Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Give Me Your Best Argument Against Voter ID

12357…13

Comments

  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,427 Founders Club
    Just wondering

    Is there one person of color in this thread?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Is that Racist speak for “I can figure out how to get ID but of course “They “ can’t?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:

    Just wondering

    Is there one person of color in this thread?

    I'm purple.

    For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,427 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Just wondering

    Is there one person of color in this thread?

    I'm purple.

    For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election.



    Was just wondering
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:


    PurpleThrobber said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Just wondering

    Is there one person of color in this thread?

    I'm purple.

    For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election.



    Was just wondering
    I'm purple. Now you know. To counter @TheKobeStopper hate all white people agenda.

    He can hate purple people now too.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,240 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    thechatch said:

    HH has now posted multiple times in this thread and was incapable of offering a reasonable explanation as to why one needs identification to check out a library book, but not to participate in our most sacred of democratic processes.

    “It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist”, he mutters.

    Meanwhile, half of the US population has serious concerns, regarding election fraud.

    But it’s apparently not a problem.

    If you wanted to make sure our election process was beyond reproach, you would be in favor of requiring ID at the polls. You would also be in favor of making it illegal to harvest ballots, and VBM would only be granted to individuals under narrow qualifications, and votes would be processed and counted by an equal representation of both political parties by bonded officials.

    One side is in favor of all of the above. The other is crying racism and doing everything they can to maintain and expand on the status quo.

    Why is that? If there is no issue with voter fraud, why wouldn’t you have the balls to say, “fine, assholes. Here’s your Voter ID law. Here’s a law that ends ballot harvesting. Here’s a law that guarantees fair and accurate counting at our election centers. We’ll still win.”

    But you won’t do that. And everyone knows why. Have some fucking balls and just admit it.

    This could be a compelling argument if you hadn’t already accused the Democratic Party of every other type of election fraud.

    The idea that we’ll pass voter ID laws and then you’ll just accept the results is ridiculous. You’ll claim we burned ballots and machines changed votes.

    Reaching the goal posts, against someone who’s just going to move it, is pointless. You know who is most likely to not have IDs and you want to prevent them from voting, period.
    Hilarious that you acknowledge changing goalposts as a bad thing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.

    Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.

    My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.

    He sounds stupid

    Not surprised you hired him
    Okay this shit was blow coffee out your nose and butt funny.
    Careful pop. Coffee is a gateway to harder drugs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    TurdBomber said:

    Swaye said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.

    Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.

    My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.

    He sounds stupid

    Not surprised you hired him
    Okay this shit was blow coffee out your nose and butt funny.
    Careful pop. Coffee is a gateway to harder drugs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    edited March 2021
    Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.

    And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.

    Strong work, ladies!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter