Like all scotti links that inevitably center around his TDS, they all include a bunch of "this individual" or "sources say". Never a name. We had to endure that bullshit for 2.5 years. It all came crashing down on him but by God he is just sure that they got Trump this time even though the transcripts prove nothing of the sort happened and the ambassador who knows everyone and everything on the Ukraine side said nothing happened.
Oh and we can't forget that the President of Ukraine has said over and over that nothing happened.
Mulvaney on his explanation saying it sounds like a quid-pro-quo to which Mulvaney said: “We do that all the time with foreign policy.”
Mulvaney is right though. I recall a vice president telling the Ukraine to fire a prosecutor or they don't get the money
Quite common really.
Mulvaney confirms the quid pro quo but the defense has now shifted to quid pro quos are common. At one point even Blob admitted if there was a quid pro quo then Trump should be impeached. I have no doubt now that the quid pro quo has been admitted to his defense will likewise shift.
After trump gets impeached in the coming weeks, he’ll get his trial. That is the constitutionally appropriate forum to adjudicate this. Trumptards are just going to have to wait.
Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?
Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?
Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?
The quid pro quo was for information on Ukraine's role in the 2016 election, not to acquire dirt on Biden.
Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?
Read the transcript
No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
Comments
Oh and we can't forget that the President of Ukraine has said over and over that nothing happened.
I googled it it show that you gave your usual mis characterization
Read the transcript
No quid pro quo
Mulvaney is right though. I recall a vice president telling the Ukraine to fire a prosecutor or they don't get the money
Quite common really.
Mulvaney confirms the quid pro quo but the defense has now shifted to quid pro quos are common. At one point even Blob admitted if there was a quid pro quo then Trump should be impeached. I have no doubt now that the quid pro quo has been admitted to his defense will likewise shift.
Leaks some bullshit and get the minions out to peddle it
It is working to some extent now but as always, at the end they will end up looking stupid
Daddy did not confess!!!!
No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still