A simple question

creepycoug

PurpleThrobber said:

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Southerndawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

Bendintheriver said:

Can someone, anyone, describe a positive that is spewed by the rat candidates for President? One positive comment about our country, the people in it or the opportunity for all. Half of them are multi millionaires and the other half aren't and are still on that stage running for President yet none of them have any hint of a positive message.

In my lifetime, after researching and ghosting speeches for some politicians, working in DC, working on some campaigns, I have never, ever, seen politicians who actually believe that this country is so evil that they can't be seen saying anything positive about it. There is no pride on that stage, only victim-hood and financial envy. I get it, they are dividing the races, convincing people they are victims, and creating economic envy so that they can polarize and get that sides votes. But the damage the are doing is a lasting one and it seems that they sincerely want to fundamentally change the entire history of this country and what has made it great.

There is nothing more difficult to watch than a minority bar tender, who isn't that bright, lecturing all of us about how there is no opportunity when she is a member of congress. Or watching a rebuttal after the State of the Union by a Governor, who is clearly out of touch, talk about minority children filling in pot holes to help the government of all things. But worst of all, it is those running for President and their clear lack of appreciation for what our country has done and can offer.

Can anyone detail some positives or is this just me?

I agree with much of what you're saying. But out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to say "minority bartender" instead of just saying "bartender"? It seems to imply her rhetoric would be more palatable had she been a white bartender.

Agree with Derek.

She would not have risen to the position she #Occupies within the party if she was a white bartender.

You are absolutely correct. Neither would BO had he not been black. I know hard core Reps who voted only for him because he was black. They wanted to say they voted for the first black President. His racism was ignored, his total lack of experience. Like many predicted of a Chicago rat being President he was also the most corrupt ever.

I can name 20 other minorities and some whitey's that are in congress that are only there because of their skin color. It is actually a good thing for the country. As much as a pain in the ass some idiots are that are in Congress, they have the opportunity to be there representing their constituents. You can't say that anywhere else in the world.

Fair enough. And there a lot of them who are there for other reasons that similarly have little or nothing to do with merit. Rubio and others like him are there because of their ethnic and racial background insofar as that is relevant to their constituency. Rubio would likely not be a senator if he hailed from Spokane. But he doesn't; he's from a place with a lot of Cubans.

Then again, as I write that, I'm reminded that my former law school classmate and friend, Raul Labrador, was a Congressman representing his district in Idaho. I don't think the fact that he's Puerto Rican had shit to do with his election ... Raul is a very conservative Mormon married to a white Mormon woman and meets the criteria for election in Idaho.

In a perverse way, AOC won election to the House on the Trump ticket - the outsider's outsider. She was just supported by a different base with a different agenda.

I suppose all that is to say that the country is working in the way it was intended.

As to BO's lack of experience, he's hardly the first, so it shouldn't be held against him any more than it has against others.

Damn, bruh. T&Ps.

SLC/Utah Moes are radical progressives compared to the S. Idaho Mormons.

There's a boatload of hispanics (some who are even here legally) in Ada/Canyon County too - Raul checks many boxes.

Oh yeah. Raul is not a pretender. Trust me on that point. He's a true believer.

creepycoug

Bendintheriver said:

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Southerndawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

Bendintheriver said:

Can someone, anyone, describe a positive that is spewed by the rat candidates for President? One positive comment about our country, the people in it or the opportunity for all. Half of them are multi millionaires and the other half aren't and are still on that stage running for President yet none of them have any hint of a positive message.

In my lifetime, after researching and ghosting speeches for some politicians, working in DC, working on some campaigns, I have never, ever, seen politicians who actually believe that this country is so evil that they can't be seen saying anything positive about it. There is no pride on that stage, only victim-hood and financial envy. I get it, they are dividing the races, convincing people they are victims, and creating economic envy so that they can polarize and get that sides votes. But the damage the are doing is a lasting one and it seems that they sincerely want to fundamentally change the entire history of this country and what has made it great.

There is nothing more difficult to watch than a minority bar tender, who isn't that bright, lecturing all of us about how there is no opportunity when she is a member of congress. Or watching a rebuttal after the State of the Union by a Governor, who is clearly out of touch, talk about minority children filling in pot holes to help the government of all things. But worst of all, it is those running for President and their clear lack of appreciation for what our country has done and can offer.

Can anyone detail some positives or is this just me?

I agree with much of what you're saying. But out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to say "minority bartender" instead of just saying "bartender"? It seems to imply her rhetoric would be more palatable had she been a white bartender.

Agree with Derek.

She would not have risen to the position she #Occupies within the party if she was a white bartender.

You are absolutely correct. Neither would BO had he not been black. I know hard core Reps who voted only for him because he was black. They wanted to say they voted for the first black President. His racism was ignored, his total lack of experience. Like many predicted of a Chicago rat being President he was also the most corrupt ever.

I can name 20 other minorities and some whitey's that are in congress that are only there because of their skin color. It is actually a good thing for the country. As much as a pain in the ass some idiots are that are in Congress, they have the opportunity to be there representing their constituents. You can't say that anywhere else in the world.

Fair enough. And there a lot of them who are there for other reasons that similarly have little or nothing to do with merit. Rubio and others like him are there because of their ethnic and racial background insofar as that is relevant to their constituency. Rubio would likely not be a senator if he hailed from Spokane. But he doesn't; he's from a place with a lot of Cubans.

Then again, as I write that, I'm reminded that my former law school classmate and friend, Raul Labrador, was a Congressman representing his district in Idaho. I don't think the fact that he's Puerto Rican had shit to do with his election ... Raul is a very conservative Mormon married to a white Mormon woman and meets the criteria for election in Idaho.

In a perverse way, AOC won election to the House on the Trump ticket - the outsider's outsider. She was just supported by a different base with a different agenda.

I suppose all that is to say that the country is working in the way it was intended.

As to BO's lack of experience, he's hardly the first, so it shouldn't be held against him any more than it has against others.

Can you name one other community organizer who never had a real job, no business experience, and never held public office and jumped right to President? Me either. He gave good speeches, the white rats liked that, and he was a good looking black man and the rats liked that. Pretty shallow qualifications but if you doubt any of it, just look at the ex-bartender socialist who is a mouthpiece for the rat party right now. That idiot would destroy the country given the chance.

Lest there be any doubt, remember the following by your current Presidential front runner who said what all rat plantation owners were thinking but to smart to say in public other than that dip shit Biden:

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

What about this guy? From the Senate frying pan right into the fire.



And what business chops did, say, Reagan have?

Look, if you want to suggest that they should all be like HW Bush ... a verifiably accomplished individual long before he got to the WH, then I'm on board. But you seem to be cherry picking here a little.

PurpleThrobber

MikeDamone said:

PurpleThrobber said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Didn't notice that Podhoretz made up the quote. Yang does appear to think that racism is a major problem for blacks and hispanics. How giving them free sh*t is going to motivate someone to get a job is a bit beyond me. My experience is that free sh*t is bad for the character and just leads to dependency which is what we have. I'll be prepared to concede that the Great Society and dem promoted welfare have been disastrous to a large chunk of the black community. I'll be prepared to concede that inner city education programs run by dems are actually detrimental to the education of blacks. If we want to call that racist - I won't object.

Yang seems to think that a UBI program would just redirect current welfare money. It won't. It would just end up being a free sh*t add on. Just like Milton Friedman thought that an earned income credit would reward getting a job. In some cases it does, but it is administered by the deep state as a welfare giveaway and billions are gamed out of the program and not one dem gives a crap.

I'm not in a position to support Yang's UBI - but what I do like about the guy is he goes against the Central Party playbook. He's not stuck in the woe-is-me-systemic-history bullshit. Acknowledge it an move the fuck on. I'm more of learn from history, now let's look ahead and make shit better kind of guy. Lamenting crap from 350 years ago isn't going to do shit to compete on a global scale and make USA! USA! USA! the world's greatest country into the next century.

He also doesn't have TDS.

If UBI replaced all other public assistance including social security it might be worth considering. If not, then fuck that.

Like I say, I'm not joined at the hip with the whole UBI concept. But I like Yang because he's not a cum guzzling suck up to the Central Party and doesn't burn a bunch of brains cells on TDS.

IMO, he's the only one who could have a shot at beating Trump. Most of that is based on likeability which goes a long way. Warren and Klobucher will gets slammed because they are cunty bitches.

GrundleStiltzkin

PurpleThrobber said:

MikeDamone said:

PurpleThrobber said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Didn't notice that Podhoretz made up the quote. Yang does appear to think that racism is a major problem for blacks and hispanics. How giving them free sh*t is going to motivate someone to get a job is a bit beyond me. My experience is that free sh*t is bad for the character and just leads to dependency which is what we have. I'll be prepared to concede that the Great Society and dem promoted welfare have been disastrous to a large chunk of the black community. I'll be prepared to concede that inner city education programs run by dems are actually detrimental to the education of blacks. If we want to call that racist - I won't object.

Yang seems to think that a UBI program would just redirect current welfare money. It won't. It would just end up being a free sh*t add on. Just like Milton Friedman thought that an earned income credit would reward getting a job. In some cases it does, but it is administered by the deep state as a welfare giveaway and billions are gamed out of the program and not one dem gives a crap.

I'm not in a position to support Yang's UBI - but what I do like about the guy is he goes against the Central Party playbook. He's not stuck in the woe-is-me-systemic-history bullshit. Acknowledge it an move the fuck on. I'm more of learn from history, now let's look ahead and make shit better kind of guy. Lamenting crap from 350 years ago isn't going to do shit to compete on a global scale and make USA! USA! USA! the world's greatest country into the next century.

He also doesn't have TDS.

If UBI replaced all other public assistance including social security it might be worth considering. If not, then fuck that.

Like I say, I'm not joined at the hip with the whole UBI concept. But I like Yang because he's not a cum guzzling suck up to the Central Party and doesn't burn a bunch of brains cells on TDS.

IMO, he's the only one who could have a shot at beating Trump. Most of that is based on likeability which goes a long way. Warren and Klobucher will gets slammed because they are cunty bitches.

Yang has governability, not electability.

Bendintheriver

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Southerndawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

Bendintheriver said:

Can someone, anyone, describe a positive that is spewed by the rat candidates for President? One positive comment about our country, the people in it or the opportunity for all. Half of them are multi millionaires and the other half aren't and are still on that stage running for President yet none of them have any hint of a positive message.

In my lifetime, after researching and ghosting speeches for some politicians, working in DC, working on some campaigns, I have never, ever, seen politicians who actually believe that this country is so evil that they can't be seen saying anything positive about it. There is no pride on that stage, only victim-hood and financial envy. I get it, they are dividing the races, convincing people they are victims, and creating economic envy so that they can polarize and get that sides votes. But the damage the are doing is a lasting one and it seems that they sincerely want to fundamentally change the entire history of this country and what has made it great.

There is nothing more difficult to watch than a minority bar tender, who isn't that bright, lecturing all of us about how there is no opportunity when she is a member of congress. Or watching a rebuttal after the State of the Union by a Governor, who is clearly out of touch, talk about minority children filling in pot holes to help the government of all things. But worst of all, it is those running for President and their clear lack of appreciation for what our country has done and can offer.

Can anyone detail some positives or is this just me?

I agree with much of what you're saying. But out of curiosity, why did you feel the need to say "minority bartender" instead of just saying "bartender"? It seems to imply her rhetoric would be more palatable had she been a white bartender.

Agree with Derek.

She would not have risen to the position she #Occupies within the party if she was a white bartender.

You are absolutely correct. Neither would BO had he not been black. I know hard core Reps who voted only for him because he was black. They wanted to say they voted for the first black President. His racism was ignored, his total lack of experience. Like many predicted of a Chicago rat being President he was also the most corrupt ever.

I can name 20 other minorities and some whitey's that are in congress that are only there because of their skin color. It is actually a good thing for the country. As much as a pain in the ass some idiots are that are in Congress, they have the opportunity to be there representing their constituents. You can't say that anywhere else in the world.

Fair enough. And there a lot of them who are there for other reasons that similarly have little or nothing to do with merit. Rubio and others like him are there because of their ethnic and racial background insofar as that is relevant to their constituency. Rubio would likely not be a senator if he hailed from Spokane. But he doesn't; he's from a place with a lot of Cubans.

Then again, as I write that, I'm reminded that my former law school classmate and friend, Raul Labrador, was a Congressman representing his district in Idaho. I don't think the fact that he's Puerto Rican had shit to do with his election ... Raul is a very conservative Mormon married to a white Mormon woman and meets the criteria for election in Idaho.

In a perverse way, AOC won election to the House on the Trump ticket - the outsider's outsider. She was just supported by a different base with a different agenda.

I suppose all that is to say that the country is working in the way it was intended.

As to BO's lack of experience, he's hardly the first, so it shouldn't be held against him any more than it has against others.

Can you name one other community organizer who never had a real job, no business experience, and never held public office and jumped right to President? Me either. He gave good speeches, the white rats liked that, and he was a good looking black man and the rats liked that. Pretty shallow qualifications but if you doubt any of it, just look at the ex-bartender socialist who is a mouthpiece for the rat party right now. That idiot would destroy the country given the chance.

Lest there be any doubt, remember the following by your current Presidential front runner who said what all rat plantation owners were thinking but to smart to say in public other than that dip shit Biden:

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

What about this guy? From the Senate frying pan right into the fire.



And what business chops did, say, Reagan have?

Look, if you want to suggest that they should all be like HW Bush ... a verifiably accomplished individual long before he got to the WH, then I'm on board. But you seem to be cherry picking here a little.

JFK? Another good looking well spoken rat politician? Thanks for making my point.

Just stop.

Sledog

JFK would be an alt right conservative to today's rats.

MikeDamone

Sledog said:

JFK would be an alt right conservative to today's rats.

He’d be in the proud boys

RaceBannon

GrundleStiltzkin said:

PurpleThrobber said:

MikeDamone said:

PurpleThrobber said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Didn't notice that Podhoretz made up the quote. Yang does appear to think that racism is a major problem for blacks and hispanics. How giving them free sh*t is going to motivate someone to get a job is a bit beyond me. My experience is that free sh*t is bad for the character and just leads to dependency which is what we have. I'll be prepared to concede that the Great Society and dem promoted welfare have been disastrous to a large chunk of the black community. I'll be prepared to concede that inner city education programs run by dems are actually detrimental to the education of blacks. If we want to call that racist - I won't object.

Yang seems to think that a UBI program would just redirect current welfare money. It won't. It would just end up being a free sh*t add on. Just like Milton Friedman thought that an earned income credit would reward getting a job. In some cases it does, but it is administered by the deep state as a welfare giveaway and billions are gamed out of the program and not one dem gives a crap.

I'm not in a position to support Yang's UBI - but what I do like about the guy is he goes against the Central Party playbook. He's not stuck in the woe-is-me-systemic-history bullshit. Acknowledge it an move the fuck on. I'm more of learn from history, now let's look ahead and make shit better kind of guy. Lamenting crap from 350 years ago isn't going to do shit to compete on a global scale and make USA! USA! USA! the world's greatest country into the next century.

He also doesn't have TDS.

If UBI replaced all other public assistance including social security it might be worth considering. If not, then fuck that.

Like I say, I'm not joined at the hip with the whole UBI concept. But I like Yang because he's not a cum guzzling suck up to the Central Party and doesn't burn a bunch of brains cells on TDS.

IMO, he's the only one who could have a shot at beating Trump. Most of that is based on likeability which goes a long way. Warren and Klobucher will gets slammed because they are cunty bitches.

Yang has governability, not electability.

He make a great cabinet member for Trump

RaceBannon

JFK was a war hero like Bush 1. In 1960 ww2 was 15 years ago

SFGbob

MikeDamone said:

Sledog said:

JFK would be an alt right conservative to today's rats.

He’d be in the proud boys

Surely there has to be a picture of JFK throwing up the “white Power” hand sign somewhere.