So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
Do you want the inquires out in the open it want them hidden? Make up your mind.
Does anyone speak fucking moron?
So what are your thoughts on Bill Taylor's opening statement?
How ironic that the Kunt who accuses others of hiding when they don't respond within 5 minutes completely vanished from this thread after I showed him the opening statement from Bill Taylor. Things must be real bad for Trump if even Gay Bob is struggling to perform the mental gymnastics to come up with a defense for him.
Bill Taylor was burnt to the ground. Another I heard something witness. I heard you live in mom's basement in El Monte and are unemployed.
Do you want the inquires out in the open it want them hidden? Make up your mind.
Does anyone speak fucking moron?
So what are your thoughts on Bill Taylor's opening statement?
How ironic that the Kunt who accuses others of hiding when they don't respond within 5 minutes completely vanished from this thread after I showed him the opening statement from Bill Taylor. Things must be real bad for Trump if even Gay Bob is struggling to perform the mental gymnastics to come up with a defense for him.
Bill Taylor was burnt to the ground. Another I heard something witness. I heard you live in mom's basement in El Monte and are unemployed.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said a fellow Republican lawmaker deconstructed a key part of the latest Trump impeachment inquiry witness testimony in Tuesday's closed-door session.
"In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy [acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill] Taylor's whole argument," McCarthy said.
The questioning by Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and member of both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, was an important moment in the hearing, McCarthy claimed.
"We can't really talk about it," he said.
Ratcliffe appeared on Fox News after the testimony and said there were new details brought to light, but said nothing "worthy of impeachment."
McCarthy added House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not allowing lawmakers to speak too specifically about the proceedings, in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."
"Adam Schiff won't let us talk about what happened," he said regarding U.S. diplomat
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
It is secret but his testimony was destroyed. Live by the leak die by the leak
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said a fellow Republican lawmaker deconstructed a key part of the latest Trump impeachment inquiry witness testimony in Tuesday's closed-door session.
"In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy [acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill] Taylor's whole argument," McCarthy said.
The questioning by Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and member of both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, was an important moment in the hearing, McCarthy claimed.
"We can't really talk about it," he said.
Ratcliffe appeared on Fox News after the testimony and said there were new details brought to light, but said nothing "worthy of impeachment."
McCarthy added House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not allowing lawmakers to speak too specifically about the proceedings, in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."
"Adam Schiff won't let us talk about what happened," he said regarding U.S. diplomat
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
Sweet fucking Geezus, I just told you. He could believe every fucking word he said is true.
What's even cuter is how you're such a fucking coward you can't even admit when you put your head up your fucking ass on an anonymous message board.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
Sweet fucking Geezus, I just told you. He could believe every fucking word he said is true.
What's even cuter is how you're such a fucking coward you can't even admit when you put your head up your fucking ass on an anonymous message board.
Says the coward who ran and hid like a scared bitch after reading the statement
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
Sweet fucking Geezus, I just told you. He could believe every fucking word he said is true.
What's even cuter is how you're such a fucking coward you can't even admit when you put your head up your fucking ass on an anonymous message board.
Says the coward who ran and hid like a scared bitch after reading the statement
Ran and hid? I'm here right now Kunt, and unlike you I've actually responded to the questions you had.
Do you want the inquires out in the open it want them hidden? Make up your mind.
Does anyone speak fucking moron?
So what are your thoughts on Bill Taylor's opening statement?
How ironic that the Kunt who accuses others of hiding when they don't respond within 5 minutes completely vanished from this thread after I showed him the opening statement from Bill Taylor. Things must be real bad for Trump if even Gay Bob is struggling to perform the mental gymnastics to come up with a defense for him.
Wow, an un-rebutted opening statement regarding things Taylor claims to have heard from others. Very impressive. I recall Mueller's opening statement was pretty impressive as well, and then he was questioned about it and it all fell apart.
There's no need to "struggle" in coming up with a defense. Every case I know of contains an opening statement and usually it is impressive. But unlike this star chamber, in normal proceedings the defense get's to present their case and often the impressiveness of the opening statement gets greatly diminished. But for some odd reason, the defense in this case is barred from doing so.
Now, have you figured out if 1973 comes before 2009 dumbfuck?
This is a blatant lie. Republicans have been given an equal chance to ask questions.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
The "point" he is getting at is the fucking lie that I ever believed Obama could be arrested while he was a sitting President.
I believe I thought that when you thought that sucking 10 year old's dicks was legal Hondo.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
Of course not. Bots aren't sophisticated enough to understand nuances of sarcasm and humor. Maybe GayBob v2.0 aka Bend will be more complex.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
Of course not. Bots aren't sophisticated enough to understand nuances of sarcasm and humor. Maybe GayBob v2.0 aka Bend will be more complex.
I understand when someone lies and puts their head up their ass:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
Of course not. Bots aren't sophisticated enough to understand nuances of sarcasm and humor. Maybe GayBob v2.0 aka Bend will be more complex.
I understand when someone lies and puts their head up their ass:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
If Bob repeats a lie often enough. Does it then become fact?
So your defense is that Taylor is a partisan hack and is lying to help overthrow Trump, the man who appointed him? Bold strategy, let's see what happens.
No, my defense is that not being a fucking dipshit I don't swallow whole the un-rebutted opening statement in any trial or hearing. Appears you do.
What is Bill Taylor's motive to lie?
I don't know that he is lying. He maybe be honestly stating what he believes to be true. Doesn't make it correct. Just like when you put your head up your ass and said:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
So what part of his statement do you suspect is not true?
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
The best part is. All Bob sees is 1973 is before 2009 and thinks he's right. He still doesn't have a clue at the point you are getting at.
Of course not. Bots aren't sophisticated enough to understand nuances of sarcasm and humor. Maybe GayBob v2.0 aka Bend will be more complex.
I understand when someone lies and puts their head up their ass:
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
If Bob repeats a lie often enough. Does it then become fact?
You tell me Hondo:
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Comments
"In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy [acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill] Taylor's whole argument," McCarthy said.
The questioning by Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and member of both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, was an important moment in the hearing, McCarthy claimed.
"We can't really talk about it," he said.
Ratcliffe appeared on Fox News after the testimony and said there were new details brought to light, but said nothing "worthy of impeachment."
McCarthy added House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not allowing lawmakers to speak too specifically about the proceedings, in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."
"Adam Schiff won't let us talk about what happened," he said regarding U.S. diplomat
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
I don't think you were lying when you said that IC. I just think you're a fucking moron with a big mouth who often says things that are incorrect not because you're lying but because you're fucking stupid.
That's cute that you continue to copy and paste my words. You really got me this time!
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said a fellow Republican lawmaker deconstructed a key part of the latest Trump impeachment inquiry witness testimony in Tuesday's closed-door session.
"In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy [acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill] Taylor's whole argument," McCarthy said.
The questioning by Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican and member of both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, was an important moment in the hearing, McCarthy claimed.
"We can't really talk about it," he said.
Ratcliffe appeared on Fox News after the testimony and said there were new details brought to light, but said nothing "worthy of impeachment."
McCarthy added House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not allowing lawmakers to speak too specifically about the proceedings, in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."
"Adam Schiff won't let us talk about what happened," he said regarding U.S. diplomat
What's even cuter is how you're such a fucking coward you can't even admit when you put your head up your fucking ass on an anonymous message board.
I believe I thought that when you thought that sucking 10 year old's dicks was legal Hondo.
I'm sure these sound legal arguments coincidentally did not exist between 2009 and 2017 but miraculously appeared now that your boy is in office. Bitchass partisan Kunt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.