Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
This is patently dishonest.
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
What other conspiracy theories should we cater to ‘cuz the nuts need to have their “faith” restored?
How about a Mueller investigation of fake collusion?
Not enough evidence to prove criminality beyond a reasonable doubt is the new “exoneration”.
Not having enough evidence to charge someone or to even make a case is the new "guilty" when you prosecute them in the press. Remember now, this Kunt holds himself out to be a HUGE defender of our norms and traditions. No need to make your case in a court of law, just prosecute them in the press.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
Should we get rid of the requirement to show ID when you enter a Federal building Dazzler? Your refusal to answer any questions that are put to you is telling.
Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
This is patently dishonest.
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
What other conspiracy theories should we cater to ‘cuz the nuts need to have their “faith” restored?
How about a Mueller investigation of fake collusion?
Not enough evidence to prove criminality beyond a reasonable doubt is the new “exoneration”.
Not having enough evidence to charge someone or to even make a case is the new "guilty" when you prosecute them in the press. Remember now, this Kunt holds himself out to be a HUGE defender of our norms and traditions. No need to make your case in a court of law, just prosecute them in the press.
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question. Of course Krauthammer wrote that column well before we knew about the abuses of the FISA court and prosecutorial misconduct of the Mueller team but Dazzler keeps fucking his chicken.
Mueller's case was so strong that he didn't bring it, and didn't think he could even get a conviction with a DC jury. But hey Krauthammer wrote a column in July of 2017!!!!
And it's not as if Mueller would never file an indictment against people he knew he could never prosecute. He filed charges against Russians that he knew were never going to see the inside of US court room, purely for its PR value.
But in this case we're to believe that Mueller had a rock solid case of "collusion" but he just was too ethical to pull the trigger.
Tell me again about Krauthammer's OpEd lightweight.
Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
This is patently dishonest.
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
I think most people acknowledge that having a valid ID to vote is a common sense requirement on the face of it.
The argument you're looking for that's against it is that it's a solution in search of a problem. The argument continues that there is no material threat of voter fraud given the inherent obstacles to orchestrating it at a meaningful level. So in practice a lot of people who are otherwise eligible voters but live in states/regions that have poor access to obtaining valid IDs (unreasonable distances to DOL offices in some counties, lack of transportation for low income prospective voters, lack of available free time to make the journey, minimal open hours of DOL offices, etc) end up not getting the IDs. All of this ultimately creates a disincentive for voting that disproportionately impacts lower income folks. Philosophically, these people believe that encouraging more people voting is something that strengthens a democracy.
There are plenty of other considerations that round out the argument, such as some states' very arbitrary enforcement of what constitutes "valid ID" for voting purposes, but that's the jist of it. If you don't believe any of the above assumptions, especially around voter fraud not being a material risk, then you probably won't find this argument very persuasive. Unsurprisingly, about 95% of the Tug is going to be in that camp.
Mueller's case was so strong that he didn't bring it, and didn't think he could even get a conviction with a DC jury. But hey Krauthammer wrote a column in July of 2017!!!!
And it's not as if Mueller would never file an indictment against people he knew he could never prosecute. He filed charges against Russians that he knew were never going to see the inside of US court room, purely for its PR value.
But in this case we're to believe that Mueller had a rock solid case of "collusion" but he just was too ethical to pull the trigger.
Tell me again about Krauthammer's OpEd lightweight.
The dazzler continues to ignore the real collusion between the CIA, DOJ, FBI and the PIPS campaign paying for the Russian disinformation. Or unlike Cho Bai Den's quid pro quo for his son and the millions that flowed to the Biden family. Just more evidence of the strong character that is so attractive to Snow and the dazzler.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
One of the things I found shocking once I started working was the number of clients who has SERIOUS money embezzled by "trusted" employees who they essentially treated as family. Controllers who made the bank deposits, "balanced" the bank statements and approved vendor invoices and "prepared" the financial statements.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
You're accidentally making very good point.
The motive to steal a large amount of money even at the risk of committing a felony is obvious.
The motive to commit a felony in order to add a single vote is absent.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
One of the things I found shocking once I started working was the number of clients who has SERIOUS money embezzled by "trusted" employees who they essentially treated as family. Controllers who made the bank deposits, "balanced" the bank statements and approved vendor invoices and "prepared" the financial statements.
Opportunity plus temptation = bad system = impropriety. It NEVER fails. It is always that. It boggle your mind what I've uncovered in my career committed by the 'nicest' people.
But somehow the Dazzler thinks every election process is pure as the driven snow.
Mueller's case was so strong that he didn't bring it, and didn't think he could even get a conviction with a DC jury. But hey Krauthammer wrote a column in July of 2017!!!!
And it's not as if Mueller would never file an indictment against people he knew he could never prosecute. He filed charges against Russians that he knew were never going to see the inside of US court room, purely for its PR value.
But in this case we're to believe that Mueller had a rock solid case of "collusion" but he just was too ethical to pull the trigger.
Tell me again about Krauthammer's OpEd lightweight.
The dazzler continues to ignore the real collusion between the CIA, DOJ, FBI and the PIPS campaign paying for the Russian disinformation. Or unlike Cho Bai Den's quid pro quo for his son and the millions that flowed to the Biden family. Just more evidence of the strong character that is so attractive to Snow and the dazzler.
Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
This is patently dishonest.
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
I think most people acknowledge that having a valid ID to vote is a common sense requirement on the face of it.
The argument you're looking for that's against it is that it's a solution in search of a problem. The argument continues that there is no material threat of voter fraud given the inherent obstacles to orchestrating it at a meaningful level. So in practice a lot of people who are otherwise eligible voters but live in states/regions that have poor access to obtaining valid IDs (unreasonable distances to DOL offices in some counties, lack of transportation for low income prospective voters, lack of available free time to make the journey, minimal open hours of DOL offices, etc) end up not getting the IDs. All of this ultimately creates a disincentive for voting that disproportionately impacts lower income folks. Philosophically, these people believe that encouraging more people voting is something that strengthens a democracy.
There are plenty of other considerations that round out the argument, such as some states' very arbitrary enforcement of what constitutes "valid ID" for voting purposes, but that's the jist of it. If you don't believe any of the above assumptions, especially around voter fraud not being a material risk, then you probably won't find this argument very persuasive. Unsurprisingly, about 95% of the Tug is going to be in that camp.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
One of the things I found shocking once I started working was the number of clients who has SERIOUS money embezzled by "trusted" employees who they essentially treated as family. Controllers who made the bank deposits, "balanced" the bank statements and approved vendor invoices and "prepared" the financial statements.
Opportunity plus temptation = bad system = impropriety. It NEVER fails. It is always that. It boggle your mind what I've uncovered in my career committed by the 'nicest' people.
But somehow the Dazzler thinks every election process is pure as the driven snow.
Bullshit.
The dazzler likes to pretend he has an MBA and provides solid business advice to his clients. Really.
voter fraud does happen - not often, but how accurate does it have to be? Only investigate when it can change an outcome? Investigate and clean it up before the next election? If we want good elections, it would be nice to have the voter roles accurate. My mom has passed away, I really do not want her voting.
From the Heritage Foundation As of December 2019, the Heritage Foundation's Voter Fraud Database contained what the group identified as 1,241 cases of proven voter fraud and 1,071 criminal convictions. Heritage said the database "presents a sampling of proven instances of election fraud from across the country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list, but is intended to demonstrate the many ways in which fraud is committed. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process." The group also said that each of the instances in the database "resulted in either a criminal conviction or an overturned election. The database categorized instances of fraud into the following:
Ineligible Voting Absentee Ballot Fraud Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots Altering The Vote Count Buying Votes Ballot Petition Fraud Duplicate Voting False Registrations Altering The Vote Count Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls Impersonation Fraud At The Polls
In 2013, the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) sent 63 people to polls to attempt to vote under ineligible voters' names as part of an investigation. DOI reported that 61 people were able to do so.[4] DOI's website describes the department as "the City's independent Inspector General (IG), with oversight of City agencies and commissions, elected officials, employees, contractors, and those who receive benefits from the City.
Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
H stands here before us and declares that all U.S. elections are air-tight with no instances of fraud anywhere.
What a fucking retard. Seriously, you're giving Sled and DJ a run for their money.
Try reading for comprehension sometime, TurdBrain.
Try, for once in your life, to think through your own argument before spewing bullshit from your mouth, amateur.
Do I have to spell out the ABCs of how voter ID laws are designed to prevent voter fraud, you fucking moron?
I realize your ideas and interpretations are always half-baked, as usual and at best, but you might once think about what you're saying before you write it down.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
One of the things I found shocking once I started working was the number of clients who has SERIOUS money embezzled by "trusted" employees who they essentially treated as family. Controllers who made the bank deposits, "balanced" the bank statements and approved vendor invoices and "prepared" the financial statements.
Opportunity plus temptation = bad system = impropriety. It NEVER fails. It is always that. It boggle your mind what I've uncovered in my career committed by the 'nicest' people.
But somehow the Dazzler thinks every election process is pure as the driven snow.
Bullshit.
The dazzler likes to pretend he has an MBA and provides solid business advice to his clients. Really.
Comical. The "temptation" to add one vote is just like the temptation to take $10,000.
So naturally, you would just walk straight up to a poll worker and impersonate a voter without any knowledge of whether that voter already voted, or whether the poll worker knows the voter, etc.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
You're accidentally making very good point.
The motive to steal a large amount of money even at the risk of committing a felony is obvious.
The motive to commit a felony in order to add a single vote is absent.
I don't accidentally make a point. I've earned hundreds of thousands of dollars uncovering this kind of shit, fool.
Your premise is based on one vote. Real crooks don't knock off 7-11 stores. They go for armored cars. People aren't fucking around with sneaking a single vote. And they know the holes that exist in the system and exploit them.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
You're accidentally making very good point.
The motive to steal a large amount of money even at the risk of committing a felony is obvious.
The motive to commit a felony in order to add a single vote is absent.
I don't accidentally make a point. I've earned hundreds of thousands of dollars uncovering this kind of shit, fool.
Your premise is based on one vote. Real crooks don't knock off 7-11 stores. They go for armored cars. People aren't fucking around with sneaking a single vote.
Steaming toward page 5 and HH still has nothing to offer. What a useless fucking hack you are.
Madam, voter impersonation isn't happening. Your refusal to engage with that basic truth is telling.
And what leads you to that conclusion, Dazzler?
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
You're accidentally making very good point.
The motive to steal a large amount of money even at the risk of committing a felony is obvious.
The motive to commit a felony in order to add a single vote is absent.
I don't accidentally make a point. I've earned hundreds of thousands of dollars uncovering this kind of shit, fool.
Your premise is based on one vote. Real crooks don't knock off 7-11 stores. They go for armored cars. People aren't fucking around with sneaking a single vote.
Comments
And it's not as if Mueller would never file an indictment against people he knew he could never prosecute. He filed charges against Russians that he knew were never going to see the inside of US court room, purely for its PR value.
But in this case we're to believe that Mueller had a rock solid case of "collusion" but he just was too ethical to pull the trigger.
Tell me again about Krauthammer's OpEd lightweight.
But an Article of Faith among the Left.
You know jack shit about systems and controls and human behavior. If proper controls aren't in place, this is standard criminal/embezzlement drive a truck through and steal the gold shit. Responsible people lock down ANY identifiable potential for wrong doing. I've personally uncovered 5 people who subsequently went to prison for circumventing controls. And you don't think the most powerful office in the world wouldn't be subject to people trying to grab it? You're a fucking idiot beyond compare. Level 8 fucktard.
You just let your employees have access to cash drawer or let them do all accounting functions in your pretend practice? NO - because that would be fucking stupid to give them the opportunity when combined with the temptation to take your money.
Or maybe you are such a fucktard that you 'trust' your bookkeeper completely. She is ripping you off blind if so.
Fuck.
The motive to steal a large amount of money even at the risk of committing a felony is obvious.
The motive to commit a felony in order to add a single vote is absent.
But somehow the Dazzler thinks every election process is pure as the driven snow.
Bullshit.
From the Heritage Foundation
As of December 2019, the Heritage Foundation's Voter Fraud Database contained what the group identified as 1,241 cases of proven voter fraud and 1,071 criminal convictions. Heritage said the database "presents a sampling of proven instances of election fraud from across the country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list, but is intended to demonstrate the many ways in which fraud is committed. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process." The group also said that each of the instances in the database "resulted in either a criminal conviction or an overturned election.
The database categorized instances of fraud into the following:
Ineligible Voting
Absentee Ballot Fraud
Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots
Altering The Vote Count
Buying Votes
Ballot Petition Fraud
Duplicate Voting
False Registrations
Altering The Vote Count
Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls
Impersonation Fraud At The Polls
In 2013, the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) sent 63 people to polls to attempt to vote under ineligible voters' names as part of an investigation. DOI reported that 61 people were able to do so.[4] DOI's website describes the department as "the City's independent Inspector General (IG), with oversight of City agencies and commissions, elected officials, employees, contractors, and those who receive benefits from the City.
https://ballotpedia.org/Electoral_fraud
Do I have to spell out the ABCs of how voter ID laws are designed to prevent voter fraud, you fucking moron?
I realize your ideas and interpretations are always half-baked, as usual and at best, but you might once think about what you're saying before you write it down.
So naturally, you would just walk straight up to a poll worker and impersonate a voter without any knowledge of whether that voter already voted, or whether the poll worker knows the voter, etc.
Don't quit your day jobs, ladies.
Your premise is based on one vote. Real crooks don't knock off 7-11 stores. They go for armored cars. People aren't fucking around with sneaking a single vote. And they know the holes that exist in the system and exploit them.
Only co conspirators argue against closing holes.
Fuck off.
Stubbornly stupid.
That prevents voter impersonation (possibly).
Nothing else.
Too bad you can't grasp it.
Good job by Trump to clean it up for 2020
Now if we can get the runway model her rightful place as Georgia governor we're good