Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Senate impeachment trial game thread

1235712

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited January 2020
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

    Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.
    Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.
    Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.
    It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

    This is why you're a partisan shill.
    I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.
    Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

    He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

    Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
    Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!
    Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testify

    Trump has no reason to testify since there is no case against him

    All the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs
    I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant. But I thought you girls were looking for exoneration. I can do the Realpolitik calculus without your help.
    Look at HH and all his righteousness and dire need FEEL justice is being done.

    Keep in mind this is the same ahole who stood silent when BO and the rats spied on reporters they disagreed with, Senators who they wanted information on, used the IRS to take away the rights of innocent American citizens, spent tax payer dollars in an effort to unseat the leader of Israel during an election and wire tapped Trumps election HQ when they knew that the dossier was a fake.

    We can get into all the people who worked for BO pleading the 5th when under oath but I think we all get the idea.

    This scam impeachment is nothing more than an effort to take away the voting rights of everyone who didn't vote for The Bitch. HH is just another goose stepping liberal moron who conveniently ignores the atrocities of Rat leadership when they are in charge.
    Daddy committed his abuses in plain sight. No one could possibly believe you think the facts exonerate him--you're too desperate for the cover-up. You just want this thing processed to its inevitable acquittal without any sort of serious inquiry about what actually happened.

    You and Gasbag are always good for a "What about Obama?!?" Quite a defense.
    The house has the sole power of impeachment. They're the prosecutors in a rigged court and have nothing. They could call all the witnesses they wanted and did not. They failed no one and nothing else failed.

    The Senate has the sole power to adjudicate the impeachment sent over from the house. It is not their job to call new witnesses or investigate that was solely the houses job. They failed at their job and have delivered a steaming pile of shit that does not even contain an impeachable offense. You're side screwed the pooch.

    I left out executive privilege used by presidents since GW. It's a separation of powers. Watching the Senate saying They want Trumps attorney to testify shows how stupid and crazed the left has become.

    Aquit and let's get back to MAGA!
    I got a twofer. This comment just adds to your ignorance.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    As ive said one of the worst things Trump has brought to mainstream politics is everybody calling each other playground names like fucking kids
    Do these fucktards not understand the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution?

    They fucked it up once. Are they going to attempt 'low crimes' instead of 'high crimes' this time to avoid Double Jeopardy?
    You sound scared.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,703 Standard Supporter
    Scratch a leftist find a fascist. Of course we should be scared. I have no interest in getting involved in your little pathetic life. You and yours have a great interest in mine.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Scratch a leftist find a fascist. Of course we should be scared. I have no interest in getting involved in your little pathetic life. You and yours have a great interest in mine.

    We?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,622

    Scratch a leftist find a fascist. Of course we should be scared. I have no interest in getting involved in your little pathetic life. You and yours have a great interest in mine.

    Anyone else anxious not to know any more about Gasbag’s life? Show of hands please.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,321 Founders Club
    Update alert. Team Prez has their defense dialed in like the ‘91 Dawgs. After a pair of offsetting penalty flags from the lead official, the score is 11-0 (11-nil for you soccer fags) in favor of the good guys.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,818 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2020

    Update alert. Team Prez has their defense dialed in like the ‘91 Dawgs. After a pair of offsetting penalty flags from the lead official, the score is 11-0 (11-nil for you soccer fags) in favor of the good guys.

    Have never been a big fan of Jay Sekulow as he was kind of in the whole evangelical, 700 Club world back in the late 80's/early 90's. But he laid the wood on the House of Representatives like Tommie Smith.

  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,925 Founders Club
    Postal91 said:

    HHusky said:


    I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant.

    JFC with the 'daddy' shit, get help. You sound like an unhinged pre-teen.
    You forgot faggot
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,925 Founders Club

    Update alert. Team Prez has their defense dialed in like the ‘91 Dawgs. After a pair of offsetting penalty flags from the lead official, the score is 11-0 (11-nil for you soccer fags) in favor of the good guys.

    Have never been a big fan of Jay Sekulow as he was kind of in the whole evangelical, 700 Club world back in the late 80's/early 90's. But he laid the wood on the House of Representatives like Tommie Smith.

    What was the 700 Club world? Wasn't there some crazy looking lady named Tammy Fay i. That world? Did Jay Sekulow defend her or something?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,622
    Dude61 said:

    Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

    You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,449 Standard Supporter
    Dena are so unhinged its going to be a comedy show.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,622

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

    You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.
    Blah blah blah
    If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,622
    Sledog said:

    Dena are so unhinged its going to be a comedy show.

    What are Dena's personal pronouns?
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,185 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

    You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.
    Blah blah blah
    If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.
    I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.
Sign In or Register to comment.