They could have been black, or white, or both or neither. But who gives a shit. It was a horrible attack and normal people will feel bad for the two women, and for all lesbian and gay couples who are harassed by low lifes.
However, the Bob Bros are waiting with baited breath, hoping it was a group of black teens so it would validate their worldview.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
How am I concerned about there race? I’m concerned with consistency in reporting facts. I’m not surprised that escapes you.
The topic of your post was to highlight the fact that race is downplayed in these sorts of articles when the perpetrators are non-whites.
Perhaps the journalists are not reporting their race on purpose in order to avoid flaring racial tensions? You're playing dumb if you can't think of anything bad happening from journalists emphasizing race when black people commit crimes.
When they emphasize the race of white people, men like you on college football message board get their feelings hurt. When they emphasize the race of black people, people fucking die. The KKK was founded off of fears of black criminality.
Why is this a bigger issue to you than the fact that gangs of teens in london are harassing Lesbian Couples? Shouldn't that be the focus in this discussion? Not your feelings on a message board?
Race is like, the thing about this situation that absolutely no one but you and your little circle jerk here care about.
Sounds like you view white people as savages unable to contain their violence if they read an article
I assume the OP is a white male that was triggered by a news report of a crime that did not include the Race of the perps.
So maybe the OP can control their anger enough to be peaceful, but it's also as likely they will kick their dog out of the frustration of being oppressed by the media.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.
Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
The Boob Bros. think that White males are being oppressed by the media. Poor guys. It's almost like they are fragile...like a snowflake, maybe?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
The Boob Bros. think that White males are being oppressed by the media. Poor guys. It's almost like they are fragile...like a snowflake, maybe?
The strawman’s ass gets fucked
How does it feel?
And why do you bring up gay sex all the time?
Gay sex, not what I'm personally into, but I wouldn't knock anyone for trying it. Go ahead bob, take the plunge. We don't judge.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Great except YOUR assumptions are based on ignorance.
The age of consent in Britain is 16. MY assumption is your theory would apply to those under 16.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.
Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.
No, but the Left has a 5 to 1 network advantage, so let's be real.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Race of the perps in this story? State secret
Lets say a video was released and it turns out these kids were all white.
What then? Your brain explodes?
Could happen, highly unlikely. Do you ever actually read the news?
Do you feel it’s just some odd coincidence that everyone who isn’t a committed leftist has come to a similar conclusion as to the race of the perps?
It’s not an accident
Everyone?
I think that most people would read the article and not wonder what the perps' Race is. I know that I could not care less.
Some TugTards get triggered by media reporting. Sad!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
The Boob Bros. think that White males are being oppressed by the media. Poor guys. It's almost like they are fragile...like a snowflake, maybe?
The strawman’s ass gets fucked
How does it feel?
And why do you bring up gay sex all the time?
Gay sex, not what I'm personally into, but I wouldn't knock anyone for trying it. Go ahead bob, take the plunge. We don't judge.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Vids of your Covington MAGA bros were posted on social media, no vids of the london bus attackers except for CCTV.
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
The Boob Bros. think that White males are being oppressed by the media. Poor guys. It's almost like they are fragile...like a snowflake, maybe?
The strawman’s ass gets fucked
How does it feel?
And why do you bring up gay sex all the time?
Gay sex, not what I'm personally into, but I wouldn't knock anyone for trying it. Go ahead bob, take the plunge. We don't judge.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
How am I concerned about there race? I’m concerned with consistency in reporting facts. I’m not surprised that escapes you.
The topic of your post was to highlight the fact that race is downplayed in these sorts of articles when the perpetrators are non-whites.
Perhaps the journalists are not reporting their race on purpose in order to avoid flaring racial tensions? You're playing dumb if you can't think of anything bad happening from journalists emphasizing race when black people commit crimes.
When they emphasize the race of white people, men like you on college football message board get their feelings hurt. When they emphasize the race of black people, people fucking die. The KKK was founded off of fears of black criminality.
Why is this a bigger issue to you than the fact that gangs of teens in london are harassing Lesbian Couples? Shouldn't that be the focus in this discussion? Not your feelings on a message board?
Race is like, the thing about this situation that absolutely no one but you and your little circle jerk here care about.
JFC. Yeah, that’s it, they don’t want to fuel racial tensions. You’re either the dumbest mother fucker to ever post here or a liar. maybe both? You should ask Derek to remove you again. fucking dumb shit.
I've hit a nerve. Starting to get it now?
I get you’re triggered by wondering about the media coverage and you coming up with idiotic theories. Yes, I get that. Why so angry?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
I would suggest that the people who intentionally omitted their race are the ones who are truly concerned with their race
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.
The water's murky in here, but you seem to enjoy it.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
It's not about race, per se. It's about the double-standards of the media as they push their narratives while picking winners and losers. And that is what divides people more than any other force in our culture.
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
What divides us more? The media or actual homophobic violence on public transit?
The media. Hands down.
Is that a serious question?
So violence against innocent people living their lives in public is not something you're worried about... ;/
I’m worried about it. That’s the fucking point idiot.
Comments
So maybe the OP can control their anger enough to be peaceful, but it's also as likely they will kick their dog out of the frustration of being oppressed by the media.
And why do you bring up gay sex all the time?
Wake. The. Fuck. Up.
Now what about the rights of arrested v charged?
Not that there's anything wrong with it.
Is that a serious question?