Numbers, math, facts, etc.
Comments
-
Cordwood
-
Pics or GTFOHHusky said:Cordwood
-
-
People like H still trying to peddle fear with cases are simply pathetic at this point
-
This Chart(tm) is really important to understanding what is going on with the death data...GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm not smart enough to understand this. But I'm assuming it's... grim.LesGrossman said:According to this guy’s data, 64% of the deaths reported for this week’s total were actually from before May 9...
I mean, I get that there’s some lag in reporting, but recording over 1,000 deaths for two straight weeks when the deaths actually occurred 9-10 weeks ago?
If they were being honest, the media would report on “date of death” instead of how many the CDC added to the total that week, if they’re adding data like this.
If you are having trouble understanding the TLDR of the chart here is a kind of "heat map" that highlights the data laundering that is occurring.
Even more explanation for the specials with social workers: There is a difference between actual date of death and the date the death is reported. The media and dumbfucks talking about a recent spike in deaths this week are doing so by using the newly reported deaths that occurred over 2 months ago in April and incorrectly applying them to this week. Over half of the deaths reported for the week ending on July 11th occurred before May 2nd.
@GrundleStiltzkin @LesGrossman
-
-
For those that think this is an honest mistake. Sweden, the definition of grim, processes and reports 95% of deaths within 2 weeks.Houhusky said:
This Chart(tm) is really important to understanding what is going on with the death data...GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm not smart enough to understand this. But I'm assuming it's... grim.LesGrossman said:According to this guy’s data, 64% of the deaths reported for this week’s total were actually from before May 9...
I mean, I get that there’s some lag in reporting, but recording over 1,000 deaths for two straight weeks when the deaths actually occurred 9-10 weeks ago?
If they were being honest, the media would report on “date of death” instead of how many the CDC added to the total that week, if they’re adding data like this.
If you are having trouble understanding the TLDR of the chart here is a kind of "heat map" that highlights the data laundering that is occurring.
Even more explanation for the specials with social workers: There is a difference between actual date of death and the date the death is reported. The media and dumbfucks talking about a recent spike in deaths this week are doing so by using the newly reported deaths that occurred over 2 months ago in April and incorrectly applying them to this week. Over half of the deaths reported for the week ending on July 11th occurred before May 2nd.
@GrundleStiltzkin @LesGrossman
-
This paper from the Swedish government says that not only is open schools not an increased risk to children, but also not an increased risk (vs. any other profession) to teachers. It compared Sweden to Finland (who had closed schools).
But Mean Orange Man says schools should open, so right on cue LA, San Diego, and San Bernardino announce that they are going to be distance learning in the fall.Swedish Paper said:
Summary
This report is a comparison between Finland and Sweden, two in many ways similar countries who applied different measures regarding schools during the covid-19 pandemic. There is no difference in the overall incidence of the laboratory confirmed covid-19 cases in the age group 1-19 years in the two countries and the number of laboratory confirmed cases does not fluctuate with school closure or change in testing policy in Finland. In Sweden, the number of laboratory confirmed cases is affected by change in testing policy. Severe covid-19 disease as measured in ICU admittance is very rare in both countries in this age group and no deaths were reported. Outbreak investigations in Finland has not shown children to be contributing much in terms of transmission and in Sweden a report comparing risk of covid-19 in different professions, showed no increased risk for teachers.
In conclusion, closure or not of schools had no measurable direct impact on the number of laboratory confirmed cases in school-aged children in Finland or Sweden. The negative effects of closing schools must be weighed against the positive indirect effects it might have on the mitigation of the covid-19 pandemic.
Link:
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material/publikationsarkiv/c/covid-19-in-schoolchildren/
