Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

MarinersFS

24

Comments

  • SteveInSheltonSteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    edited January 2014
    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    dhdawg said:

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
    Matches the expectations of the Seattle scarve-wearing hipsters who watch that cesspool of a team.

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745
    MisterEm said:

    dhdawg said:

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
    Matches the expectations of the Seattle scarve-wearing hipsters who watch that cesspool of a team.

    huh?

  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited January 2014
    it doesn't look like they're going to make any more moves. So the lineup is probably going to be
    1. Miller SS
    2. Seager 3B
    3. Cano 2B
    4. Hart DH
    decent 1-2-3-4
    then the fucking dreckfest begins
    5. Morrison LF
    6. Smoak 1B (this loser should've been gone 2 years ago)
    7. Zunino C
    8. Ackley CF
    9. Romero RF

    SP:
    Hernandez
    Iwakuma
    Walker
    Paxton
    #5 will be the only move they make
    Rotation isn't horrible

    Bullpen is awful, not one player in the pen isn't making limited salary, could've easily signed a Downs, or a Boone Logan, or a Balfour for barely over 5 million.

    the best I can see is 78-86
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,934 Founders Club
    dhdawg said:

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
    Exactly. They've hyped rally fries and kiddie nonsense for a long time, probably getting back to the late 90s, but back then they were actually winning and making the playoffs. At this pt. even some of the Marineroogs? can see they only care about profit. I fell for the b******* in the 2009-2010 offseason. They were coming off of a winning year and the FA acquisitions were supposed to make them a 90 won team. Then they bombed in April. Anyone who falls for their smokescreen deserves to pay for 10 dollar beers and listen to Fleenor for the rest of their life
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited January 2014

    dhdawg said:

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
    Exactly. They've hyped rally fries and kiddie nonsense for a long time, probably getting back to the late 90s, but back then they were actually winning and making the playoffs. At this pt. even some of the Marineroogs? can see they only care about profit. I fell for the b******* in the 2009-2010 offseason. They were coming off of a winning year and the FA acquisitions were supposed to make them a 90 won team. Then they bombed in April. Anyone who falls for their smokescreen deserves to pay for 10 dollar beers and listen to Fleenor for the rest of their life
    I thought they had reached an alltime low but I saw the other day they're doing Macklemore bobble head night. I'm a baseball fan, it was my first passion as a kid when it came to sports. I try to support them but they make it really tough
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    edited January 2014
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    Mariners ownership doesn't want a winning team because it breeds classless, thuggish fans that will just cause problems at games. A good family atmosphere is much better than winning.

    I know that's sarcasm but they legitimately care more about the ballpark experience than winning ball games
    Exactly. They've hyped rally fries and kiddie nonsense for a long time, probably getting back to the late 90s, but back then they were actually winning and making the playoffs. At this pt. even some of the Marineroogs? can see they only care about profit. I fell for the b******* in the 2009-2010 offseason. They were coming off of a winning year and the FA acquisitions were supposed to make them a 90 won team. Then they bombed in April. Anyone who falls for their smokescreen deserves to pay for 10 dollar beers and listen to Fleenor for the rest of their life
    I thought they had reached an alltime low but I saw the other day they're doing Macklemore bobble head night. I'm a baseball fan, it was my first passion as a kid when it came to sports. I try to support them but they make it really tough
    This is a joke right? Macklemore bobblehead?

    tell me this is a joke?
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I had to see it to believe it. A macklemore bobble head night

    thats worse than desperation. Im embarrassed to be a fan
  • dhdawg said:

    it doesn't look like they're going to make any more moves. So the lineup is probably going to be
    1. Miller SS
    2. Seager 3B
    3. Cano 2B
    4. Hart DH
    decent 1-2-3-4
    then the fucking dreckfest begins
    5. Morrison LF
    6. Smoak 1B (this loser should've been gone 2 years ago)
    7. Zunino C
    8. Ackley CF
    9. Romero RF

    SP:
    Hernandez
    Iwakuma
    Walker
    Paxton
    #5 will be the only move they make
    Rotation isn't horrible

    Bullpen is awful, not one player in the pen isn't making limited salary, could've easily signed a Downs, or a Boone Logan, or a Balfour for barely over 5 million.

    the best I can see is 78-86

    Great 164 game season as always.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    it doesn't look like they're going to make any more moves. So the lineup is probably going to be
    1. Miller SS
    2. Seager 3B
    3. Cano 2B
    4. Hart DH
    decent 1-2-3-4
    then the fucking dreckfest begins
    5. Morrison LF
    6. Smoak 1B (this loser should've been gone 2 years ago)
    7. Zunino C
    8. Ackley CF
    9. Romero RF

    SP:
    Hernandez
    Iwakuma
    Walker
    Paxton
    #5 will be the only move they make
    Rotation isn't horrible

    Bullpen is awful, not one player in the pen isn't making limited salary, could've easily signed a Downs, or a Boone Logan, or a Balfour for barely over 5 million.

    the best I can see is 78-86

    Great 164 game season as always.
    Shit. 78-84
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    1) It's popular to rip on Bavasi's signings of Sexson and Beltre. Sexson was fine for his first 2 years. Beltre is a potential future HOFer depending on how the rest of his career plays out. Many made Beltre the poster child for Mariner failures instead of realizing that there wasn't anything around him and as a result he pressed trying to do too much. We asked him to hit 3rd and 4th when he's a 5th or 6th hitter.

    2) I like the moves to get Hart and Morrison this offseason. Problem is that you are foolish to have expectations for them without solid backup plans given their injury histories. We don't have backup plans. Smoak isn't part of the solution.

    3) I have a feeling that Ackley will have a breakout year this year.

    4) They really need to move Nick Franklin into something useful.

    5) Other than the fact that with Walker and Paxton in the rotation you are going to watch their innings, the rotation is looking to be a solid strength that should keep you in games (particularly if they would invest in going after a solid #3 that takes the pressure off of Walker and Paxton ... but that would be fucking smart and not FS

    6) In today's game of baseball, you are a fucking idiot as a GM if you don't invest in a solid bullpen ... it's often the difference between good teams and bad teams.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    franklin will probably be moved before the season begins, I just can't see a stop for him.
    Ackley could break out, but he just isn't an OFer.

    There is not one OF out of Gutierrez, Saunders, Morrison, Hart, Ackley, and Almonte that can start on a playoff caliber team, not one.

    The bullpen is garbage, I repeat they are paying minimum salary to every single member, look at what having a good bullpen did for the pirates last year.

    Jack Z has been advertised as some scouting genius, but the only draft pick that has actually proved he can produce at a ML level is Seager, so his drafting is probably average.

    He can't make a trade to save his life, and his FA signings have been a disaster
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    In today's game, a good rotation + a strong bullpen makes up for a mediocre offense ... particularly if you are pitching in a pitchers park like Safeco.

    You'd think that what Tampa and Oakland do is fucking rocket science.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Tequilla said:

    In today's game, a good rotation + a strong bullpen makes up for a mediocre offense ... particularly if you are pitching in a pitchers park like Safeco.

    You'd think that what Tampa and Oakland do is fucking rocket science.

    You need at least a mediocre offense, not a historically bad one. Not to mention, the Mariners rotation isn't as good as either of those teams, and their bullpen is a disaster compared to theirs.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    1) It's popular to rip on Bavasi's signings of Sexson and Beltre. Sexson was fine for his first 2 years. Beltre is a potential future HOFer depending on how the rest of his career plays out.

    I stopped reading here.

    TequillaFS
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited January 2014

    Tequilla said:

    1) It's popular to rip on Bavasi's signings of Sexson and Beltre. Sexson was fine for his first 2 years. Beltre is a potential future HOFer depending on how the rest of his career plays out.

    I stopped reading here.

    TequillaFS
    I almost did too but I went and looked at Beltre's stats again. He had a pretty good average WAR in his 5 years with the M's and has 376 HR's at age 34. He could be a HOF based on stats but I don't think the BBWAA would elect him because of steroid rumors.

    Sexson....uhhhh. No. Not good at all.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    I'm assuming at this point that Beltre was another Biogenesis client that got away with it.

    His sudden resurgence with a known doping team speaks volumes.
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Beltre's case is dependent on his being one of the best defensive third basemen in the history of the game. It's unlikely that he'd be elected, but not unbelievable.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Beltre's case is dependent on his being one of the best defensive third basemen in the history of the game. It's unlikely that he'd be elected, but not unbelievable.

    You would also have to ignore the significant statistical evidence that suggests that he's a juicer.
Sign In or Register to comment.