So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.
I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.
Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.
But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.
You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.
You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.
Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.
NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.
Where are your documents?
So best case scenario I see for Biden is that Hunter is a security/blackmail risk due to his inability to stay out of compromising positions or situations
But you’re right ... what does that have to do with Joe
This focus on comparing Biden against Trump as if that’s the standard is so full of shit ...
How low of a bar can you get for Biden between now and he resigns his office to Kamala at some point in 2023?
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.
Great your back to your weird usage of gals and daddy.
So Hunter is a fucking mess--long known--and the best you and Sean have is that Joe hasn't disowned him.
I haven't been this outraged since Obama asked for fancy mustard.
Interesting, because that wasn't the party line when Hunter was being hired for Ukrainian energy companies. Then is was Hunter was a highly qualified attorney who obviously belonged on the BOD
You'll recall I believed he was simply trading on his last name.
I recall you saying the laptop was Russian disinformation. And I also recall your silence when Joe claimed there was nothing to the story about Hunter getting paid by Burisma. In fact you ran interference saying shit like "well it's a good thing I'm not voting for Hunter."
I guess I "ran interference" by pointing out that Joe Biden was the candidate for President. Congrats to you girls for nailing one of his relatives.
But Trump's 'relatives'. I was disturbed by the images of girls nailing Biden's relatives though. May have to flag.
Daddy made his relatives part of his administration and campaign.
Why would Cho Bai Den do that? Hunter is an earner.
You don’t take your top revenue producer off the road and put him in an office.
You gals ever going to provide evidence that Joe got any money out of this? Seems like the Right Wing media would have an incentive to prove that.
Hunter is an addict and a mess and apparently your star “witness”. An addict who unremarkably tried to justify his own actions.
NYT provided detailed information and documents on the felonies of the Trump Crime Family. That ultimately led to the resignation of Daddy’s sister from the federal bench.
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
Deflect Deflect Deflect
I can’t wait for all the shit that was painfully obvious to me regarding Biden materializes and people that steadfastly defended him are left trying to rationalize the runaway train they enabled
Lots of Right Wing news outlets in this country. Why are they “covering up” for Joe?
Remember when the Ny Post was locked out of twitter and couldn’t post the laptop story?
That doesn’t answer the question. NY Post doesn’t have any records of Joe getting a “cut”, so they haven’t been prevented from publishing such records.
What does joe getting a cut have to do with the media, big tech, and yiu covering it up? Does that make it OK? And if it’s NO BIG DEAL, why the obfuscation.
I recognize that there was a desire to prevent sensationalism from potentially deciding the election. Especially with foreign enemies anxious to exploit these stories. The press and big tech had been complicit in spreading bullshit in 2016. They were more paternalistic and cautious in 2020.
You mean like bountygate and losers and suckers?
Bountygate? You mean the suspected bounty on American troops that Daddy didn’t even ask Putin to admit or deny? #CommanderInChief!
Yes that one! That turned out to be false but was hyped and sensationalized. How many own goals are you going to score? Do you think Trump would have been afraid to ask if it wasn’t complete bullshit?
It hasn’t been proven false. And Daddy apparently didn’t think it was his place to ask his boss about it.
Zero evidence. If it was true this would still be a huge story. What were you saying about the media not wanting contribute to bullshit. Switch this to now, if ‘anonymous’ sources said this was true about Biden, you’d call them girls and say there’s no evidence. Or should we talk about Benghazi?
So Hunter whining to his sister about having to cut his Dad in isn't evidence. So, Tony Bubulinski having emails confirming that the Big Guy is getting 10% in the "deal" isn't evidence. But the dazzler having strong feelz about Trump colluding with the Russians is hard evidence.
Comments
But you’re right ... what does that have to do with Joe
This focus on comparing Biden against Trump as if that’s the standard is so full of shit ...
How low of a bar can you get for Biden between now and he resigns his office to Kamala at some point in 2023?
You are one bizarre motherfucker
Fuck off, shill.
I can’t wait for all the shit that was painfully obvious to me regarding Biden materializes and people that steadfastly defended him are left trying to rationalize the runaway train they enabled