A simple question
Comments
-
I've always been on team Tommy Freemont, but I have to agree with the others here. AOC represents a variety of radical that I find dangerous to the American way, which I believe has been defined in large measure by free market principles and philosophy. Private property, capital investment, the fruits thereof and all that.ThomasFremont said:
“Wants to destroy this country”WestlinnDuck said:Depends on what things you want. And what problems you recognize. AOC wants bad things and her recognized problems are my opportunities which makes her a bad person and anti-American. Now here is how a real debate occurs. You now talk about her nude green eel and how patriotic that is. Then you talk about about how my free speech and 2A rights are a problem and how wanting to take them away is patriotic. AOC isn't existing in some theoretical background. She is an elected member of Congress and wants to destroy this country.
An auspicious start to our REAL debate.
She represents a school of thought that truly believes we all deserve an equal result, which flies in the face of how we got here. I'll go down swinging on that point. My family knows all too well how things work when someone swoops in and starts pointing the finger at people who have "more than they need." AOC is clearly a socialist, and likely a full blown communist if you got her drunk enough to admit it. One party rule, re-distribute the wealth.
I can't abide by that. The Creep family has been to that movie. We? know how it ends. -
There is nothing hypothetical about the Democrat Socialists. They have told everyone want they want to do.ThomasFremont said:Yeah and I’d fuck Natalie Portman if I could, but that ain’t happening either.
Hypothetical BS is the name of the game today I see.
We don’t do that, fellas.
Their solutions will do nothing to help.
-
There is nothing hypothetical about my wanting to bang Natalie Portman. I’ve told everyone what I want to do.RaceBannon said:
There is nothing hypothetical about the Democrat Socialists. They have told everyone want they want to do.ThomasFremont said:Yeah and I’d fuck Natalie Portman if I could, but that ain’t happening either.
Hypothetical BS is the name of the game today I see.
We don’t do that, fellas.
Their solutions will do nothing to help.
My solutions will do nothing to help. -
Hell yeah. Portman in the movie Closer, is unforgettable.ThomasFremont said:Yeah and I’d fuck Natalie Portman if I could, but that ain’t happening either.
Hypothetical BS is the name of the game today I see.
We don’t do that, fellas. -
Obama was the first president who truly hated America and all it stands forcreepycoug said:
Fair enough. And there a lot of them who are there for other reasons that similarly have little or nothing to do with merit. Rubio and others like him are there because of their ethnic and racial background insofar as that is relevant to their constituency. Rubio would likely not be a senator if he hailed from Spokane. But he doesn't; he's from a place with a lot of Cubans.Bendintheriver said:
You are absolutely correct. Neither would BO had he not been black. I know hard core Reps who voted only for him because he was black. They wanted to say they voted for the first black President. His racism was ignored, his total lack of experience. Like many predicted of a Chicago rat being President he was also the most corrupt ever.GrundleStiltzkin said:
She would not have risen to the position she #Occupies within the party if she was a white bartender.Southerndawg said:
Agree with Derek.DerekJohnson said:
I agree with much of what you're saying. But out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to say "minority bartender" instead of just saying "bartender"? It seems to imply her rhetoric would be more palatable had she been a white bartender.Bendintheriver said:Can someone, anyone, describe a positive that is spewed by the rat candidates for President? One positive comment about our country, the people in it or the opportunity for all. Half of them are multi millionaires and the other half aren't and are still on that stage running for President yet none of them have any hint of a positive message.
In my lifetime, after researching and ghosting speeches for some politicians, working in DC, working on some campaigns, I have never, ever, seen politicians who actually believe that this country is so evil that they can't be seen saying anything positive about it. There is no pride on that stage, only victim-hood and financial envy. I get it, they are dividing the races, convincing people they are victims, and creating economic envy so that they can polarize and get that sides votes. But the damage the are doing is a lasting one and it seems that they sincerely want to fundamentally change the entire history of this country and what has made it great.
There is nothing more difficult to watch than a minority bar tender, who isn't that bright, lecturing all of us about how there is no opportunity when she is a member of congress. Or watching a rebuttal after the State of the Union by a Governor, who is clearly out of touch, talk about minority children filling in pot holes to help the government of all things. But worst of all, it is those running for President and their clear lack of appreciation for what our country has done and can offer.
Can anyone detail some positives or is this just me?
I can name 20 other minorities and some whitey's that are in congress that are only there because of their skin color. It is actually a good thing for the country. As much as a pain in the ass some idiots are that are in Congress, they have the opportunity to be there representing their constituents. You can't say that anywhere else in the world.
Then again, as I write that, I'm reminded that my former law school classmate and friend, Raul Labrador, was a Congressman representing his district in Idaho. I don't think the fact that he's Puerto Rican had shit to do with his election ... Raul is a very conservative Mormon married to a white Mormon woman and meets the criteria for election in Idaho.
In a perverse way, AOC won election to the House on the Trump ticket - the outsider's outsider. She was just supported by a different base with a different agenda.
I suppose all that is to say that the country is working in the way it was intended.
As to BO's lack of experience, he's hardly the first, so it shouldn't be held against him any more than it has against others. -
You'll think differently at the reeducation camp comrade!RaceBannon said:
There is nothing hypothetical about the Democrat Socialists. They have told everyone want they want to do.ThomasFremont said:Yeah and I’d fuck Natalie Portman if I could, but that ain’t happening either.
Hypothetical BS is the name of the game today I see.
We don’t do that, fellas.
Their solutions will do nothing to help. -
Tommy will happily vote for Bernie - the commie. Nothing hypothetical about that.
-
Damn, bruh. T&Ps.creepycoug said:
Fair enough. And there a lot of them who are there for other reasons that similarly have little or nothing to do with merit. Rubio and others like him are there because of their ethnic and racial background insofar as that is relevant to their constituency. Rubio would likely not be a senator if he hailed from Spokane. But he doesn't; he's from a place with a lot of Cubans.Bendintheriver said:
You are absolutely correct. Neither would BO had he not been black. I know hard core Reps who voted only for him because he was black. They wanted to say they voted for the first black President. His racism was ignored, his total lack of experience. Like many predicted of a Chicago rat being President he was also the most corrupt ever.GrundleStiltzkin said:
She would not have risen to the position she #Occupies within the party if she was a white bartender.Southerndawg said:
Agree with Derek.DerekJohnson said:
I agree with much of what you're saying. But out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to say "minority bartender" instead of just saying "bartender"? It seems to imply her rhetoric would be more palatable had she been a white bartender.Bendintheriver said:Can someone, anyone, describe a positive that is spewed by the rat candidates for President? One positive comment about our country, the people in it or the opportunity for all. Half of them are multi millionaires and the other half aren't and are still on that stage running for President yet none of them have any hint of a positive message.
In my lifetime, after researching and ghosting speeches for some politicians, working in DC, working on some campaigns, I have never, ever, seen politicians who actually believe that this country is so evil that they can't be seen saying anything positive about it. There is no pride on that stage, only victim-hood and financial envy. I get it, they are dividing the races, convincing people they are victims, and creating economic envy so that they can polarize and get that sides votes. But the damage the are doing is a lasting one and it seems that they sincerely want to fundamentally change the entire history of this country and what has made it great.
There is nothing more difficult to watch than a minority bar tender, who isn't that bright, lecturing all of us about how there is no opportunity when she is a member of congress. Or watching a rebuttal after the State of the Union by a Governor, who is clearly out of touch, talk about minority children filling in pot holes to help the government of all things. But worst of all, it is those running for President and their clear lack of appreciation for what our country has done and can offer.
Can anyone detail some positives or is this just me?
I can name 20 other minorities and some whitey's that are in congress that are only there because of their skin color. It is actually a good thing for the country. As much as a pain in the ass some idiots are that are in Congress, they have the opportunity to be there representing their constituents. You can't say that anywhere else in the world.
Then again, as I write that, I'm reminded that my former law school classmate and friend, Raul Labrador, was a Congressman representing his district in Idaho. I don't think the fact that he's Puerto Rican had shit to do with his election ... Raul is a very conservative Mormon married to a white Mormon woman and meets the criteria for election in Idaho.
In a perverse way, AOC won election to the House on the Trump ticket - the outsider's outsider. She was just supported by a different base with a different agenda.
I suppose all that is to say that the country is working in the way it was intended.
As to BO's lack of experience, he's hardly the first, so it shouldn't be held against him any more than it has against others.
SLC/Utah Moes are radical progressives compared to the S. Idaho Mormons.
There's a boatload of hispanics (some who are even here legally) in Ada/Canyon County too - Raul checks many boxes.
-
Because they will fail I guess. Not quite following the "logic" hereWestlinnDuck said:Tommy will happily vote for Bernie - the commie. Nothing hypothetical about that.
Obviously he's embarrassed by the Squad but won't admit they have infected the host @dnc -
