We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
I still don’t think I read that the Virginia Beach shooter was a white straight Christian male. That’s normally the lead. Come to think of it, I haven’t read a thing about his race or religion....hmmmmm
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
They could have been black, or white, or both or neither. But who gives a shit. It was a horrible attack and normal people will feel bad for the two women, and for all lesbian and gay couples who are harassed by low lifes.
However, the Bob Bros are waiting with baited breath, hoping it was a group of black teens so it would validate their worldview.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
There you go.
Feel better now.
And guess what... Letting us know if they were black, brown, white or yellow doesn't make their ID's any less private.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Yes...except we know they are teens and male....... adding race would be far from identifying them..so what’s the reason?
Why is it so important for you to know their race? If, as you said, it wouldn't help identify them seeing they are all in custody?
It’s not. And you miss the point, as always.
You are the one who started a thread complaining that the article didn't mention their race.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
They could have been black, or white, or both or neither. But who gives a shit. It was a horrible attack and normal people will feel bad for the two women, and for all lesbian and gay couples who are harassed by low lifes.
However, the Bob Bros are waiting with baited breath, hoping it was a group of black teens so it would validate their worldview.
They could have been black, or white, or both or neither. But who gives a shit. It was a horrible attack and normal people will feel bad for the two women, and for all lesbian and gay couples who are harassed by low lifes.
However, the Bob Bros are waiting with baited breath, hoping it was a group of black teens so it would validate their worldview.
In London? Maybe but unlikely. More likely the religion of peace
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
Great assumption.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Comments
We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.
My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.
The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
However, the Bob Bros are waiting with baited breath, hoping it was a group of black teens so it would validate their worldview.
Feel better now.
And guess what... Letting us know if they were black, brown, white or yellow doesn't make their ID's any less private.
Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids
Admirable. Neither does mine.
In London? Maybe but unlikely. More likely the religion of peace
As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.
MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.
Race of the perps in this story? State secret