We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
Where did I complain? It’s a simple observation. Why does making that observation trigger you? You seem pretty upset.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Race of the perps in this story? State secret
Lets say a video was released and it turns out these kids were all white.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
Where did I complain? It’s a simple observation. Why does making that observation trigger you? You seem pretty upset.
Are you pleased or displeased by your observation.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Race of the perps in this story? State secret
Lets say a video was released and it turns out these kids were all white.
What then? Your brain explodes?
Could happen, highly unlikely. Do you ever actually read the news?
Do you feel it’s just some odd coincidence that everyone who isn’t a committed leftist has come to a similar conclusion as to the race of the perps?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
Where did I complain? It’s a simple observation. Why does making that observation trigger you? You seem pretty upset.
Are you pleased or displeased by your observation.
Saddened. Which I suppose is displeased. Terrible the truth and consistency aren’t the journalistic standard. Would you not agree that that’s sad?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Vids of your Covington MAGA bros were posted on social media, no vids of the london bus attackers except for CCTV.
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Vids of your Covington MAGA bros were posted on social media, no vids of the london bus attackers except for CCTV.
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Vids of your Covington MAGA bros were posted on social media, no vids of the london bus attackers except for CCTV.
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
Where did I complain? It’s a simple observation. Why does making that observation trigger you? You seem pretty upset.
Are you pleased or displeased by your observation.
Saddened. Which I suppose is displeased. Terrible the truth and consistency aren’t the journalistic standard. Would you not agree that that’s sad?
Are you saddened by the attack at all? Or just the way it was reported?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
How am I concerned about their race? I’m concerned with consistency in reporting facts. I’m not surprised that escapes you.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
Unless they were white
Come on. Grab a clue
It’s as if these Kunts don’t even read the news.
This is exhibit A why liberals deny there is a liberal bias in the MSM.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Vids of your Covington MAGA bros were posted on social media, no vids of the london bus attackers except for CCTV.
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
If we get the pictures I wonder if social media will light up about their “Punchable Face”? I’m just askin!!!!
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
Where did I complain? It’s a simple observation. Why does making that observation trigger you? You seem pretty upset.
Are you pleased or displeased by your observation.
Saddened. Which I suppose is displeased. Terrible the truth and consistency aren’t the journalistic standard. Would you not agree that that’s sad?
Are you saddened by the attack at all? Or just the way it was reported?
Both. Abundance. The NAP is my guiding principle. Which separates me from leftists like you.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Because you're the only one concerned with their Race?
How am I concerned about there race? I’m concerned with consistency in reporting facts. I’m not surprised that escapes you.
The topic of your post was to highlight the fact that race is downplayed in these sorts of articles when the perpetrators are non-whites.
Perhaps the journalists are not reporting their race on purpose in order to avoid flaring racial tensions? You're playing dumb if you can't think of anything bad happening from journalists emphasizing race when black people commit crimes.
When they emphasize the race of white people, men like you on college football message board get their feelings hurt. When they emphasize the race of black people, people fucking die. The KKK was founded off of fears of black criminality.
Why is this a bigger issue to you than the fact that gangs of teens in london are harassing Lesbian Couples? Shouldn't that be the focus in this discussion? Not your feelings on a message board?
Race is like, the thing about this situation that absolutely no one but you and your little circle jerk here care about.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Race of the perps in this story? State secret
Lets say a video was released and it turns out these kids were all white.
What then? Your brain explodes?
Could happen, highly unlikely. Do you ever actually read the news?
Do you feel it’s just some odd coincidence that everyone who isn’t a committed leftist has come to a similar conclusion as to the race of the perps?
It’s not an accident
Imagine a world where the media is the true perpetrator of the crime.
Comments
What then? Your brain explodes?
Are you that obtuse? Yes, yes you are apparently.
Do you feel it’s just some odd coincidence that everyone who isn’t a committed leftist has come to a similar conclusion as to the race of the perps?
It’s not an accident
London attackers have been arrested, not charged. Another good reason that the identities aren't fully released?
Maybe we'll get mugshots and the CCTV at some point and you guys can thump your chests when it turns out they're black or maybe even ****fingers crossed**** recently emigrated black muslims!
Come on. Grab a clue
This is exhibit A why liberals deny there is a liberal bias in the MSM.
Perhaps the journalists are not reporting their race on purpose in order to avoid flaring racial tensions? You're playing dumb if you can't think of anything bad happening from journalists emphasizing race when black people commit crimes.
When they emphasize the race of white people, men like you on college football message board get their feelings hurt. When they emphasize the race of black people, people fucking die. The KKK was founded off of fears of black criminality.
Why is this a bigger issue to you than the fact that gangs of teens in london are harassing Lesbian Couples? Shouldn't that be the focus in this discussion? Not your feelings on a message board?
Race is like, the thing about this situation that absolutely no one but you and your little circle jerk here care about.