Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Daily AOC
Comments
-
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish. -
Were 100 miles away from your original claim2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And the GND did talk about cow farts
I'd be embarrassed too
Fuck off -
You're so far out in hypotheticals that it's meaningless.2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
-
Sure. Required maintained could have been missed, sabatouge, etc.2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And how would the bank be responsible? We are still waiting for real life examples of anything remotely close to this assertion by AOC. Which is, the oil companies know fossil fuels are causing a global catastrophe and the finance companies also no this, yet provide capital anyway, so are responsible for damages created by climate change. That’s the assertion. Stay on topic. I know that’s damn near impossible for you. -
There "could" be all kinds of things Hondo. You "could" have been blowing the crane operator and thus caused an accident that led to a spill. I want to know specifically what illegal activity Wells Fargo knew about that would have made them liable. You came running to defend her Hondo, why can't you back up your mouth?2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish. -
Hondo is too stupid to be capable of embarrassment.RaceBannon said:
Were 100 miles away from your original claim2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And the GND did talk about cow farts
I'd be embarrassed too
Fuck off -
AOC: "If there was a leak from the pipeline, why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction?"
The claim by AOC at issue.
The statement by Hondo he made in her defense:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The head up the ass gibberish Hondo responded with when asked to back up this claim:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.
-
Put a fork in this thread. Hondo's never going to back up his mouth as predicted.
-
Hondo can’t answer the question. No surprise there.
-
Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
