Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Obvious Voting-Rights Solution That No Democrat Will Propose
Comments
-
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar. -
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.
-
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
-
If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.HHusky said:
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot. -
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship. -
People move across state lines all the time without intending to change their citizenship.hardhat said:
If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.HHusky said:
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.
And voter rolls will always be imperfect. But if our Virginia pal will stop voting his California ballots, I'm sure California will remove him. -
But any attempt to make the process better is racist. Got it.HHusky said:
People move across state lines all the time without intending to change their citizenship.hardhat said:
If only there were ways for a state to flag things like that proactively. Well shoots, I reckon we'll just wait for everyone that moves to notify us.HHusky said:
Doubt they "found him" anymore than any other address forwarding system "finds" someone.hardhat said:
Someone moves out of state, California finds them, and sends them a ballot. No problem there.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
A really simple solution is to remove himself from the rolls by notifying the registrar.
Simple solution, if he intended a change of state citizenship, don't vote the California ballot.
And voter rolls will always be imperfect. -
States are based on residency not citizenship
-
Oh good.hardhat said:
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Then "We the people" is familiar to you. -
Is there a version in English?RaceBannon said:States are based on residency not citizenship
-
Movie quote whoosh.HHusky said:
Oh good.hardhat said:
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Then "We the people" is familiar to you. -
Okayhardhat said:
Movie quote whoosh.HHusky said:
Oh good.hardhat said:
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Then "We the people" is familiar to you.
What movie? -
C'mon manHHusky said:
Okayhardhat said:
Movie quote whoosh.HHusky said:
Oh good.hardhat said:
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Then "We the people" is familiar to you.
What movie? -
I'm sure I haven't seen it, whatever it is.hardhat said:
C'mon manHHusky said:
Okayhardhat said:
Movie quote whoosh.HHusky said:
Oh good.hardhat said:
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?HHusky said:
You're not American?hardhat said:
We?HHusky said:
It's a good thing we actually police things like that. At least a couple of Daddy's voters learned that the hard way.hardhat said:
It is a problem, because he/she/they can. So can anyone who gets the ballots, mailed to dead people and so on. But as long as they vote democrat, no biggie I guess.HHusky said:
He doesn't have to vote his ballot. It's not much of a problem.hardhat said:
Attaboy. But you do see the problem. No state sits back passively and waits to be notified. But we are talking about California here, and so it's not surprising.HHusky said:
I'm sure he'll be dropped before long, assuming he hasn't been casting his California ballots.hardhat said:
It's the state's responsibility to keep up to date and accurate voter rolls. I thought you were the expert on civics here. Sheesh.HHusky said:
I'm asking you. You think the registrar should have understood the voter's intent?hardhat said:
Is that how it's done?HHusky said:
Update the rolls by telepathy?hardhat said:
The presumption is in favor of an existing state citizenship in the absence of a clear intent to change one's state citizenship.
Then "We the people" is familiar to you.
What movie? -
-
-
California automatically registers any one unless they opt out. Including illegals!RaceBannon said:
So why not state ID which we have now.HHusky said:
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)hardhat said:
Why do other countries require voter id?TheKobeStopper said:
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.thechatch said:Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
Oh I just answered my question
Don't support an obvious solution that is available today. Go for a horrible solution that no one wants other than fascists.
About 450k people sent jury summons responded they couldn't serve because they're not not citizens!
Anyone can show up register and vote as well. -
Right.Sledog said:
California automatically registers any one unless they opt out. Including illegals!RaceBannon said:
So why not state ID which we have now.HHusky said:
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)hardhat said:
Why do other countries require voter id?TheKobeStopper said:
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.thechatch said:Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
Oh I just answered my question
Don't support an obvious solution that is available today. Go for a horrible solution that no one wants other than fascists.
About 450k people sent jury summons responded they couldn't serve because they're not not citizens!
Anyone can show up register and vote as well.
They do it all the time. They just don't ever get caught.
-
I just don't vote my kids' ballots when they arrive here. It's a system that's worked for me.hardhat said: -
So, your the last honest leftard (like that's even remotely true). You lie like a rug right now for political power and I'm supposed to believe that you actually care about ballot integrity.HHusky said:
I just don't vote my kids' ballots when they arrive here. It's a system that's worked for me.hardhat said: -
I know you’re stupid but This stupid?HHusky said:
In English?doogie said:
It’s now King County’s responsibility to keep track of your free shit you’ve already been given?HHusky said:
Which counties are giving away birth certificates? (King County wants $25)RaceBannon said:
That would be now dumbassHHusky said:
When people aren't spending money they don't have in order to get "free state ID", you'll have a point.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:Voter-ID requirements are the norm in many countries, as Republicans are fond of pointing out. But so are national ID cards.
I've been saying this for years. Just provide everyone a national ID card.
Which side of the aisle will most strongly object to that proposal?
The side that aren’t fascistRaceBannon said:Of course the left wants a national ID registry
They just gave the Taliban the one from Afghanistan
States run elections
Squeal like a pig over free state ID
Demand a national data base
Fuck off
Till then . . .
Fuck off -
You're stupidHHusky said:
Is there a version in English?RaceBannon said:States are based on residency not citizenship
Got it? -
Not stupid enough to have said this:RaceBannon said:
You're stupidHHusky said:
Is there a version in English?RaceBannon said:States are based on residency not citizenship
Got it?
"States are based on residency not citizenship"
What does it mean? -
DisagreeHHusky said:
Not stupid enough to have said this:RaceBannon said:
You're stupidHHusky said:
Is there a version in English?RaceBannon said:States are based on residency not citizenship
Got it?
"States are based on residency not citizenship"
What does it mean? -
But leaving behind billions of weapons isn’t an enormous waste of money, Dazzler?HHusky said:
Taking the information off the ID is probably just a substitute for what a poll worker already asks you at a polling place in the U.S. If it ever became the norm here, the same substitution of energy would apply. But the actual implementation of a national ID program, if it is implemented solely in order to prevent voter impersonation, is an enormous waste of money and effort. The crime isn't being committed in the first place.hardhat said:
I'd have to ask again why other countries do it if it's such a fucking waste of time.HHusky said:
A national ID is issued to citizens. If we uniformly say you have to show it as a condition of voting, I don't see how that can be racist.hardhat said:
Is it racist to require that ID to vote? And if it is issued to a citizen?HHusky said:
It's not racist to require a National ID, issued to every citizen without exception at the nation's expense. Apparently it's merely fascist, per Race.hardhat said:
So it's not racist to require voter id.HHusky said:
Seems like an argument there are would fail.hardhat said:
Are there are reasons that are presumably racist?HHusky said:
Presumably they require you show your national ID for all sorts of reasons. I'm not the one against a national ID. ("Your papers!" memes to follow from the libertarian hen faction.)hardhat said:
Why do other countries require voter id?TheKobeStopper said:
I’m letting the free market decide if those businesses are racist. The government, however, answers to me.thechatch said:Still waiting for @TheKobeStopper to explain why voter ID is racist while vax cards to eat at restaurants or fly on airplanes is not.
A fucking waste of time and resources, sure, but not racist.
Quite the selective fiscal conservative.
