Yeah, you keep saying that. I'd also like to ask all citizens to not commit crimes. Just a thought.
I just don't vote my kids' ballots when they arrive here. It's a system that's worked for me.
So, your the last honest leftard (like that's even remotely true). You lie like a rug right now for political power and I'm supposed to believe that you actually care about ballot integrity.
Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.
Why do other countries require voter id?
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)
Are there are reasons that are presumably racist?
Seems like an argument there are would fail.
So it's not racist to require voter id.
It's not racist to require a National ID, issued to every citizen without exception at the nation's expense. Apparently it's merely fascist, per Race.
Is it racist to require that ID to vote? And if it is issued to a citizen?
A national ID is issued to citizens. If we uniformly say you have to show it as a condition of voting, I don't see how that can be racist.
A fucking waste of time and resources, sure, but not racist.
I'd have to ask again why other countries do it if it's such a fucking waste of time.
Taking the information off the ID is probably just a substitute for what a poll worker already asks you at a polling place in the U.S. If it ever became the norm here, the same substitution of energy would apply. But the actual implementation of a national ID program, if it is implemented solely in order to prevent voter impersonation, is an enormous waste of money and effort. The crime isn't being committed in the first place.
But leaving behind billions of weapons isn’t an enormous waste of money, Dazzler?
Comments
Then "We the people" is familiar to you.
What movie?
Here's a thought: don't commit a felony by trying to vote the ballot.
About 450k people sent jury summons responded they couldn't serve because they're not not citizens!
Anyone can show up register and vote as well.
They do it all the time. They just don't ever get caught.
Got it?
"States are based on residency not citizenship"
What does it mean?
Quite the selective fiscal conservative.