Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Eastside Catholic stuff

1234689

Comments

  • Options
    CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,151
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    edited April 2020
    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    Plot twist: Petersen was driving the truck and was jealous.
  • Options
    biak1biak1 Member Posts: 3,989
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Just poast screenshots of the twats, they're all getting deleted...
  • Options
    BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    It might have played a small part. There were bigger concerns with him. His committable offers reflect the same.
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
  • Options
    FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
    Dude I like his tape
  • Options
    FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,708
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    FireCohen said:

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
    Dude I like his tape
    He hit the hole hard. Stayed up after contact. Good endurance. Didn't show a lot of versatility or ball skills.
  • Options
    chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,621
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    biak1 said:

    Just poast screenshots of the twats, they're all getting deleted...

    I think you can only post twat screenshots in the wam.
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    NEsnake12 said:

    FireCohen said:

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
    Dude I like his tape
    He hit the hole hard. Stayed up after contact. Good endurance. Didn't show a lot of versatility or ball skills.
    Are we talking Hudl or Snapchat?
    Look what you have created Derek
  • Options
    FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes
    NEsnake12 said:

    FireCohen said:

    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
    I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
    Dude I like his tape
    He hit the hole hard. Stayed up after contact. Good endurance. Didn't show a lot of versatility or ball skills.
    Are we talking Hudl or Snapchat?
    someone got it :)
  • Options
    FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,708
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Beno4Life said:
    Going back to this I can’t square the sentence about three current students with scholarships to prestigious universities with the other statement put out by King5.
  • Options
    DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    It's all bullshit until we hear it from KOMO4!!1!

    I el.oh.el'd at the thought of the stranger winning the pulitzer prize for their piece sandwiched between ad coupons for Lusty Lady and free trials for phone sex hotline.

    It really is low hanging fruit though (obv not an actual pulitzer) for a big dick reporter who wants to use that rag as a stepping stone, if such person actually exists.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,861
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes





    Six pages on Eastside Catholic....and not a single pic of sluts in school uniforms.

    Sad.

    Sidebar: The Throbber lost his virginity to a Catholic school girl. Unfortunately, no schoolgirl uniform or that may have really perverted me permanently.

  • Options
    FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,708
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    Beno4Life said:
    * Police recommended charges. Two people to be charged with rape, one with rape of a child (he was 18, victim was 16, in Washington 17 is the age of consent) also knew that child porn was filmed and distributed.

    * Clyde Hill police couldn't get the video because it was Snapchat. Went to the cyber people at Bellevue police, who also couldn't get it.

    * DA's office chose not to press charges. Because this is one of the hardest cases to prove and DAs hate to ruin their stats. Maybe more to this.

    * The person filming the video was one of two people in the cab of the truck, and was allegedly an Eastside Catholic football player. Out of the two people in the cab only one was an Eastside Catholic player. We now know who that was.

    QUESTIONS:

    * How could they have not recovered the video? If CP distribution was involved, why did they not contact the FBI or someone more qualified than the Bellevue PD? Also, if other people saw the video including the kid they interviewed, that is no longer hearsay.

    * Why wasn't the 18 year old charged, at least with statutory?

    * The three football players who signed with "prestigious universities" - who could that be? We know 1/3. We're also told its not Ohio State. Where else have Eastside players signed from the 2019 or 2020 classes, prestigious school or not? That I was able to find, including walk-ons: Cal, Washington, Portland State 2x, Idaho State, UCLA 2x, Western Oregon, Air Force. I looked up walk-ons as well since I'm guessing the writer may not be familiar with the intricacies of teen boy stalking.

    It is good that the police actually investigated and recommended charges, but I'm getting a bit of a Keystone Cops vibe. And a DA who didn't want to file charges, citing lack of evidence that would make them have to work.
    2020:

    Stanford, Cal, OSU, UW and PSU (x2)

    2019 doesn't count since the article specifically states all three are still attending EC.

    Where did you see that the person filming was in the truck? That was my initial assumption but given that Hector is specifically stated to be a witness I came around to thinking it must have been one of the guys in the truck bed doing the raping.
  • Options
    RatherBeBrewingRatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes

    Beno4Life said:
    * Police recommended charges. Two people to be charged with rape, one with rape of a child (he was 18, victim was 16, in Washington 17 is the age of consent) also knew that child porn was filmed and distributed.

    * Clyde Hill police couldn't get the video because it was Snapchat. Went to the cyber people at Bellevue police, who also couldn't get it.

    * DA's office chose not to press charges. Because this is one of the hardest cases to prove and DAs hate to ruin their stats. Maybe more to this.

    * The person filming the video was one of two people in the cab of the truck, and was allegedly an Eastside Catholic football player. Out of the two people in the cab only one was an Eastside Catholic player. We now know who that was.

    QUESTIONS:

    * How could they have not recovered the video? If CP distribution was involved, why did they not contact the FBI or someone more qualified than the Bellevue PD? Also, if other people saw the video including the kid they interviewed, that is no longer hearsay.

    * Why wasn't the 18 year old charged, at least with statutory?

    * The three football players who signed with "prestigious universities" - who could that be? We know 1/3. We're also told its not Ohio State. Where else have Eastside players signed from the 2019 or 2020 classes, prestigious school or not? That I was able to find, including walk-ons: Cal, Washington, Portland State 2x, Idaho State, UCLA 2x, Western Oregon, Air Force. I looked up walk-ons as well since I'm guessing the writer may not be familiar with the intricacies of teen boy stalking.

    It is good that the police actually investigated and recommended charges, but I'm getting a bit of a Keystone Cops vibe. And a DA who didn't want to file charges, citing lack of evidence that would make them have to work.
    2020:

    Stanford, Cal, OSU, UW and PSU (x2)

    2019 doesn't count since the article specifically states all three are still attending EC.

    Where did you see that the person filming was in the truck? That was my initial assumption but given that Hector is specifically stated to be a witness I came around to thinking it must have been one of the guys in the truck bed doing the raping.
    I missed the part where it said all three were still students at EC in 2019, but you're right. It's still a bit opaque to me if that includes the witness in the cab.

    "The Eastside Catholic players remained on the team and went on to win another state championship title in 2019. The three males who still attend the school also obtained scholarships to play football at prestigious universities."

    "Two other teenagers, including another Eastside Catholic standout player, watched from inside the cab."

    "Police heard another version of the story from the two witnesses inside the truck’s cab. According to documents, the witness who attends Eastside Catholic said the teenage girl was a willing participant and “the initiator.” The second witness inside the truck was an athlete from another high school in the Bellevue area."

    So we had two people inside the cab. In the part of the police report the Palo Alto Daily Post released it was said by those who saw the video who was filming and doing the asking but not clear if it was the same person doing both. That same person is also the one from the cab who submitted a 9 page statement from his attorney and was given limited immunity. I would assume the limited immunity was in relation to the assault and not the CP.

    From the PA Post:

    "“(Redacted) and Ayden were filming the incident and asked the girl if she ‘was ok/was having fun,’” reads that student’s statement. She said the video was sent to a football groupchat and many of her friends had seen it."

    Archived version of that article, which has some minor inconsistencies compared to the KING5 report: http://archive.li/S3v2d
Sign In or Register to comment.