Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.
I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup
it probably can ... nothing is ever "lost" in today's electronic world ... it's more like "what pressure do you need in order to make it happen" to get that video recovered.
Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.
Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.
And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.
Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.
And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.
Unfortunately you can't really trust anything that's out there right now. I wouldn't be surprised if King5 pulls their part 2 of the story out of fear.
The parents/families are in full "Deny everything and threaten to sue" mode. Their asses are now against the wall now that this is out there. If I'm their lawyer, it's hail mary time. I'm telling them to get on social media, deny everything, and claim victimhood while we threaten to sue everyone who talks about this. Maybe we can scare people and muddy the waters enough that the lid gets clamped back on the bottle. Hector's camp has already changed their "media approach" like 3 times. The latest I'm seeing is that he had no involvement and didnt actual get kicked out of Stanford but instead decided he wanted to stay home and play for UW, which doesnt add up to anything else that's out there.
Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...odd
Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.
Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.
And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.
Ohh he is guilty.............of having a douche bag father w/respect
-All four participants in the sex act remained on the team in 2018 -One was 18 at the time of the act -Three still attend EC -All three who still attend the school received scholarships to play football at "prestigious" universities
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
UW's recruiting tells us who they believed to be involved not who was actually involved.
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
UW did not pursue: Ayden Hector Gee Scott DJ Rogers
UW did pursue: Sam Adams
Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
Comments
This, then poof. Just gone.
I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup
What's the political or legal will?
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy.
but well done
The parents/families are in full "Deny everything and threaten to sue" mode. Their asses are now against the wall now that this is out there. If I'm their lawyer, it's hail mary time. I'm telling them to get on social media, deny everything, and claim victimhood while we threaten to sue everyone who talks about this. Maybe we can scare people and muddy the waters enough that the lid gets clamped back on the bottle. Hector's camp has already changed their "media approach" like 3 times. The latest I'm seeing is that he had no involvement and didnt actual get kicked out of Stanford but instead decided he wanted to stay home and play for UW, which doesnt add up to anything else that's out there.
-All four participants in the sex act remained on the team in 2018
-One was 18 at the time of the act
-Three still attend EC
-All three who still attend the school received scholarships to play football at "prestigious" universities
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
Ayden Hector
Gee Scott
DJ Rogers
UW did pursue:
Sam Adams
Pete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.