Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Eastside Catholic stuff
Comments
-
yeah, but why didn't we offer gee jr earlier? and gee sr an "assistant" gig?
-
Baseman said:
Right or wrong, CFB should prepare his anus and his wallet. Defending a defamation suit is no joke. Naming names -- minors' names -- under investigation, but not charged, is playing with fire. Plaintiff's attorneys have ways of discovering alt identities.insinceredawg said:
Buckle up. Either way, it will be interesting.
(not saying the kids will win. Don't twist.)
This, then poof. Just gone. -
Tail end of story said why KING5 sat on the story
I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup -
it probably can ... nothing is ever "lost" in today's electronic world ... it's more like "what pressure do you need in order to make it happen" to get that video recovered.Tequilla said:Tail end of story said why KING5 sat on the story
I also say it’s super fishy that those videos can’t be re-discovered ... computer forensics can be pretty damning and this should be a layup
What's the political or legal will? -
Somewhere, someone has all the gifs they need
-
It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.dnc said:
Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.bananasnblondes said:
Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...oddhuskyhooligan said:
Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.
And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy. -
Gee Sr is a douchebag, but the lust for blood, especially when they are saying Gee Jr wasn’t involved is pretty pathetic.GreenRiverGatorz said:
It doesn't seem odd to me. King 5 had access to all the police reports, and given that it's been widely assumed that Gee was one of the "three football players who received scholarships from prestigious universities", the disclaimer seems pretty necessary. As big of a boob Gee Sr. is, he should absolutely try to clear his son's name.dnc said:
Yep just said the same thing in the Wam.bananasnblondes said:
Why did King5 make an editor's note clarifying that one random kid wasnt involved. That seems...oddhuskyhooligan said:
Something really weird about exonerating one and only one individual.
And the wording is funny too. The police reports explicitly state Scott wasn’t involved? That seems extremely unlikely.
Now the question is who is that third player? Hopefully not our guy. -
Guys this doesn't get off season natty votes. Keep our eye on the ball
-
-
Or EXONERATED
but well done
