Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Eastside Catholic stuff

1235789

Comments

  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,237
    edited April 2020
    yeah, but why didn't we offer gee jr earlier? and gee sr an "assistant" gig?
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,837
    Tail end of story said why KING5 sat on the story

    I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup
  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,237
    Tequilla said:

    Tail end of story said why KING5 sat on the story

    I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup

    it probably can ... nothing is ever "lost" in today's electronic world ... it's more like "what pressure do you need in order to make it happen" to get that video recovered.

    What's the political or legal will?
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    dnc said:

    Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
    Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.

    Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.

    And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
    It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.

    Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    dnc said:

    Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
    Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.

    Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.

    And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
    It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.

    Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
    Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,459 Founders Club
    Guys this doesn't get off season natty votes. Keep our eye on the ball
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,459 Founders Club
    Or EXONERATED

    but well done
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031

    Or EXONERATED

    but well done

    Mission Accomplished?
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    dnc said:

    Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
    Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.

    Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.

    And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
    It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.

    Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
    Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.
    Ohh he is guilty.............of having a douche bag father w/respect
  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,237
    I think Hector's mom is a lawyer.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    animate said:

    I think Hector's mom is a lawyer.

    this story is starting to sound exactly like John Grisham's The Associate.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    King5 story facts:

    -All four participants in the sex act remained on the team in 2018
    -One was 18 at the time of the act
    -Three still attend EC
    -All three who still attend the school received scholarships to play football at "prestigious" universities

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,798

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW's recruiting tells us who they believed to be involved not who was actually involved.
  • jhfstyle24jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    TTJ said:

    Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)

    How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
    UW did not pursue:
    Ayden Hector
    Gee Scott
    DJ Rogers

    UW did pursue:
    Sam Adams

    Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
Sign In or Register to comment.