Senate impeachment trial game thread
Comments
-
What was the 700 Club world? Wasn't there some crazy looking lady named Tammy Fay i. That world? Did Jay Sekulow defend her or something?PurpleThrobber said:
Have never been a big fan of Jay Sekulow as he was kind of in the whole evangelical, 700 Club world back in the late 80's/early 90's. But he laid the wood on the House of Representatives like Tommie Smith.Southerndawg said:Update alert. Team Prez has their defense dialed in like the ‘91 Dawgs. After a pair of offsetting penalty flags from the lead official, the score is 11-0 (11-nil for you soccer fags) in favor of the good guys.
-
-
Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.
-
It's a HIGH crime. A VERY HIGH CRIME, I SAY!!!!!Dude61 said:Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.
-
You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.Dude61 said:Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.
-
Dena are so unhinged its going to be a comedy show.
-
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said: -
What are Dena's personal pronouns?Sledog said:Dena are so unhinged its going to be a comedy show.
-
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said: -
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said: -
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset -
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
-
The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?
-
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset -
You’re free to argue that what the Framers meant by the words they used is irrelevant to the Constitution they adopted. That’s no worse than the rest of your arguments.PurpleThrobber said:
The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next? -
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. Relax! That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset -
-
White flag. Kunt doesn't even address the fact that the House didn't challenge Trump's privilege claims in Court.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed? You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt? -
@MikeDamone true?PurpleThrobber said:
The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next? -
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
-
I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up -
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up -
Remember Race, Huds is the idiot that still thinks the Gentle Giant had his hands up and was murdered by a police officer for no reason.😂😂RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
-
Sure it was. You just remain incapable of spelling it out.HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
Are you stupid? -
I never said for no reason. I’m sure Mike Brown made Officer Wilson really mad.DJDuck said:
Remember Race, Huds is the idiot that still thinks the Gentle Giant had his hands up and was murdered by a police officer for no reason.😂😂RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up -
Better than your citation to US Criminal Code.HHusky said:
You’re free to argue that what the Framers meant by the words they used is irrelevant to the Constitution they adopted. That’s no worse than the rest of your arguments.PurpleThrobber said:
The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?
#waiting.
HIGH CRIMES!!!!!!! -
H has been doing this since Mueller
Trump was really guilty then too. H just couldn't tell us why -
Your quarrel is with the Republicans’ expert.PurpleThrobber said:
Better than your citation to US Criminal Code.HHusky said:
You’re free to argue that what the Framers meant by the words they used is irrelevant to the Constitution they adopted. That’s no worse than the rest of your arguments.PurpleThrobber said:
The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?
#waiting.
HIGH CRIMES!!!!!!! -
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.