"Collusion" sets up a false choice
Comments
-
I got it from some disreputable rag called the NYTimes.2001400ex said:
Odd how there's no link for that quote.SFGbob said:“All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to The Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that The Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier,” they said. “The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele.”
The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee retained Fusion GPS to research any possible connections between Mr. Trump, his businesses, his campaign team and Russia, court filings revealed this week. Working for them, the firm retained Christopher Steele, a respected former British intelligence officer.
Hondo is a pathological liar who will repeat a lie long after it has been shown that his claims are false.
What's not odd is that you're still telling the very same lie you've been telling since I arrived here and you've been shown that you claim is a lie no less than a half a dozen times and yet you still repeat your lie. Because that's what pathological liar do.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/27/us/politics/trump-dossier-paul-singer.html -
2001400ex said:
Bob is too dumb to understand that writing the dossier is just that.... Writing it. Where do you think the information came from for the dossier? Do you think Steele ignored everything that was paid for by the free beacon?
Seriously Bob. Do you ever wonder why no other conservative here circle jerks with you on this point or the point that Trump's team met with Russia about Democrat emails?
“All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to The Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that The Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier,”
Pathological liars lie, it's what they do. -
Talking about impeachment is divisive
It shouldn't be allowed -
Trump just asserted executive privilege for the redactions. What that means is that he is plainly obstructing the House from performing their constitutional oversight duty. Only the House can impeach, so with the president blocking materials about himself relevant for impeachment it is impossible to do their duty. What that means is that he needs to be impeached immediately, not later. There is no other recourse if he is blocking evidence from seeing the light of day.
-
Mueller had all the documentsApostleofGrief said:Trump just asserted executive privilege for the redactions. What that means is that he is plainly obstructing the House from performing their constitutional oversight duty. Only the House can impeach, so with the president blocking materials about himself relevant for impeachment it is impossible to do their duty. What that means is that he needs to be impeached immediately, not later. There is no other recourse if he is blocking evidence from seeing the light of day.
Mueller signed off on the redactions
Your being played. Stop embarrassing yourself -
you'reRaceBannon said:
Mueller had all the documentsApostleofGrief said:Trump just asserted executive privilege for the redactions. What that means is that he is plainly obstructing the House from performing their constitutional oversight duty. Only the House can impeach, so with the president blocking materials about himself relevant for impeachment it is impossible to do their duty. What that means is that he needs to be impeached immediately, not later. There is no other recourse if he is blocking evidence from seeing the light of day.
Mueller signed off on the redactions
Your being played. Stop embarrassing yourself -
Mueller didn't "sign off" on the redactions, buddy. He was consulted only. It was Barr's call
-
anyway the redactions being removed are not going to be made public immediately. It's just redactions needed by the House to stay in the House.
-
Some of the redactions are of Grand Jury testimony. By law that information can't be released publicly. Congress is trying to compel the AG to violate the law.
This move by the House is nothing more than red meat for the leftwing dumbfuck vote. -
The White House was in fact transparent and did in fact give Mueller the tons of documents he wanted and the many people he interviewed. Two and a half years later he released his report. He worked with Barr on the redactions that were required by law
Because folks like the Apostle were lied to for 2 plus years they are now angry and confused and the idiot democrats in the House are continuing to play them for fools by acting like there is something there
Pelosi didn't want to run on impeachment in 2018 and was rewarded with the House. She still doesn't but the morons like Nadler insist on stirring up the low information rabble with false promises of GETTING TRUMP
It would be sad if it wasn't so pathetic
