We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
You asked what divides us more. Don't move the goalposts to score points. Of course nobody should get attacked for their sexual preference.
But where do you think the attackers got their ideas? Social Media? Or mainstream media that has an unhealthy obsession with LGBTQ characters and lifestyles? Don't think that plays any role?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.
Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.
No, but the Left has a 5 to 1 network advantage, so let's be real.
People clearly only get their new m news from cable TV
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
You seem to care more about protecting the attackers. That’s pretty sick.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media omitting the details and facts of a crime when it harms their narrative and the media highlighting and emphasizing details when it supports their narrative.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
The teens are in jail. Why would we need to identify them? Besides to shoot them to celebrity status? Hope the teens rot away in jail no matter what color class or creed they hail from.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
The teens are in jail. Why would we need to identify them? Besides to shoot them to celebrity status? Hope the teens rot away in jail no matter what color class or creed they hail from.
JFC. You wouldn’t. That’s the fucking point, for the 100th time. God you’re dense.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
The teens are in jail. Why would we need to identify them? Besides to shoot them to celebrity status? Hope the teens rot away in jail no matter what color class or creed they hail from.
JFC. You wouldn’t. That’s the fucking point, for the 100th time. God you’re dense.
If you wouldn't need to identify the teens there is no problem here.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
The teens are in jail. Why would we need to identify them? Besides to shoot them to celebrity status? Hope the teens rot away in jail no matter what color class or creed they hail from.
JFC. You wouldn’t. That’s the fucking point, for the 100th time. God you’re dense.
If you wouldn't need to identify the teens there is no problem here.
Pointing out media hypocrisy and double standards seems to really anger you. Why is that?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
The teens are in jail. Why would we need to identify them? Besides to shoot them to celebrity status? Hope the teens rot away in jail no matter what color class or creed they hail from.
JFC. You wouldn’t. That’s the fucking point, for the 100th time. God you’re dense.
If you wouldn't need to identify the teens there is no problem here.
Mike needs to know what race of teens to avoid whilst riding double-decker night buses in London whilst kissing his boyfriend.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
wE know they're black because the article didn't call out their race. Duh.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried abut it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
I mean I fucking hope so! But it sure was absent from your original post.
How can we stop it if we don’t know who’s doing it? Just some random teens.
Clearly we need to be afraid of the black teens, not the white teens.
Why on earth would you think they are black? Could you be any more racist?
If I were a betting man I’d wager on what the U.K. press likes to refer to as “West Indian” or west Asian
Comments
Nailed it
But where do you think the attackers got their ideas? Social Media? Or mainstream media that has an unhealthy obsession with LGBTQ characters and lifestyles? Don't think that plays any role?
B
E
N
G
H
A
Z
I
!
You seem to like it, though. Unhealthy obsession?
You seem to care more about protecting the attackers. That’s pretty sick.
That’s what divides us
This shit is important to Mike.