Numbers, math, facts, etc.
Comments
-
HurtfulPurpleThrobber said:
You'd need to DM me tit pics, too.ThomasFremont said:
You’re just saying that to be nice.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, maybe after some Bushmills and edibles.....ThomasFremont said:
HurtfulPurpleThrobber said:
Well, that 'we' may be taken a little too literally. None of you are really my type.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Shit.PurpleThrobber said:
For supposed doctors, these motherfuckers are idiots.GrundleStiltzkin said:I was right. But not as right as I’d thought.
The solution to build antibodies is to keep people locked up. Genius.
We? should all be having sex with one another and exchanging body fluids in the name of saving humanity.
Later, guysm
No fetters moobs allowed. -
According to this guy’s data, 64% of the deaths reported for this week’s total were actually from before May 9...
I mean, I get that there’s some lag in reporting, but recording over 1,000 deaths for two straight weeks when the deaths actually occurred 9-10 weeks ago?
If they were being honest, the media would report on “date of death” instead of how many the CDC added to the total that week, if they’re adding data like this.
-
I'm not smart enough to understand this. But I'm assuming it's... grim.LesGrossman said:According to this guy’s data, 64% of the deaths reported for this week’s total were actually from before May 9...
I mean, I get that there’s some lag in reporting, but recording over 1,000 deaths for two straight weeks when the deaths actually occurred 9-10 weeks ago?
If they were being honest, the media would report on “date of death” instead of how many the CDC added to the total that week, if they’re adding data like this. -
Here’s his explanation.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm not smart enough to understand this. But I'm assuming it's... grim.LesGrossman said:According to this guy’s data, 64% of the deaths reported for this week’s total were actually from before May 9...
I mean, I get that there’s some lag in reporting, but recording over 1,000 deaths for two straight weeks when the deaths actually occurred 9-10 weeks ago?
If they were being honest, the media would report on “date of death” instead of how many the CDC added to the total that week, if they’re adding data like this.
This data is saying that 1,235 of the deaths that they added this week actually occurred the week of May 9, 1,056 of the deaths that they added this week actually occurred the week of May 2, etc.
Also, this is the first week that they’ve had this big of addition this far out from the date of death. He’s saying they are padding the numbers to make it look like it’s increasing now, when in reality these aren’t really deaths that happened this week.
-
Ethicalskeptic was saying the CDC has 35-50k unexpected deaths this year that they can play with. It seems they’re now getting dumped into the counter to bump up the graphs.
-
Media will be keepin’ it alive til NovmberLoneStarDawg said:Ethicalskeptic was saying the CDC has 35-50k unexpected deaths this year that they can play with. It seems they’re now getting dumped into the counter to bump up the graphs.
-
Looks like upside down stacks of cordwood.
-
Date of death “Involving Covid” numbers are in the second column. The number for the last couple weeks will be adjusted higher, but this is not an increasing trend. -
