Give Me Your Best Argument Against Voter ID
Comments
-
Goes without saying.PurpleThrobber said:
You must have missed this part:HHusky said:
He knows how to contact the County in which he was born. He did that long before he asked me about it.PurpleThrobber said:
Stop lying, Dazzler. "Literally" you go to this magic answer box on google/bing/duck duck go and type in 'How to obtain a birth certificate in Seattle". Pick any fucking town or county you want.HHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
Damn- there's a link. It's 'literally' a 3 second process.
https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/vital-statistics/birth.aspx
So you fleeced him at your hourly rate instead of paying $25 - fuck off.
This is a little like the argument you gals all loved about Covid: "I don't know any of the (500,000+) people who died, so it seems like a hoax to me."
Fuck off. -
This could be a compelling argument if you hadn’t already accused the Democratic Party of every other type of election fraud.thechatch said:HH has now posted multiple times in this thread and was incapable of offering a reasonable explanation as to why one needs identification to check out a library book, but not to participate in our most sacred of democratic processes.
“It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist”, he mutters.
Meanwhile, half of the US population has serious concerns, regarding election fraud.
But it’s apparently not a problem.
If you wanted to make sure our election process was beyond reproach, you would be in favor of requiring ID at the polls. You would also be in favor of making it illegal to harvest ballots, and VBM would only be granted to individuals under narrow qualifications, and votes would be processed and counted by an equal representation of both political parties by bonded officials.
One side is in favor of all of the above. The other is crying racism and doing everything they can to maintain and expand on the status quo.
Why is that? If there is no issue with voter fraud, why wouldn’t you have the balls to say, “fine, assholes. Here’s your Voter ID law. Here’s a law that ends ballot harvesting. Here’s a law that guarantees fair and accurate counting at our election centers. We’ll still win.”
But you won’t do that. And everyone knows why. Have some fucking balls and just admit it.
The idea that we’ll pass voter ID laws and then you’ll just accept the results is ridiculous. You’ll claim we burned ballots and machines changed votes.
Reaching the goal posts, against someone who’s just going to move it, is pointless. You know who is most likely to not have IDs and you want to prevent them from voting, period. -
A stupid as you obviously are means you don't know shit. But you have confirmed that yourself 100's of times.HHusky said:
As much as I'm inclined to agree with the argument that something Sled can do almost any fucking retard should be able to do, the difficulty for the guy I'm talking about is trivial, but it is creating a real obstacle for him. But congrats on your success, Sled.Sledog said:
I had to get one recently took 3 whole days to get almost all the way across the country from order to receipt. It was so hard!HHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
But being a loony lefty it was inevitable. -
Yet it doesn't stick.HHusky said:
Goes without saying.PurpleThrobber said:
You must have missed this part:HHusky said:
He knows how to contact the County in which he was born. He did that long before he asked me about it.PurpleThrobber said:
Stop lying, Dazzler. "Literally" you go to this magic answer box on google/bing/duck duck go and type in 'How to obtain a birth certificate in Seattle". Pick any fucking town or county you want.HHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
Damn- there's a link. It's 'literally' a 3 second process.
https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/vital-statistics/birth.aspx
So you fleeced him at your hourly rate instead of paying $25 - fuck off.
This is a little like the argument you gals all loved about Covid: "I don't know any of the (500,000+) people who died, so it seems like a hoax to me."
Fuck off.
So, fuck off.
-
Illegal aliens?TheKobeStopper said:
This could be a compelling argument if you hadn’t already accused the Democratic Party of every other type of election fraud.thechatch said:HH has now posted multiple times in this thread and was incapable of offering a reasonable explanation as to why one needs identification to check out a library book, but not to participate in our most sacred of democratic processes.
“It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist”, he mutters.
Meanwhile, half of the US population has serious concerns, regarding election fraud.
But it’s apparently not a problem.
If you wanted to make sure our election process was beyond reproach, you would be in favor of requiring ID at the polls. You would also be in favor of making it illegal to harvest ballots, and VBM would only be granted to individuals under narrow qualifications, and votes would be processed and counted by an equal representation of both political parties by bonded officials.
One side is in favor of all of the above. The other is crying racism and doing everything they can to maintain and expand on the status quo.
Why is that? If there is no issue with voter fraud, why wouldn’t you have the balls to say, “fine, assholes. Here’s your Voter ID law. Here’s a law that ends ballot harvesting. Here’s a law that guarantees fair and accurate counting at our election centers. We’ll still win.”
But you won’t do that. And everyone knows why. Have some fucking balls and just admit it.
The idea that we’ll pass voter ID laws and then you’ll just accept the results is ridiculous. You’ll claim we burned ballots and machines changed votes.
Reaching the goal posts, against someone who’s just going to move it, is pointless. You know who is most likely to not have IDs and you want to prevent them from voting, period.
Dead people?
-
Btw Kobe, your goalpost reasoning is pitiful.
“If we give you voter ID law you’ll just make up a different excuse so that’s why we say no.”
You’re a fucking clown. -
Dems best argument is they won't be able to steal elections.
-
WTF are you talking about? I posed an answer to the OP's question and you make it sound like I think there is voter fraud. Sorry never mentioned it in my poastHHusky said:LebamDawg said:The reason we should not have it
There are 24 things that need an ID according to the Washington Examiner -
it is good to have one thing out there where we don't need an ID.
Benefits: Every time I leave the house I have to check, do I have my wallet, is my ID in the wallet? Damn it is confusing.
Now I am going to vote, I walk down to the mailbox and insert ballot that my wife filled out for me, do not check for a wallet or ID, I saved 2-3 seconds and untold stressful moments.
Madam, I gave you a reason. It fixes a non-existent problem: in person voter impersonation. And at a cost of suppressing a not insignificant number of legitimate votes.thechatch said:HH has now posted multiple times in this thread and was incapable of offering a reasonable explanation as to why one needs identification to check out a library book, but not to participate in our most sacred of democratic processes.
“It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist”, he mutters.
Meanwhile, half of the US population has serious concerns, regarding election fraud.
But it’s apparently not a problem.
If you wanted to make sure our election process was beyond reproach, you would be in favor of requiring ID at the polls. You would also be in favor of making it illegal to harvest ballots, and VBM would only be granted to individuals under narrow qualifications, and votes would be processed and counted by an equal representation of both political parties by bonded officials.
One side is in favor of all of the above. The other is crying racism and doing everything they can to maintain and expand on the status quo.
Why is that? If there is no issue with voter fraud, why wouldn’t you have the balls to say, “fine, assholes. Here’s your Voter ID law. Here’s a law that ends ballot harvesting. Here’s a law that guarantees fair and accurate counting at our election centers. We’ll still win.”
But you won’t do that. And everyone knows why. Have some fucking balls and just admit it.
Feel free to continue to evade those basic truths. -
This thread makes me wonder what @HHusky is hiding from?
-
-
Just wondering
Is there one person of color in this thread? -
Is that Racist speak for “I can figure out how to get ID but of course “They “ can’t?
-
I'm purple.HuskyJW said:Just wondering
Is there one person of color in this thread?
For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election.
-
Was just wonderingPurpleThrobber said:
I'm purple.HuskyJW said:Just wondering
Is there one person of color in this thread?
For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election. -
I'm purple. Now you know. To counter @TheKobeStopper hate all white people agenda.HuskyJW said:
Was just wonderingPurpleThrobber said:
I'm purple.HuskyJW said:Just wondering
Is there one person of color in this thread?
For whatever relevance 'person of color' holds to requiring proof of eligibility to vote - and vote once per election.
He can hate purple people now too.
-
Okay this shit was blow coffee out your nose and butt funny.RaceBannon said:
He sounds stupidHHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
Not surprised you hired him -
Hilarious that you acknowledge changing goalposts as a bad thing.TheKobeStopper said:
This could be a compelling argument if you hadn’t already accused the Democratic Party of every other type of election fraud.thechatch said:HH has now posted multiple times in this thread and was incapable of offering a reasonable explanation as to why one needs identification to check out a library book, but not to participate in our most sacred of democratic processes.
“It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist”, he mutters.
Meanwhile, half of the US population has serious concerns, regarding election fraud.
But it’s apparently not a problem.
If you wanted to make sure our election process was beyond reproach, you would be in favor of requiring ID at the polls. You would also be in favor of making it illegal to harvest ballots, and VBM would only be granted to individuals under narrow qualifications, and votes would be processed and counted by an equal representation of both political parties by bonded officials.
One side is in favor of all of the above. The other is crying racism and doing everything they can to maintain and expand on the status quo.
Why is that? If there is no issue with voter fraud, why wouldn’t you have the balls to say, “fine, assholes. Here’s your Voter ID law. Here’s a law that ends ballot harvesting. Here’s a law that guarantees fair and accurate counting at our election centers. We’ll still win.”
But you won’t do that. And everyone knows why. Have some fucking balls and just admit it.
The idea that we’ll pass voter ID laws and then you’ll just accept the results is ridiculous. You’ll claim we burned ballots and machines changed votes.
Reaching the goal posts, against someone who’s just going to move it, is pointless. You know who is most likely to not have IDs and you want to prevent them from voting, period.
-
Careful pop. Coffee is a gateway to harder drugs.Swaye said:
Okay this shit was blow coffee out your nose and butt funny.RaceBannon said:
He sounds stupidHHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
Not surprised you hired him -
TurdBomber said:
Careful pop. Coffee is a gateway to harder drugs.Swaye said:
Okay this shit was blow coffee out your nose and butt funny.RaceBannon said:
He sounds stupidHHusky said:It's a solution in desperate search for a problem to solve.
Voter impersonation at the polls isn't a thing, for reasons that would become obvious to you if you thought about it at all. An ID requirement simply reduces voter participation.
My white, 66 year old, US born and bred plumber just asked me for advice on how he can get a birth certificate. He's having a Hell of a time for reasons that are fairly trivial. But it is illustrative.
Not surprised you hired him
-
Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies! -
The best argument for voter ID is to conduct fair and honest elections, eliminating the risk of voter fraud, duplicate ballots cast and ineligible voters. So if you're against any/all those things, you'd clearly fight against voter ID. Because, cheater.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
Fuck, you level up on stupid every fucking day. It is astounding and impressive at the same time. -
The most hilarious thing about this subject is we set up much more secure elections in Iraq etc.
-
Security has no place in election integrity
-
Arguing against Voter ID is like being in favor of 14 men on the field because you're afraid you can't beat the other team straight up.doogie said:Security has no place in election integrity
-
You do realize there is a dedicated board to talk Husky Basketball, right?PurpleThrobber said:
Arguing against Voter ID is like being in favor of 14 men on the field because you're afraid you can't beat the other team straight up.doogie said:Security has no place in election integrity
-
Voter ID = Keeping the snipe out of your gardenPurpleThrobber said:
Arguing against Voter ID is like being in favor of 14 men on the field because you're afraid you can't beat the other team straight up.doogie said:Security has no place in election integrity
-
You don't get bonus lives for leveling up on fucktardedness, Dazzler.HHusky said:
Voter ID = Keeping the snipe out of your gardenPurpleThrobber said:
Arguing against Voter ID is like being in favor of 14 men on the field because you're afraid you can't beat the other team straight up.doogie said:Security has no place in election integrity
-
This is patently dishonest.HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
The argument for government ID is to restore the public’s faith in our electoral process.
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response. -
-
It's mean and it's orange.thechatch said:HHusky said:Apparently the best argument FOR voter ID is that most people can get ID pretty easily.
And that prevents the commission of a felony that no one ever commits anyway.
Strong work, ladies!
The argument against it is......what, exactly?
We are nearly 4 pages in and you have offered fuck all as a response.
And RACIST!
That's about all I can decipher from these clowns.
