Ginsberg Sells the Couch


Comments
-
Driving, i5, hooker, blow
-
She’s been dead for months. Now was time to pull the plug. September Surprise!
I feel bad for her family. They had to watch her dragged to the couch selling for three years now.
Ted Cruz for SCOTUS! -
This just made the election really interesting... but who does Trump Nominate now?
-
Not really. There are 4 months left in the year. Trump’s term doesn’t stop on election night, neither does the Senate majority.Goduckies said:This just made the election really interesting... but who does Trump Nominate now?
-
The Supreme Court is clearly a vestige of white supremacy, like the electoral college. Now’s the perfect time to just get rid of them.
-
Who thinks the R's will do the same as the last one heading into an election and wait till after the election? or not?
either way will be interesting... -
-
Guess we will find out if the GOP has learned to play the game like Trump or if they will fag out and be their normal giant vaginas.
Easy 10 pays 1 odds on the GOP being pussies. -
-
Huh? This is the same GOP that finessed a nine-month stonewall of Garland. They have more than enough senators to get someone in by 2021. Only David Shaw could fuck up this lead.Houhusky said:Guess we will find out if the GOP has learned to play the game like Trump or if they will fag out and be their normal giant vaginas.
Easy 10 pays 1 odds on the GOP being pussies. -
This is of very little relevance, as the The United Nations is the real Supreme Court.
-
Millions of fetuses are screaming in glee
-
I want to see how Schumer turns on Harry Reid's memory and change on the filibuster rule for this next nominee
Schumer is such an asshole, but then most Senators are... -
Trump needs to appoint tomorrow. They've propped her up for years to prevent him getting to appoint.
-
Really doesn't matter. If Slo Joe wins and the dems take the Senate then the Court goes to 12 Justices and three commies get nominated and bye bye free speech and gun rights.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
This is of very little relevance, as the The United Nations is the real Supreme Court.
-
Excellent
-
Trump will get a judge in, liberals will cry, and then he'll win the election anyway.
-
Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
Get Joe to tip his hand on a replacement, he’s bound to piss off a wing of his crazy party.
-
-
-
We?NorthwestFresh said:Not classy from CNN.
-
-
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
Really? The dems trying to steal an election in Florida in 2000? Stealing an election in 1960 in Illinois? Using the CIA, FBI, DOJ and the US House of Representatives to unseat a President? Are you 6 months old?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
-
2000 was litigated, the process worked.WestlinnDuck said:
Really? The dems trying to steal an election in Florida in 2000? Stealing an election in 1960 in Illinois? Using the CIA, FBI, DOJ and the US House of Representatives to unseat a President? Are you 6 months old?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
No idea what this Illinois thing is.
Wash your hands old timmer.